Using the Future: Prediction, Intention, Request | Hebrew Grammar

Hebrew has exactly one future: the prefix conjugation, א / ת / י / נ bolted onto the stem. There is no will and no shall: nothing has to stand in front of the verb, because the prefix has already said it. Hebrew does have עומד ל־ for about to — אני עומד לצאת — but that is a separate construction with its own meaning, not a way of marking the future; it is on in the middle of doing. What the prefix conjugation has to cover on its own is correspondingly wide, and a learner who has only met it as "the future tense" will keep hearing it in places that do not look like the future at all.

Five jobs, one form

Job	Example	English
prediction	מחר ירד גשם	it's going to rain tomorrow
intention, promise	אתקשר אלייך	I'll call you
offer, polite question	תרצה קפה?	would you like a coffee?
required by the syntax	כדי שנספיק	so that we make it
everyday command	תשב	sit down

The form is identical in all five rows. Which reading you get is decided by the person of the verb, by what kind of sentence it sits in, and by the situation — never by the morphology. That is the opposite of English, where I'll call you, would you like and sit down are three different constructions.

Prediction

The narrowest and least interesting job, but the one every course teaches first: saying what will happen.

אומרים שמחר ירד גשם, אז אל תשכח מטרייה.

omrím shemakhár yeréd géshem, az al tishkákh mitriyá

They say it's going to rain tomorrow, so don't forget an umbrella. (to a man)

הם לא יגיעו לפני תשע, יש פקקים בכניסה לעיר.

hem lo yagí'u lifnéi tésha, yesh pkakím baknisá la'ír

They won't be here before nine — the traffic coming into town is bad.

Intention, promise, offer

This is where the future does most of its daily work, and where English speakers most often over-translate. A first-person future is normally an undertaking: not a forecast about yourself, but a commitment.

אני אתקשר אלייך אחרי הישיבה, אני מבטיח.

aní etkashér eláyikh akharéi hayeshivá, aní mavtíakh

I'll call you right after the meeting, I promise. (m. speaker, to a woman)

אל תדאגי, אחזיר לך את הכסף בסוף החודש.

al tid'agí, akhzír lakh et hakésef besóf hakhódesh

Don't worry, I'll pay you back at the end of the month. (to a woman)

Turn the same first-person future into a question and it becomes an offer — Hebrew's equivalent of shall I…? Turn it into a second-person question and it becomes the standard way of offering something to someone else.

אביא לך כוס מים?

aví lakh kos máyim?

Shall I get you a glass of water? (to a woman)

תרצה קפה, או שאתה ממהר?

tirtsé kafé, o she'atá memahér?

Would you like a coffee, or are you in a hurry? (to a man)

מה תשתו? יש בירה קרה במקרר.

ma tishtú? yesh bíra kará bamekarér

What'll you have? There's cold beer in the fridge. (to a group)

💡

The bare future is the promise. English hedges commitments with a modal — I'll try to, I think I'll, I should be able to — and English speakers carry the padding into Hebrew, producing sentences that sound evasive rather than polite. אחזור אלייך היום is a normal, courteous thing to say. Add אולי or אני חושב ש and you have not been polite; you have withdrawn the promise.

The same verb, three readings

Nothing separates these three uses of שלח except who is speaking and to whom. Read them as one short exchange.

היא אמרה שהיא תשלח את הקובץ עד מחר בבוקר.

hi amrá shehí tishlákh et hakóvets ad makhár babóker

She said she'd send the file over by tomorrow morning. — a report of what will happen

אשלח לך את זה ברגע שאגיע הביתה.

eshlákh lekhá et ze baréga she'agía habáyta

I'll send it to you the moment I get home. (to a man) — a promise

תשלחי לי הודעה כשאת יוצאת.

tishlekhí li hoda'á kshe'át yotsét

Text me when you leave. (to a woman) — a request

Third person leans towards report and prediction, first person towards undertaking, second person towards request. Those are tendencies, not rules — תשלחי לי הודעה with a rising intonation is a question about what she intends to do, and only the voice separates it from the instruction.

Where the syntax simply requires it

Some Hebrew slots take the future because that is what goes there, whatever English does. After כדי ש ("so that") the verb is future; after כש־ and אם the future is normal for a one-off event still to come — precisely the position where English forbids its own future and switches to the present.

נצא מוקדם כדי שנספיק להגיע לפני שסוגרים.

netsé mukdám kdei shenaspík lehagía lifnéi shesogrím

Let's leave early so we make it there before they close.

אם ירד גשם, ניקח מונית.

im yeréd géshem, nikákh monít

If it rains, we'll take a taxi.

💡

English trains you to avoid the future in a time clause: when you arrive, never when you will arrive. Hebrew has no such ban — כשתגיע is the ordinary way to say it. The present is also possible there (כשאתה מגיע), which reads as more habitual; but the future is never the mistake, and refusing to use it is a genuine English accent.

"Going to" and הולך ל־

הולך ל־ plus an infinitive is normally read literally: someone is physically going somewhere in order to do something.

הוא הולך לישון, הוא קם בחמש.

hu holékh lishón, hu kam bekhamésh

He's off to bed — he's up at five.

