Result States without a Perfect Auxiliary | Vietnamese Grammar

English often packages an earlier event and its surviving result into a perfect or perfect passive: the machine has broken down, the door has been locked, I have lost the key. Vietnamese has no single auxiliary corresponding to English have in these sentences. It can predicate the result state directly, build a lexical result expression, add rồi when attainment matters, or mention the causing event separately.

The grammar is therefore compositional. The lexical predicate identifies a state or endpoint; temporal expressions locate it; rồi, đã, vẫn, chưa, and discourse context add distinct viewpoints. This page concentrates on how the result state itself is encoded. The pragmatic inference that a past event matters now is developed separately on Present Relevance and Current-State Inference.

Predicate the resulting condition directly

Many Vietnamese words can function as stative or change-of-state predicates without a copula. Hỏng describes being broken/out of order, vỡ being broken or shattered, mất being gone/lost, mở being open, and tắt being off. A final rồi can present the condition as attained.

Máy in hỏng rồi, nên sáng nay mọi người phải sang tầng bên cạnh.

The printer has broken down, so everyone has to go to the adjacent floor this morning.

Cốc vỡ rồi; cẩn thận mảnh kính dưới sàn.

The glass has broken; watch out for shards on the floor.

Đèn hành lang vẫn tắt.

The hallway light is still off.

These clauses directly ascribe a condition to the subject. English selects a perfect in the first two because it conceptualizes a prior change leading to a current result. Vietnamese need not grammatically reconstruct that prior event. Rồi marks attainment/change, while the result predicate supplies the resulting condition.

Without rồi, a time phrase or context can support either a stable-state or event reading:

Cửa sổ mở từ sáng đến giờ.

The window has been open since this morning.

Từ sáng đến giờ measures a state continuing to the present. There is no reason to add an equivalent of English has been; mở is the predicate and the duration phrase supplies the temporal contour.

💡

When English uses a perfect, identify its semantic center. If the important fact is the surviving condition, Vietnamese often starts with the affected entity and predicates hỏng, vỡ, mất, mở, đóng, tắt, or another result directly.

Lexical result expressions encode cause plus outcome

Vietnamese can combine an action with a following result predicate. In làm mất chìa khóa, làm contributes causation and mất the outcome “be gone.” In đập vỡ cốc, the striking event leads to the glass's shattered state. In sơn tường màu xanh, the activity creates a color result.

Tôi làm mất chìa khóa rồi, chắc phải gọi thợ khóa.

I've lost the key, so I'll probably have to call a locksmith.

Gió đập vỡ một ô kính ở ban công.

The wind shattered a pane of glass on the balcony.

Họ đã sơn cánh cửa màu đỏ sẫm.

They painted the door dark red.

The exact syntax is construction-specific. Vietnamese does not freely attach every result word to every verb. Làm + result is productive for causation, but natural collocation matters; đánh thức “wake someone,” đun sôi “bring to a boil,” xé rách “tear/rip,” and lau khô “wipe dry” are conventional combinations. There is no entirely mechanical rule that converts an English resultative into Vietnamese.

Nhớ lau khô bàn trước khi đặt giấy lên.

Remember to wipe the table dry before putting paper on it.

In a result compound, the second element is not a perfect marker. It specifies the endpoint or condition produced by the first event.

State description versus eventive passive

English the door has been locked can answer two different questions: What condition is the door in? What action has someone performed? Vietnamese tends to make that choice more explicit.

Vietnamese	Focus	Natural English
Cửa khóa rồi.	current secured status/change is salient	The door is locked now.
Cửa đã được khóa.(formal)	completed beneficial/neutral action on the door	The door has been locked.
Anh bảo vệ khóa cửa rồi.	agent's completed action and update	The guard has locked the door.
Cửa vẫn còn khóa.	locked condition persists at the reference time	The door is still locked.

Được and bị are not perfect auxiliaries. In passive-like constructions they construe the affected event as favorable/acceptable or adverse/unwanted, though in administrative (formal) prose được can be comparatively neutral. If only the condition matters, a direct predicate is often more idiomatic.

Tài khoản bị khóa vì nhập sai mật khẩu quá nhiều lần.

The account is locked because the password was entered incorrectly too many times.

Here bị khóa presents an adverse affected state/event. The causal phrase explains how it arose; no perfect tense is necessary.

Result, completion, and current state are distinct layers

Xong asserts that a bounded task reached its endpoint; a result predicate states what condition emerged; rồi marks attainment or a discourse update. These layers can coincide but are not interchangeable.

Tôi sửa xong máy rồi, nhưng máy vẫn chạy hơi ồn.

I've finished repairing the machine, but it still runs a little noisily.

Finishing the repair does not entail an ideal result. Conversely, Máy chạy được rồi says the machine can run now, even if further repair work remains.

Máy chạy được rồi, nhưng tôi chưa sửa xong phần vỏ.

