יכול yakhól, “can / be able,” is pa'al, root י־כ־ל, but it is defective: it has a fully usable present, past and future, while the ordinary modern language has no imperative, no productive infinitive and no action noun. Those gaps do not make the verb marginal—its surviving forms are among the most frequent in Hebrew—but they do mean that no single dictionary headword can stand for a complete everyday paradigm. The selection contrast is worked through on אפשר or יכול?.
The usable system at a glance
| Part | Core forms | What is unusual |
|---|---|---|
| present | יָכוֹל · יְכוֹלָה · יְכוֹלִים · יְכוֹלוֹת | inflects like an adjective; takes an infinitive complement |
| past | יָכוֹלְתִּי · יָכוֹלְתָּ · יָכְלָה · יָכוֹלְנוּ · יָכְלוּ | rare פָּעֹל pattern; 3ms merges with the present |
| future | אוּכַל · תּוּכַל · יוּכַל · נוּכַל | u-stem visually remote from יכול |
| imperative | — | no usable form |
| infinitive | — in ordinary Modern Hebrew | rare dictionary forms exist; speakers rephrase |
| action noun | — | יְכוֹלֶת is the related noun “ability,” not a regular action noun |
אני לא יכול להמשיך ככה בלי הפסקה.
aní lo yakhól lehamshíkh kákha bli hafsaká
I can't carry on like this without a break. (m. speaker)
היא יכולה לדבר חמש שפות ולקרוא בשלוש מהן.
hi yekholá ledabér khamésh safót velikró bishalósh mehén
She can speak five languages and read three of them.
Present: agreement plus an infinitive
The present behaves morphologically like an adjective: compare גדול / גדולה / גדולים / גדולות with יכול / יכולה / יכולים / יכולות. It agrees with the subject in gender and number, then takes an infinitive naming the action that is possible.
| Agreement | Form | Model phrase |
|---|---|---|
| masculine singular | יָכוֹל yakhól | אני יכול לבוא |
| feminine singular | יְכוֹלָה yekholá | אני יכולה לבוא |
| masculine / mixed plural | יְכוֹלִים yekholím | אנחנו יכולים לבוא |
| feminine plural | יְכוֹלוֹת yekholót | אנחנו יכולות לבוא |
English can is invariant, so the agreement is easy to overlook. Hebrew marks the subject twice when it is overt—once in the pronoun and again on יכול—and only the infinitive remains uninflected.
אתן יכולות לחכות כאן עד שהרופא יתפנה.
atén yekholót lekhakót kan ad sheharofé yitpané
You can wait here until the doctor is free. (to a group of women)
יכול להיות שהוא צודק לגבי המחיר.
yakhól lihyót shehú tsodék legabéi hamekhír
He may be right about the price. (literally 'it can be that')
The fixed impersonal frame יכול להיות ש־ means “it may be that / possibly.” Its masculine singular shape is fixed because there is no referential subject for it to agree with.
Past: familiar spellings, one complete collision
| Person | Past |
|---|---|
| אני | יָכוֹלְתִּי yakhólti |
| אתה | יָכוֹלְתָּ yakhólta |
| את | יָכוֹלְתְּ yakhólt |
| הוא | יָכוֹל yakhól |
| היא | יָכְלָה yakhlá |
| אנחנו | יָכוֹלְנוּ yakhólnu |
| אתם / אתן | יָכוֹלְתֶּם / יָכוֹלְתֶּן yakhóltem / yakhólten |
| הם / הן | יָכְלוּ yakhlú |
Ktiv male preserves the ו in יכולתי, יכולת, יכולנו, יכולתם, but not in יכלה, יכלו, where the stem has no o-vowel. The exceptional cell is 3ms past יכול: it is written and pronounced exactly like masculine-singular present יכול, both yakhól.
הוא יכול להגיע רק בערב.
hu yakhól lehagía rak ba'érev
He can arrive only in the evening / He could arrive only in the evening. (tense comes from context)
When past time must be explicit, ordinary speech strongly prefers היה יכול; יכול היה is common in (formal written) Hebrew. Both avoid asking the reader to recover the tense from context alone.
הוא היה יכול להתקשר, אבל הוא לא התקשר.
hu hayá yakhól lehitkashér, avál hu lo hitkashér
He could have called, but he did not call.
לא יכולתי להגיע אתמול כי הרכבת בוטלה.
lo yakhólti lehagía etmól ki harakévet butlá
I couldn't make it yesterday because the train was cancelled.
Future: memorize יכול / אוכל as a pair
| Person | Future |
|---|---|
| אני | אוּכַל ukhál |
| אתה | תּוּכַל tukhál |
| את | תּוּכְלִי tukhlí |
| הוא | יוּכַל yukhál |
| היא | תּוּכַל tukhál |
| אנחנו | נוּכַל nukhál |
| אתם / אתן | תּוּכְלוּ tukhlú |
| הם / הן | יוּכְלוּ yukhlú |
The future is a u-stem whose connection to יכול is no longer visually transparent. The practical pair is therefore יכול / אוכל, not a rule applied to י־כ־ל. Modern plural future forms serve all genders; תוכלנה is (literary).
