Hortatory Subjunctive | Latin Grammar

The hortatory subjunctive proposes an action that includes the speaker: eāmus “let us go.” It is normally a first-person plural present subjunctive in an independent clause, negated with nē. English needs “let’s,” “let us,” or another paraphrase; Latin marks the proposal in the verb itself.

The mood here does not mean that going is doubtful or hypothetical. It frames the sentence as an exhortation rather than an assertion. That is the central diagnostic: identify person, mood, and clause independence before choosing an English auxiliary.

The basic pattern

Function	Latin pattern	Model	Natural English
positive proposal	first-person plural present subjunctive	eāmus	let’s go
negative proposal	nē first-person plural present subjunctive	nē abeāmus	let’s not leave
emphatic introduction	age, agite, or nunc subjunctive	age, videāmus	come, let’s see

Post cēnam paulīsper ambulēmus.

Let’s take a short walk after dinner.

Nē nunc dē pecūniā disputēmus; hospitēs adsunt.

Let’s not discuss money now; the guests are here.

No conjunction introduces these clauses. Post cēnam and nunc set the circumstances, but ambulēmus and disputēmus themselves mark the speaker’s proposal. The subject nōs is normally omitted because -mus already identifies “we.”

Formation

Use the ordinary present subjunctive, not a special hortatory ending. First-conjugation ā changes to ē: cūrēmus from cūrō. Other regular conjugations use the present-subjunctive vowel ā: moneāmus, mittāmus, capiāmus, audiāmus. Irregular verbs retain their subjunctive stems: sīmus from sum, eāmus from eō, ferāmus from ferō, velīmus from volō.

Prīmum litterās mittāmus, deinde ad forum eāmus.

First let’s send the letters, then let’s go to the forum.

Patientēs sīmus et rem tōtam audiāmus.

Let’s be patient and hear the whole matter.

Both coordinated verbs belong inside the exhortation. English can use a single “let’s” before two verbs, but Latin marks each finite verb as subjunctive. See Present Subjunctive Formation for the complete paradigms.

💡

The ending -mus tells you who is included; the subjunctive formation tells you that the clause is a proposal. Do not add an expressed nōs unless contrast or emphasis requires it.

What “us” includes

The ordinary hortatory includes the speaker and at least one other person. Context identifies the group. A commander’s progrediāmur may include the entire unit; two friends may use the same form for themselves. Latin does not distinguish inclusive “we” from exclusive “we” morphologically, but an exhortation pragmatically invites those addressed to share the action.

Amīcī, ante tempestātem domum redeāmus.

Friends, let’s return home before the storm.

Hanc quaestiōnem relinquāmus et ad rem redeāmus.

Let’s leave this question and return to the point.

The second example is natural in (formal) debate as well as ordinary discussion. An author can also use the plural to guide readers: nunc videāmus “now let us see.” That inclusive scholarly plural is common in (academic) exposition. It is still a real hortatory framing, although no physical group action is proposed.

Nunc exempla ipsa cōnsīderēmus.

Now let us consider the examples themselves. (formal/academic)

Negation with nē

Independent exhortations use nē, not ordinary statement negator nōn. Compare nōn discēdimus “we are not leaving,” an indicative assertion, with nē discēdāmus “let’s not leave,” a proposal.

Nōn discēdimus: adhūc amīcum exspectāmus.

We are not leaving; we are still waiting for our friend.

Nē discēdāmus priusquam amīcus veniat.

Let’s not leave before our friend arrives.

This minimal contrast shows that subjunctive does not equal English “would.” The indicative describes the group’s plan as a fact; the hortatory attempts to shape the group’s action. Negative nē belongs to that directive force.

An indefinite object after nē commonly uses quis rather than aliquis:

Nē quem sine causā accūsēmus.

Let’s not accuse anyone without cause.

The form quem is accusative masculine singular of quis and belongs to accūsēmus. Its position after nē does not make it the clause introducer.

