English uses passive syntax both to suppress an agent and to keep an affected entity as subject. Hungarian usually achieves those discourse goals without changing to passive voice. It can topicalize an object in an active clause, leave the subject implicit, use generic third-person plural, or describe a result with -va/-ve + van. A causative answers a different question: who arranged, compelled, or enabled the event?
This page contrasts choices that share an English translation. The productive morphology appears on the forms page, and central contexts appear on the usage page.
Doing an action versus arranging it
Dóra megjavította a kerékpárt.
Dóra repaired the bicycle.
Dóra megjavíttatta a kerékpárt.
Dóra had the bicycle repaired.
The extra causative -tat- changes Dóra from performer to causer. The technician can remain unexpressed. English learners often miss this morphological difference because English have carries the causative function as a separate word.
If the performer matters, mark it according to the base verb's valency:
Dóra megjavíttatta a szerelővel a kerékpárt.
Dóra had the mechanic repair the bicycle.
Because megjavít already has accusative a kerékpárt, instrumental-comitative a szerelővel marks the causee. With an intransitive base, the causee is commonly accusative:
A rendező beléptette a színészeket.
The director had the actors enter.
This opposition is productive, but individual causatives can lexicalize specialized meanings. Mutat “show,” for example, is historically/formally related to causation but is learned as an ordinary lexical verb, not generated afresh as “make see.”
Causative or explicit control verb?
The causative suffix itself does not reliably distinguish force from permission.
A tanár elénekeltette velünk a dalt.
The teacher made us sing the song.
A tanár megengedte, hogy elénekeljük a dalt.
The teacher allowed us to sing the song.
The first can be coercive or simply describe an assigned classroom activity. The second explicitly encodes permission. For unequivocal force, use kényszerít:
A főnök arra kényszerítette őket, hogy hétvégén is dolgozzanak.
The boss forced them to work over the weekend too.
Event report or result state?
A technikus tegnap frissítette a rendszert.
The technician updated the system yesterday.
A rendszer már frissítve van.
The system has already been updated.
The active clause reports an event and names its agent. The -va/-ve clause presents the system's current state. A past time locating the action itself therefore favors an active reformulation:
A rendszert tegnap frissítették.
The system was updated yesterday.
This is active generic third-person plural, despite the natural English passive translation. A rendszer tegnap frissítve volt can be grammatical, but it means that the system was in an updated state yesterday; it does not by itself locate the updating event yesterday.
Unknown agent or generic norm?
Third-person plural can hide a particular unknown actor or express what people generally do.
Ellopták a biciklimet az állomásnál.
My bicycle was stolen near the station.
Magyarországon névnapot is ünnepelnek.
In Hungary, people also celebrate name days.
The first implies actual but unidentified thieves. The second has a generic human subject comparable to English “people.” A singular impersonal strategy is available with certain predicates and contexts—Itt nem szabad dohányozni “Smoking is not allowed here”—but there is no single universal passive replacement.
An active clause can also omit a contextually known subject:
A minisztérium elkészítette a tervezetet, és jövő héten benyújtja a parlamentnek.
The ministry prepared the draft and will submit it to parliament next week. (formal)
The second subject is recoverable from coordination. Calling every omitted subject “impersonal” would be wrong: here the agent is specific and known.
Topical object versus passive subject
Hungarian can begin with an object without turning it into a grammatical subject.
A szerződést Júlia írta alá.
It was Júlia who signed the contract.
A szerződést retains accusative -t, and Júlia is preverbal focus. The clause is active. Compare an agent-backgrounding report:
A végleges szerződést hétfőn aláírták.
The final contract was signed on Monday.
The early object serves as topic in both. In the first, the focused agent is the new contrast; in the second, generic plural suppresses it. English passive subjecthood is not needed because Hungarian case and verb agreement preserve roles independently of order.
Modern impersonal expression versus old passive
Az eredményeket holnap kihirdetik.
The results will be announced tomorrow.
Az eredmények holnap kihirdettetnek.
The results shall be announced tomorrow. (archaic or deliberately ceremonial)
The first is neutral contemporary Hungarian: accusative topic plus generic plural active verb. The second uses the old passive and sounds historical, solemn, humorous, or bureaucratically archaizing. Fixed formulas such as közhírré tétetik remain recognizable, but productive use in ordinary reporting is not standard modern style.
