First- and second-conjugation verbs form their ordinary future indicative with a conspicuous b: laudābō “I will praise,” monēbis “you will warn.” This is often called the b-future. It belongs to the present system, so it is built from the present stem—the stem revealed by the present infinitive—not from the perfect principal part.
The future indicative presents a situation as expected or located after the speaker’s present. It does not by itself express a wish, command, or condition. Those meanings may require a different mood or construction. The regular forms on this page are neutral in Classical prose; special poetic or later patterns are labeled where they occur.
Start from the correct stem
Take the present infinitive and remove -re:
| Conjugation | Principal parts | Present stem | Future base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | laudō, laudāre, laudāvī, laudātum | laudā- | laudāb- |
| 2nd | moneō, monēre, monuī, monitum | monē- | monēb- |
Then add the future endings -bō, -bis, -bit, -bimus, -bitis, -bunt. The long characteristic vowel remains visible: -āb- in the first conjugation and -ēb- in the second. The first-person singular is special in having -bō, while the third-person plural has -bunt.
The active paradigms
| Person | 1st: laudāre | 2nd: monēre | Person-number signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st singular | laudābō | monēbō | I will |
| 2nd singular | laudābis | monēbis | you will |
| 3rd singular | laudābit | monēbit | he/she/it will |
| 1st plural | laudābimus | monēbimus | we will |
| 2nd plural | laudābitis | monēbitis | you all will |
| 3rd plural | laudābunt | monēbunt | they will |
The final part of each form carries person and number, so an expressed subject pronoun is normally unnecessary. Laudābimus already means “we will praise.” A pronoun such as nōs adds contrast or emphasis: nōs laudābimus “we will praise [even if others do not].” Both uses are neutral Classical prose.
Crās dominam conveniam et causam explicābō.
Tomorrow I will meet the lady of the house and explain the reason.
Sī errābis, tē sine īrā monēbō.
If you make a mistake, I will warn you without anger.
Post cēnam epistulās scrībēmus, deinde dormiēmus.
After dinner we will write the letters, and then we will sleep.
The first two examples also show that English “will” does not identify the Latin conjugation. Explicābō uses the first-conjugation b-future; monēbō uses the second. Meanwhile conveniam, scrībēmus, and dormiēmus belong to other conjugations and therefore use a different future pattern.
What the future means in context
The future indicative normally makes a prediction, announces an intention, promises an action, or describes what will happen under a future condition. These are contextual effects of one indicative tense, not separate conjugations.
Hodiē labōrāmus; crās quiēscēmus.
Today we are working; tomorrow we will rest.
Tibi pecūniam mox numerābō.
I will pay you the money soon.
Ubi ad portam perveniēs, servus tē exspectābit.
When you reach the gate, an enslaved man will be waiting for you.
English often uses a present tense in a future time clause—“when you arrive”—but Latin may use a future form where futurity matters: perveniēs. Translate the whole relationship, not each tense label mechanically. Conversely, Latin can use the present for a vividly scheduled or immediate event. Context and authorial viewpoint matter; there is no rule that every English will must become this tense.
The indicative is also distinct from a command. Portam claudēs can sound directive in a suitable context—“you will close the gate”—but morphologically it is future indicative. The ordinary explicit command is imperative portam claude. Tone may make their practical force similar while their grammar remains different.
The passive b-future
The same future marker combines with passive endings. The core forms are laudābor, laudāberis, laudābitur, laudābimur, laudābiminī, laudābuntur and monēbor, monēberis, monēbitur, monēbimur, monēbiminī, monēbuntur. The second-person singular also occurs as laudābere, monēbere. These are all neutral Classical forms.
Convīvae ā dominō laudābuntur.
The guests will be praised by the host.
Ante noctem dē perīculō monēbimur.
Before nightfall we will be warned about the danger.
Active dominus convīvās laudābit makes the host the agent; passive convīvae ā dominō laudābuntur makes the guests the grammatical subject. The future time is the same. Voice changes the event’s perspective, not its location in time. See Future Passive Indicative for the complete cross-conjugation system.
Do not confuse future and imperfect
First- and second-conjugation futures resemble the imperfect because both contain b. The following vowel and ending distinguish them:
| Form | Parse | Translation |
|---|---|---|
| laudābam | imperfect, 1st singular | I was praising / used to praise |
| laudābō | future, 1st singular | I will praise |
| monēbant | imperfect, 3rd plural | they were warning |
| monēbunt | future, 3rd plural | they will warn |
Herī tē monēbam; crās iterum tē monēbō.
Yesterday I was warning you; tomorrow I will warn you again.
The time adverbs confirm the interpretation, but the forms themselves already contrast -bam with -bō. Review the full imperfect pattern on Imperfect Indicative across the Conjugations.
Common Mistakes
1. Building the future from the perfect stem. The future is a present-system tense.
❌ Crās amāvibō.
Incorrect — amāv- is the perfect stem, and -ibō is not the regular first-conjugation future.
✅ Crās tē amābō.
Tomorrow I will love you.
2. Giving a first-conjugation verb the third-conjugation future. The infinitive -āre predicts the b-future.
❌ Servus dominum laudet crās.
Incorrect for the intended plain prediction — laudet is present subjunctive, not future indicative.
✅ Servus dominum crās laudābit.
The enslaved man will praise his master tomorrow.
3. Translating every b-form as future. The imperfect also contains b.
❌ Herī labōrābō.
Incorrect for the intended past meaning — -bō is future, despite the word herī ‘yesterday.’
✅ Herī labōrābam; crās labōrābō.
Yesterday I was working; tomorrow I will work.
4. Ignoring voice. Passive endings make the subject the recipient of the action.
❌ Puella laudābitur magistram.
Incorrect — laudābitur is passive, so puella cannot simultaneously be its active agent governing magistram.
✅ Puella ā magistrā laudābitur.
The girl will be praised by the teacher.
Key Takeaways
Use the present stem: first-conjugation -ā- or second-conjugation -ē-. Add -bō, -bis, -bit, -bimus, -bitis, -bunt for the active, or the corresponding passive endings. Read person, number, voice, and mood from the Latin form before selecting an English translation. The b-future is regular and neutral Classical prose; its resemblance to the imperfect is a spelling cue to inspect the whole ending, not a reason to guess.
Now practice Latin
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Latin →Related Topics
- Imperfect Indicative across the ConjugationsA1 — Build and interpret the imperfect indicative across all four conjugations, including third-iō patterns and the active-passive contrast.
- Future Indicative of Third and Fourth ConjugationsA1 — Build the a/e-future of third, third-iō, and fourth conjugations and distinguish it from similar subjunctive and present forms.
- First-Conjugation Present IndicativeA1 — Build and interpret the complete present indicative active and passive of regular Latin verbs in -āre.
- Second-Conjugation Present IndicativeA1 — Form, recognize, and translate the present indicative active and passive of regular Latin verbs in -ēre.
- Future Passive IndicativeA2 — Build the two Latin future-passive patterns and use context to distinguish prediction, instruction, and overlapping forms.