תוכל לעזור לי רגע עם המזוודה?
tukhál la'azór li réga im hamizvadá?
Could you help me with the suitcase for a moment? (to a man)
נוכל לדבר אחרי שתסיים את הפגישה?
nukhál ledabér akharéi shetesayém et hapgishá?
Will we be able to talk after you finish the meeting? (to a man)
אוכל: four everyday words
Unpointed אוכל is one of Hebrew's densest collisions:
| Pointed ktiv male | Reading | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| אוֹכֶל | ókhel | food |
| אוֹכֵל | okhél | eats / is eating (m.sg.) |
| אוֹכַל | okhál | I will eat |
| אוּכַל | ukhál | I will be able |
An infinitive directly after אוכל strongly favours ukhál: אוכל לעזור “I will be able to help.” A direct object or food context favours a form of אכל, while an adjective after the noun favours “food.”
אוכל לעזור לך אחרי שאוכל משהו.
ukhál la'azór lekhá akharéi she'okhál máshehu
I'll be able to help you after I eat something. (to a man; two readings of אוכל)
האוכל פה מצוין, אבל אני לא אוכל הרבה בערב.
ha'ókhel po metsuyán, avál aní lo okhél harbé ba'érev
The food here is excellent, but I don't eat much in the evening. (m. speaker; two more readings)
The missing infinitive and imperative
Pealim lists the artificial dictionary headword לוּכַל (bare לוכל) and also לִיכֹל (bare ליכול). Neither is an ordinary productive Modern Hebrew infinitive. Speakers fill the slot with להיות מסוגל “to be capable,” or rebuild the sentence around a finite form such as שאוכל “that I can / will be able.”
אני רוצה להיות מסוגלת לנהל את זה לבד.
aní rotsá lihyót mesugélet lenahél et ze levád
I want to be able to manage this on my own. (f. speaker)
אני מקווה שאוכל לסיים עד יום חמישי.
aní mekavé she'ukhál lesayém ad yom khamishí
I hope I'll be able to finish by Thursday.
There is no imperative. That is a genuine paradigm gap, not a register choice. Hebrew instead commands the action itself, or uses a different predicate: תנסה לפתוח “try to open,” תהיה מסוגל “be capable” in the rare contexts where such wording makes sense. The related noun יכולת means “ability / capability,” but it does not function as the action noun of an event of “being able.”
Ability, possibility and permission
Three neighbouring words answer different questions:
| Form | Core job | Grammar |
|---|---|---|
| יכול | a person's ability or circumstantial possibility | agrees with that person + infinitive |
| אפשר | impersonal possibility: “is it possible?” | invariant + infinitive |
| מותר | permission under a rule: “is it allowed?” | impersonal in this use + infinitive |
At a till, אפשר לשלם באשראי? asks whether card payment is possible there. אתה יכול לשלם באשראי? asks a particular man whether he can pay by card. מותר לשלם באשראי? is possible only where payment method is being treated as a matter of permission, which is not normally the practical question.
אפשר לשלם באשראי או שצריך מזומן?
efshár leshalém be'ashráy o shetsaríkh mezumán?
Can we pay by card, or do we need cash? (impersonal possibility)
אתה יכול לשלם עכשיו ואני אחזיר לך אחר כך?
atá yakhól leshalém akhsháv va'aní akhzír lekhá akhár kakh?
Can you pay now and I'll pay you back later? (to a man; personal ability)
Key Takeaways
- “Defective” here means that present, past and future are usable, but imperative, everyday infinitive and action noun are absent.
- Present יכול / יכולה / יכולים / יכולות agrees like an adjective and takes an infinitive.
- Past 3ms יכול is identical in spelling and pronunciation to present 3ms; היה יכול makes past time explicit.
- Memorise the future pair יכול / אוכל: אוכל, תוכל, יוכל, נוכל, תוכלו, יוכלו.
- Bare אוכל is food, eating, “I will eat,” or “I will be able”; syntax identifies the reading.
- Rephrase the missing infinitive with להיות מסוגל or a finite ש־ clause, and choose אפשר or מותר when the question is impersonal possibility or permission.
Now practice Hebrew
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Hebrew →Related Topics
- יכול: The Verb With No Real FutureB1 — Four cells of one paradigm, built four different ways: a present that inflects like an adjective, a past on the rare פָּעֹל pattern, a future on a u-stem that looks like it came from another binyan, and an infinitive that exists only on paper.
- יכול: Can, May, MightA2 — Use the agreeing verb יכול for ability, permission, and possibility, and choose its irregular past and future forms accurately.
- אפשר or יכול?A2 — Both come out as can in English, and the difference is not strength but whether anybody is named. יכול belongs to a person and agrees with them; אפשר belongs to nobody and never changes shape at all — which is exactly why it is what Israelis say at a till.
- Negating a Modal: לא צריך vs אין צורךB2 — Map each English negative modal to its Hebrew lexical counterpart: לא חייב removes obligation, אסור imposes prohibition, אי אפשר denies possibility, and formal prose often uses אין plus a noun.