Formal register does not automatically license the old passive. Academic and administrative Hungarian generally favors an institution as agent, a generic plural, a deverbal noun, or a construction such as sor kerül valamire “something takes place,” selected for meaning rather than as a mechanical ban on active voice.
Definiteness survives causativization
The causative is conjugated like another transitive Hungarian verb. Its object still determines definite versus indefinite agreement.
Íratok egy igazolást az orvossal.
I'll have the doctor write a certificate.
Megíratom az igazolást az orvossal.
I'll have the doctor write the certificate.
Indefinite egy igazolást selects íratok; definite az igazolást selects megíratom. The instrumental causee does not determine conjugation. Learners who focus only on the long causative stem often overlook the final agreement ending.
Decision tree
- Does the grammatical subject perform the action? Use an ordinary active verb.
- Does the subject arrange, compel, permit, or commission it? Use a causative; check whether the base verb already has an accusative object before marking the causee.
- Is permission or force itself important? Prefer an explicit control verb such as megenged or kényszerít.
- Do you report an event while leaving a human agent unnamed? Use active third-person plural, often with the affected object as topic.
- Do you describe the current resulting condition? Use -va/-ve + van/vannak.
- Are you quoting, parodying, or deliberately imitating old official style? Only then consider -atik/-etik.
Diagnostic exercise
Choose the best continuation.
- You commissioned a craftsperson to reupholster your chair: Újrakárpitoztattam a széket.
- The relevant event happened yesterday, actor unknown: Tegnap kézbesítették a csomagot.
- You discover the package's present condition: A csomag fel van bontva.
- A modern notice says applications are checked continuously: A kérelmeket folyamatosan ellenőrzik.
Item 1 is a service causative: the subject commissioned rather than personally performed the work. Item 2 is generic-plural event reporting; item 3 is a result state; item 4 is neutral formal impersonal usage, not an old passive.
Common Mistakes
❌ Holnap javítom meg a laptopomat a szervizzel.
Incorrect for commissioning a repair; the ordinary verb says the subject performs the repair.
✅ Holnap megjavíttatom a laptopomat a szervizben.
Tomorrow I'll have my laptop repaired at the service center.
❌ A rendező tegnap elmondatta a színészeket a verset.
Incorrect causee marking: transitive elmond already has the accusative object a verset.
✅ A rendező tegnap elmondatta a színészekkel a verset.
The director had the actors recite the poem yesterday.
❌ A dokumentum 2024-ben alá van írva.
Misleading if 2024 dates the signing event; the result-state form describes a state.
✅ A dokumentumot 2024-ben írták alá.
The document was signed in 2024.
❌ A pályázatok jövő héten vannak elbírálva.
Incorrect for a future assessment event; vannak describes a present result state.
✅ A pályázatokat jövő héten bírálják el.
The applications will be assessed next week.
Key Takeaways
- Causatives add a causer; passive-like strategies suppress or background an agent.
- The base verb's valency determines whether a causee can be accusative or must be distinguished from an existing object.
- Generic third-person plural reports events; -va/-ve + van profiles resulting states.
- An object can be topical without becoming a passive subject.
- Reserve -atik/-etik for genuine archaic or deliberately marked register.
Now practice Hungarian
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Hungarian →Related Topics
- Causatives, Passives, and Impersonal Strategies: Forms and Core PatternB2 — Form Hungarian causatives and choose modern active, generic-plural, and result-state alternatives to English passive clauses.
- Causatives, Passives, and Impersonal Strategies: Meanings and UsageB2 — Choose natural Hungarian strategies for causing an action, suppressing an agent, reporting an event, and describing a resulting state.
- Adverbial Participles in -va/-ve: Contrasts and Learner TrapsB1 — Choose accurately among -va/-ve participles, finite clauses, event nominals, adjectives, and resultant-state constructions.
- Choosing Conjugation by Object Definiteness: Contrasts and Learner TrapsB1 — Choose Hungarian indefinite, definite, or -lak/-lek verb forms from the grammatical class of the direct object, including omitted and clausal objects.
- Immediately Preverbal Focus: Contrasts and Learner TrapsB1 — Distinguish Hungarian preverbal focus from neutral order, topics, bare-noun predicates, negation, and explicit only-statements.