The past hangs the person on the end of the verb; the future bolts it on the front. Four prefix letters do the whole job — א, י, ת, נ — with two suffixes added in three cells, and those affixes are identical in every binyan. What changes from verb to verb is only the vowel sitting between the second and third root letters, and this page is largely about that vowel.
The paradigm
| Subject | Pointed | Written | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| אֲנִי | אֶכְתּוֹב | אכתוב | ekhtóv |
| אַתָּה | תִּכְתּוֹב | תכתוב | tikhtóv |
| אַתְּ | תִּכְתְּבִי | תכתבי | tikhteví |
| הוּא | יִכְתּוֹב | יכתוב | yikhtóv |
| הִיא | תִּכְתּוֹב | תכתוב | tikhtóv — identical to אַתָּה |
| אֲנַחְנוּ | נִכְתּוֹב | נכתוב | nikhtóv |
| אַתֶּם / אַתֶּן | תִּכְתְּבוּ | תכתבו | tikhtevú |
| הֵם / הֵן | יִכְתְּבוּ | יכתבו | yikhtevú |
| classical אַתֶּן / הֵן | תִּכְתּוֹבְנָה | תכתובנה | tikhtóvna — see below |
Read the prefix column on its own and the system is four letters: א for I, נ for we, י for he and they, ת for everything second-person plus she. Then two suffixes: ־י marks a single female addressee, ־וּ marks any plural. Israeli schools teach the prefix letters as the mnemonic word אית״ן eitán, and the letters never change from binyan to binyan even though the vowel under them does — the argument is on suffix conjugation vs prefix conjugation.
אשמור לך את המנה בתנור.
eshmór lekhá et hamaná batanúr
I'll keep your food warm in the oven for you. (to a man)
אנחנו נסגור מוקדם בערב חג.
anákhnu nisgór mukdám be'érev khag
We close early on the eve of a holiday.
תכתבי לי כשתגיעי, אני לא הולך לישון עד אז.
tikhteví li kshetagí'i, aní lo holékh lishón ad az
Text me when you get in — I'm not going to sleep until you do. (m. speaker, to a woman)
Two more cholam verbs, and one that is not
| Subject | ש־מ־ר | ס־ג־ר | ל־מ־ד (patach class) |
|---|---|---|---|
| אֲנִי | אֶשְׁמוֹר eshmór | אֶסְגּוֹר esgór | אֶלְמַד elmád |
| אַתָּה / הִיא | תִּשְׁמוֹר tishmór | תִּסְגּוֹר tisgór | תִּלְמַד tilmád |
| אַתְּ | תִּשְׁמְרִי tishmerí | תִּסְגְּרִי tisgerí | תִּלְמְדִי tilmedí |
| הוּא | יִשְׁמוֹר yishmór | יִסְגּוֹר yisgór | יִלְמַד yilmád |
| אֲנַחְנוּ | נִשְׁמוֹר nishmór | נִסְגּוֹר nisgór | נִלְמַד nilmád |
| אַתֶּם / אַתֶּן | תִּשְׁמְרוּ tishmerú | תִּסְגְּרוּ tisgerú | תִּלְמְדוּ tilmedú |
| הֵם / הֵן | יִשְׁמְרוּ yishmerú | יִסְגְּרוּ yisgerú | יִלְמְדוּ yilmedú |
The cholam is a default, not a rule. A substantial class of perfectly regular pa'al verbs takes a patach instead — לָמַד gives אֶלְמַד and יִלְמַד, with no o anywhere. Among sound roots the split is lexical — a property of the individual verb, not something the consonants or the meaning let you compute. Statives do cluster in the patach class (יִגְדַּל yigdál "will grow"), but that is a tendency, not a test: לָמַד sits there too and is anything but stative. The vowel is learned with the verb, the way you learn a German noun's gender. Which verbs take which, and the partial predictions that do exist, are on the pa'al future vowel.
אם יהיה לי זמן, אלמד ערבית בשנה הבאה.
im yihyé li zman, elmád aravít bashaná haba'á
If I've got the time, I'll take up Arabic next year.