The machine works now, but I haven't finished repairing the casing.

This contrast shows why an English perfect translation cannot replace semantic analysis. Chạy được rồi establishes restored operability; chưa sửa xong denies full task completion.

Achievements often make a result accessible without naming a separate state. Đến rồi entails being at the destination under normal circumstances; đi rồi often implies absence from the departure point. Context can cancel a result, so these are inferences rather than inflectional meanings.

Anh Minh đến rồi, đang đợi ở quầy lễ tân.

Minh has arrived and is waiting at reception.

Chị Lan đi rồi, nhưng lát nữa chị ấy quay lại.

Lan has left, but she'll be back shortly.

Time location comes from the clause and discourse

A result state may be current, past, or projected. The predicate does not change form.

Lúc chúng tôi tới, cổng đã đóng rồi.

When we arrived, the gate had already closed.

Đến sáu giờ thì mọi cửa hàng đều đóng rồi.

By six o'clock, all the shops will be closed.

In the first, the arrival supplies a past reference point. In the second, a schedule context can make six o'clock future. Đã foregrounds anteriority in the past example; future-oriented đến sáu giờ plus rồi establishes the projected attained state in the other.

Negation targets different layers. Chưa hỏng says a feared change has not occurred yet; không hỏng simply denies the broken condition; chưa sửa xong says the repair endpoint is pending.

Pin vẫn chưa hỏng, nhưng đã chai khá nhiều.

The battery hasn't failed yet, but it has degraded quite a lot.

Here vẫn chưa presents outright failure as a boundary that remains unreached, although degradation has begun. In a corrective context where no such expectation is intended, plain không hỏng “is not broken” is more neutral.

Compact decision aid and minimal contrast

If you need to express...	Useful Vietnamese strategy	Example
a condition that holds	affected entity + result predicate	Máy hỏng.
attainment of that condition	result predicate + rồi	Máy hỏng rồi.
cause plus result	action/causative + result	làm mất, đập vỡ
completion of a task	V + xong	sửa xong
prior affected event	đã passive/result expression	đã được khóa

The broader system supplies different cues, not conjugated perfect forms:

Form	Core contribution
đã ăn	anterior situation
đang ăn	internal, ongoing phase
sẽ ăn	projection
ăn rồi	attained/relevant update
từng đi	prior experience
mới đến	recent boundary crossing
chưa xong	unreached endpoint
sắp mưa	imminence
vẫn chờ	persistence

Result states in a natural exchange

— Cửa kho khóa chưa? — Khóa rồi, nhưng camera vẫn tắt. Tôi đã gọi kỹ thuật; họ bảo sáng mai mới sửa xong.

— Is the storeroom locked? — Yes, it's locked, but the camera is still off. I've called technical support; they say the repair won't be finished until tomorrow morning.

Short khóa rồi reports attained status. Vẫn tắt predicates a persisting result state. Đã gọi locates a prior call, while sáng mai mới sửa xong places task completion at a future, later-than-desired boundary. One English paragraph may contain several perfect-like forms, but Vietnamese assigns each meaning separately.

Common Mistakes

Translating English has with có

❌ Máy in có hỏng rồi.

Incorrect for ‘the printer has broken’ — có is not a perfect auxiliary.

✅ Máy in hỏng rồi.

The printer has broken down.

Hỏng directly predicates the result, and rồi marks its attainment.

Forcing đã into every perfect translation

❌ Cốc đã vỡ rồi, nên bây giờ nó đang vỡ.

Semantically incoherent — the glass is not normally in an ongoing ‘breaking’ state after shattering.

✅ Cốc vỡ rồi, nên cẩn thận mảnh kính.

The glass has broken, so be careful of the shards.

Lexical aspect matters. Vỡ is a boundary change whose resulting condition, not an ongoing process, is relevant.

Confusing task completion with successful result

❌ Tôi sửa xong máy, nghĩa là máy chắc chắn chạy tốt rồi.

Incorrect inference — finishing a repair attempt does not guarantee the desired state.

✅ Tôi sửa xong phần dây điện, nhưng máy vẫn chưa chạy được.

I've finished repairing the wiring, but the machine still won't run.

Xong closes the specified task; chạy được describes the functional result.

Building an unnecessary passive

❌ Cửa đã được ở trong trạng thái mở từ sáng.

Unnatural calque — a heavy passive/state phrase replaces a simple predicate.

✅ Cửa mở từ sáng đến giờ.

The door has been open since this morning.

Vietnamese directly predicates mở and lets the duration phrase express continuation.

Key Takeaways

Vietnamese has no all-purpose perfect auxiliary; it can predicate a surviving result directly.
Lexical result predicates, causative-result combinations, xong, and rồi contribute different semantic layers.
Được and bị construe affected events or states; they do not mean English perfect have.
Context and temporal phrases locate a result state in the past, present, or future.

Now practice Vietnamese

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Vietnamese →