Questions & Answers about آنچه پدربزرگ به من داد، بینش بود.
How does using ânche change the emphasis here compared to a standard sentence like pedar-bozorg be man binesh dâd?
Using ânche (that which / what) creates a pseudo-cleft sentence, splitting the sentence into two parts to build emphasis. Instead of simply stating a fact, it isolates binesh (insight) at the very end as the climax of the sentence. It works exactly like the 'What did was [y]' structure in English.
Could I say ânche ke instead of just ânche here?
Yes, they are interchangeable. ânche is a contraction of ân (that) and che (what). Adding ke after it is very common, especially in spoken Farsi, though leaving it out as seen here feels slightly more elegant and concise in formal writing.
Are both verbs required to be in the same tense in this structure?
Not necessarily, but they often align. Here, both dâd (gave) and bud (was) are in the simple past because the entire event happened in the past. If you wanted to say 'What grandfather gave me IS insight' (implying a lasting truth), you could absolutely change bud to ast.
How is the word binesh (insight) formed grammatically?
It is formed by taking bin, the present stem of the verb didan (to see), and adding the suffix -esh. This is an important B2-level pattern to remember: -esh frequently attaches to a present stem to create an abstract noun related to the verb's fundamental meaning.