The theme vowel does not survive a suffix
Compare יִכְתּוֹב with יִכְתְּבוּ. The cholam is gone — and so is the patach of יִלְמַד in יִלְמְדוּ. Whenever ־י or ־וּ is attached to a pa'al future, the stress moves onto the ending and the theme vowel reduces to a shva that Israelis do not pronounce at all: yikhteví, yikhtevú, tishmerú, tilmedú.
This is the single most productive error in the whole paradigm, because the endings look like they should just be added on. They are not: the ending arrives and the vowel leaves.
הם ישמרו על הבית שלנו בזמן שאנחנו בחוץ לארץ.
hem yishmerú al habáyit shelánu bizmán she'anákhnu bekhúts la'árets
They'll look after our place while we're abroad.
One yod or two: the spelling rule that is usually stated wrongly
Sound-root pa'al futures are written with a single yod: יכתוב, ישמור, יסגור, ילמד. The doubled ייכתב you have seen belongs to nif'al — but "double yod means nif'al" is the wrong generalisation, and it will fail you on the very first weak root you meet.
The actual rule is about sound, not binyan: a chirik standing before a doubled consonant is written with a yod in ktiv male. nif'al happens to satisfy it constantly, because its future doubles the first root letter — יִיכָּתֵב, יִיכָּנֵס. But so do a large group of pa'al verbs, wherever a נ has assimilated into the next letter and left a dagesh behind:
| Pointed | Ktiv male | Why |
|---|---|---|
| יִכְתּוֹב yikhtóv | יכתוב | pa'al, sound root — nothing is doubled, one yod |
| יִפּוֹל yipól | ייפול | pa'al נ־פ־ל — the נ assimilated, פּ is doubled |
| יִתֵּן yitén | ייתן | pa'al נ־ת־ן — same assimilation |
| יִכָּנֵס yikanés | ייכנס | nif'al — the binyan doubles the first root letter |
אם תיקח מונית, תגיע בעשר דקות.
im tikákh monít, tagía be'éser dakót
If you take a taxi you'll be there in ten minutes. (to a man — תיקח, two yods, because the ק is doubled)
תיזהר, הכוס תיפול.
tizahér, hakós tipól
Careful — that glass is going to go over. (to a man)
תכתוב is two different people
The prefix ת־ serves you (masculine singular) and she, and no suffix separates them. This collision runs through the future of every verb in the language and never resolves morphologically — the pronoun or the context has to do it.
אתה תסגור את המשרד או שהיא תסגור?
atá tisgór et hamisrád o shehí tisgór?
Are you locking up the office or is she? (one form, two subjects)
That is the main reason Hebrew keeps its subject pronouns in the future far more readily than in the past: dropping אתה or היא here costs information the verb cannot recover.
The ־נָה forms
Classical Hebrew has a separate feminine plural in the future: תִּכְתּוֹבְנָה for both אַתֶּן and הֵן. It is still normative — the Academy of the Hebrew Language treats it and the plural ־וּ forms as two acceptable options, the classical one simply being rare in speech — and you will meet it in the Bible, in liturgy, in poetry and in some formal writing. What you will not meet is an Israeli producing it.
In ordinary Hebrew, of any register you are likely to speak: יכתבו covers a group of women and תכתבו covers female addressees. Do not learn the ־נָה column as a form to produce; learn it as a form to recognise. תכתבי, by contrast, is fully alive and has to be produced correctly — using תכתוב to a woman is a straightforward agreement error, not a stylistic choice.
הבנות ישמרו על התיקים ואנחנו נלך להביא קפה.
habanót yishmerú al hatikím va'anákhnu nelékh lehaví kafé
The girls will watch the bags and we'll go and get coffee. (a group of women takes ישמרו in ordinary Hebrew)
The future does far more than refer to the future — it supplies everyday commands (תכתוב לי), everything after כדי ש and אולי, and wishes and suggestions. Those uses are on the future as an imperative and what the future tense actually does.
Common Mistakes
1. Adding the plural ending to the unchanged form. The vowel is not a fixed part of the stem.
❌ הם ישמורו לנו מקום
Incorrect — the cholam drops when ־וּ arrives: ישמרו, yishmerú. The patach class reduces the same way: ילמדו is yilmedú, never yilmadú.