You will nevertheless meet a genuine going to future with a subject that cannot go anywhere. זה הולך להיות returns 71 hits on Hebrew Wikipedia (insource:/זה הולך להיות/, checked 10 August 2026), concentrated in articles on films and songs — that is, in translated and quoted dialogue, which is exactly the profile of a construction that entered through contact with English. It exists; do not treat it as an error. It is simply not what Hebrew reaches for by default.

זה הולך להיות ערב ארוך.

ze holékh lihyót érev arókh

This is going to be a long evening. (colloquial)

The safe habit: when you would say going to in English, use the plain prefix conjugation. אדבר איתו covers I'll talk to him and I'm going to talk to him with nothing added.

The gender the future cannot hide

Two morphological facts carry over into usage. The first-person א is written but is not a sound of its own: אכתוב is ekhtóv, with nothing in front of the e. And in the past, the two singular "you" forms are a single written string — כתבת is both katávta and katávt, and only the voice separates them. In the future they are two different strings, because a female addressee takes ־י:

	to a man	to a woman
past	כתבת — one spelling, two readings
future	תכתוב	תכתבי
future	תשלח	תשלחי

So the future is where addressing a woman with a masculine form becomes visible on the page as well as audible. In the plural, both tenses collapse the genders in ordinary Hebrew: כתבו and יכתבו serve הם and הן alike. The paradigm itself, including the classical ־נָה forms, is on the pa'al future.

And the command

The largest single use of the future is not on this page. Telling someone to do something — תשב, תגיד לי, תחכה רגע — is an ordinary second-person future in everyday Israeli speech, and it is worked out on the future as an everyday command. One caution while you are here: תגיד and תשמע are frequently not commands at all but turn-openers, closer to English say… or look…, and nobody is being told to speak or listen.

תגיד, אתה יודע מתי הם מגיעים?

tagíd, atá yodéa matáy hem magi'ím?

Say, do you know when they're getting here? (to a man)

You will also hear Israelis put the third-person י־ prefix on a first-person future — אני יגיד, אני יביא. It is very common in speech and heavily stigmatised in writing; the register note is on the pa'al future. Recognise it, and write א־.

Common Mistakes

1. A masculine future to a female addressee. English you'll come is genderless, so the distinction has to be added rather than translated.

❌ את תבוא איתנו לים ביום שישי?

Incorrect — את requires the ־י ending. The masculine תבוא can only mean 'you (m.) will come' or 'she will come'.

✅ את תבואי איתנו לים ביום שישי?

at tavó'i itánu layám beyóm shishí?

Are you coming to the beach with us on Friday? (to a woman)

2. A present tense after כדי ש. English so that I can find has no future in it, and the present gets copied across.

❌ יצאתי מוקדם כדי שאני מוצא מקום חנייה

Incorrect — a purpose clause with כדי ש takes the future, never the present: כדי שאני אמצא. And when both halves have the same subject, Hebrew more often drops the clause altogether and uses an infinitive: יצאתי מוקדם כדי למצוא מקום חנייה.

✅ יצאתי מוקדם כדי שאני אמצא מקום חנייה ליד הבניין.

yatsáti mukdám kdei she'aní emtsá makóm khaniyá leyád habinyán

I left early so I'd find a parking space near the building.

3. Hedging a promise into a forecast. Both sentences below are correct Hebrew. Only the first one commits you to anything.

✅ אני אבדוק את זה ואחזור אלייך היום.

aní evdók et ze ve'ekhzór eláyikh hayóm

I'll look into it and get back to you today. (to a woman) — an undertaking

✅ אני חושב שאולי אבדוק את זה מחר.

aní khoshév she'ulái evdók et ze makhár

I think I might have a look at it tomorrow. — the same verb, now genuinely non-committal

4. Reading הולך ל־ as an auxiliary. With a human subject it is a person on their feet, and the listener will picture exactly that.

✅ אני הולך לדבר איתו עכשיו, הוא במשרד ממול.

aní holékh ledabér itó akhsháv, hu bamisrád mimúl

I'm going over to talk to him now — he's in the office across the way. (m. speaker) — literal motion

✅ אדבר איתו מחר בבוקר.

adabér itó makhár babóker

I'm going to talk to him tomorrow morning. — the plain future, which is what Hebrew uses here

Key Takeaways

Hebrew has one future form and no future auxiliary — nothing has to stand in front of the verb, because the prefix has already said will. (עומד ל־ about to is a real construction, not a tense marker.)
The same prefix conjugation does prediction, intention and promise, offers and polite questions, syntactically required futures, and everyday commands. Person and context select the reading; the morphology never does.
A first-person future is normally an undertaking, and a first-person future question is an offer — אביא לך מים? is shall I get you water?
כדי ש takes the future, and after כש־ and אם the future is normal — the very slot where English bans its own future.
הולך ל־ is motion plus purpose by default. A true going to future (זה הולך להיות) exists in Israeli usage and should not be marked wrong, but the unmarked Hebrew future is the prefix conjugation.
The future writes the two singular "you"s differently (תשלח / תשלחי) where the past writes them the same (שלחת), so gender agreement becomes visible in print.

Now practice Hebrew

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Hebrew →