Present tense and time reference

The present subjunctive normally points to action beginning now or in the future. “Present” names the Latin tense formation, not necessarily simultaneous clock time. Crās proficīscāmur is entirely regular: the adverb places the proposed departure tomorrow.

Crās prīmā lūce proficīscāmur.

Let’s set out tomorrow at first light.

Latin does not ordinarily use a future subjunctive here, because the subjunctive has no simple future tense. Nor should a learner use the imperfect merely because English “let us” feels less immediate. The imperfect subjunctive can occur in past-oriented deliberation or in special rhetorical contexts, but it is not the neutral past of the hortatory. To report an earlier proposal, Latin normally embeds or reports the speech rather than mechanically backshifting an independent eāmus.

Strength and register

The hortatory can be a warm invitation, a practical suggestion, a solemn appeal, or a forceful rallying cry. Mood alone does not fix politeness. Vocatives, particles, lexical choice, and situation provide the tone.

Age, pōculum vīnī bibāmus et veterum amīcōrum meminerīmus.

Come, let’s drink a cup of wine and remember old friends.

Here age is a discourse prompt, literally an imperative “come on”; it does not govern the subjunctives. In (literary) and (formal) prose, writers often guide argument with redeāmus, “let us return.” Cicero writes:

Sed ad instituta redeamus.

But let us return to our subject. (Cicero, Brutus 220; source spelling reproduced without added macrons.)

The line is rhetorically polished, but the construction itself is productive Classical Latin, not an archaism.

💡

Translate according to tone: eāmus may be “let’s go,” “let us proceed,” or “come, we should go.” The grammatical constant is a speaker-inclusive proposal.

Hortatory versus neighboring clause types

Person is the quickest distinction. First-person plural veniāmus is normally called hortatory; third-person veniat “let him/her come” is normally called jussive. A question such as quid faciāmus? “what are we to do?” is deliberative, because it asks what course to choose rather than recommending one.

Taceāmus et audiāmus.

Let’s be quiet and listen. (hortatory proposal)

Quid nunc faciāmus?

What are we to do now? (deliberative question)

Word order does not create the contrast. The question mark and interrogative quid frame the second clause as deliberation; the first independently urges a course of action.

A production routine

Begin with the communicative act, not English “let.” If the speaker proposes shared action, choose first-person plural present subjunctive. Build the correct stem, add -mus, and put nē before a negative proposal. Then add time expressions normally. Thus “Let’s carry these boxes inside tomorrow” becomes crās hās arcās intrō ferāmus, not an infinitive after an invented equivalent of English “let.”

Common Mistakes

1. Using the indicative because English has “we”

❌ Nunc ad portum ambulāmus!

Wrong for the intended proposal — this asserts ‘we are walking now.’

✅ Nunc ad portum ambulēmus!

Now let’s walk to the harbor!

2. Negating with nōn

❌ Nōn dē eādem rē iterum disputēmus.

Nonstandard for a direct negative exhortation — use nē.

✅ Nē dē eādem rē iterum disputēmus.

Let’s not argue about the same matter again.

3. Translating the subjunctive automatically with “would”

❌ Ad rem redīrēmus.

Incorrect for a present proposal — the imperfect subjunctive does not replace the hortatory present merely because English can use would.

✅ Redeāmus ad rem.

Let’s return to the point.

4. Using an infinitive after a literal equivalent of “let”

❌ Sine nōs abīre.

Incorrect as the ordinary way to say ‘let’s leave’; this instead tries to command someone to allow us to leave.

✅ Abeāmus ante noctem.

Let’s leave before nightfall.

Key Takeaways

The hortatory subjunctive is an independent, speaker-inclusive directive: first-person plural present subjunctive, with nē for negation. It normally refers to present or future action even though no future subjunctive exists. Parse the form as a clause type before translating; “let’s” is a useful English rendering, not a word-for-word account of Latin structure.

Now practice Latin

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Latin →