✅ הם ישמרו לנו מקום בשורה הראשונה.
hem yishmerú lánu makóm bashurá harishoná
They'll save us seats in the front row.
2. Giving a feminine subject the י־ prefix. English he will and she will are the same two words, so the split has to be added rather than translated.
❌ היא יסגור את הדלת
Incorrect — the third-person feminine takes ת־, exactly like the second-person masculine: היא תסגור.
✅ היא תסגור את הדלת אחריה, אל תדאג.
hi tisgór et hadélet akharéiha, al tid'ág
She'll shut the door behind her, don't worry. (to a man)
3. Writing a sound root with two yods. The double yod is triggered by a doubled consonant, and a sound-root pa'al has none.
❌ הוא ייסגור את החנות בשמונה
Incorrect — nothing is doubled in yisgór, so it is written with one yod: יסגור. Two yods would be right for ייפול or ייכנס, where the following consonant carries a dagesh.
✅ הוא יסגור את החנות בשמונה וייסע הביתה.
hu yisgór et hakhanút bishmóne veyisá habáyta
He'll close the shop at eight and drive home. (both spellings in one sentence)
4. Building the future out of a helper verb. English needs will; Hebrew has already said it with the prefix.
❌ מחר אני אהיה כותב את המכתב
Incorrect — Hebrew has no 'will be writing' at all. Nothing may stand in front of the verb, because the prefix has already said 'will': מחר אכתוב.
✅ מחר אכתוב את המכתב ואשלח לך אותו לפני הישיבה.
makhár ekhtóv et hamikhtáv ve'eshlákh lekhá otó lifnéi hayeshivá
I'll write the letter tomorrow and send it to you before the meeting. (to a man)
Key Takeaways
- The future is a prefix conjugation: א I, נ we, י he/they, ת you/she, plus ־י for a female addressee and ־וּ for any plural.
- The theme vowel is cholam by default (יִכְתּוֹב, יִשְׁמוֹר, יִסְגּוֹר) but patach for a whole class (יִלְמַד, אֶלְמַד). The class belongs to the individual verb.
- The theme vowel disappears before a suffix: יִכְתּוֹב → יִכְתְּבוּ yikhtevú, יִלְמַד → יִלְמְדוּ yilmedú.
- Ktiv male writes one yod for a sound-root pa'al (יכתוב) and two wherever a chirik stands before a doubled consonant — that covers nif'al (ייכנס) and equally the pa'al of assimilating roots (ייפול, ייתן, ייקח).
- תכתוב is both you (m.) and she, in every verb and every binyan, which is why subject pronouns survive in the future.
- The classical ־נָה forms are normative but effectively absent from speech. Recognise תכתובנה; produce יכתבו and תכתבו. תכתבי is alive and must be produced.
Now practice Hebrew
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Hebrew →Related Topics
- Future Vowel: יִכְתּוֹב vs יִלְמַד vs יִשְׁמַעB1 — Why the pa'al future is יִכְתּוֹב here and יִלְמַד there: a cholam by default, a patach forced by a guttural, and a residue class that simply has to be learned verb by verb — plus the ktiv male spelling trick that tells you which one you are looking at.
- Pa'al Past: Regular Roots (כתבתי, כתבת, כתב…)A2 — The past is a suffix conjugation: nine cells, eight written strings, and a stem that quietly reshuffles its vowels before ־ָה and ־וּ. It is also the one tense where the verb already says who the subject is — which is exactly the licence learners then carry one tense too far.
- Suffix Conjugation vs Prefix ConjugationB1 — Hebrew has exactly two sets of personal affixes — one hung on the end for the past, one bolted on the front for the future — and they are identical in all seven binyanim. Learn the two sets and only the stem is left to learn.
- Using the Future: Prediction, Intention, RequestA2 — One prefix conjugation covers everything English splits between will, shall, going to and the polite question — and it supplies the everyday command on top. Nothing in the form separates those readings, so this page is about what does.
- Nif'al Future: ייכנס, תיכנסי, ניכנסB1 — In the future the נ of nif'al disappears into the first root letter, leaving a dagesh behind — and unpointed that shows up as the two-yod spellings ייכנס, תיכנס, ניכנס, with one cell that pointedly refuses the yod.