αξίζει (to be worth)

Learners usually meet impersonal αξίζει να…, “it is worth…,” but αξίζω is also a fully personal verb: “be worth” or “deserve.” Its unusual feature is morphological, not syntactic: Standard Modern Greek gives it an imperfective stem but no productive perfective stem.

Αξίζεις κάτι καλύτερο από αυτή τη δουλειά.

aksízis káti kalítero apó aftí ti dhuliá

You deserve something better than this job.

Το ποδήλατο αξίζει τα λεφτά του.

to podhílato aksízi ta leftá tu

The bicycle is worth its price.

The live paradigm—and the gap

SlotFormsStatus
Presentαξίζω, αξίζεις, αξίζει, αξίζουμε, αξίζετε, αξίζουνlive
Imperfectάξιζα, άξιζες, άξιζε, αξίζαμε, αξίζατε, άξιζανalso carries bounded past reference
Continuous futureθα αξίζω / αξίζει / αξίζουνlive
Aorist / dependent perfectiveDoes not exist: no ×άξισα or ×αξίσω
Simple future / perfectDoes not exist: no ×θα αξίσει or ×έχω αξίσει
ImperativeNo ordinary imperative is used
MediopassiveDoes not exist in the standard paradigm

This is genuine lexical aspectual defectiveness. Most Greek verbs contrast an imperfective and a perfective stem; the system is introduced on imperfective vs perfective. Here there is no second stem to choose. άξιζε can therefore describe a continuing valuation or a completed experience whose English translation is simple “was worth.”

The defect does not make the verb impersonal. Present and imperfect forms still agree normally with their subjects: εγώ αξίζω, εσύ αξίζεις, τα κοσμήματα αξίζουν. What is absent is an aspectual column, not a set of persons. This distinction matters because many learners see frequent third-person αξίζει and mistakenly analyze the whole verb on the model of frozen πρέπει.

Άξιζε η αναμονή· η συναυλία ήταν εκπληκτική.

áksize i anamoní; i sinavlía ítan ekpliktikí

The wait was worth it; the concert was amazing.

Όταν ήταν καινούριο, το σπίτι άξιζε πολύ περισσότερο.

ótan ítan kenúrio, to spíti áksize polí perisótero

When it was new, the house used to be worth much more.

Αξίζουμε τη στήριξή σας και θα το αποδείξουμε.

aksízume ti stíriksí sas ke tha to apodhíksume

We deserve your support, and we will prove it.

💡
Do not translate imperfect άξιζε mechanically as “used to be worth.” Because this verb has no aorist, the same form also covers a completed judgement: “the trip was worth it.”

Government

There are three frames. Personal αξίζω + accusative means “be worth/deserve”: αξίζει τον κόπο, αξίζεις σεβασμό. Impersonal αξίζει + να-clause is covered with other modal frames on impersonal verbs plus να. In μου αξίζει + nominative, the deserved thing is the subject and the person is a genitive experiencer.

Σου αξίζει μια δεύτερη ευκαιρία.

su aksízi mia dhéfteri efkería

You deserve a second chance.

Δεν μου άξιζε τέτοια μεταχείριση.

dhen mu áksize tétia metachírisi

I didn't deserve such treatment.

English normally makes the deserving person the subject—“you deserve a chance.” Greek can do that with an accusative object, but the very common σου αξίζει μια ευκαιρία reverses the roles. That pattern is developed under the genitive experiencer.

The two personal meanings also differ subtly. With a person as subject, αξίζω σεβασμό evaluates merit: “deserve respect.” With a product or experience as subject, αξίζει τα λεφτά / τον κόπο evaluates value relative to money, time, or effort. The morphology is identical; the complement and the kind of subject supply the interpretation.

Η διαδρομή είναι δύσκολη, αλλά αξίζει τον κόπο.

i dhiadhromí íne dhískoli, alá aksízi ton kópo

The route is difficult, but it is worth the effort.

Set phrases

  • αξίζει τον κόπο — it is worth the effort
  • δεν αξίζει μια δεκάρα — it is not worth a penny
  • αξίζεις τα λεφτά σου — you earn/justify your pay
  • μου αξίζει κάτι καλύτερο — I deserve something better
  • άξιζε η αναμονή — the wait was worth it

Δεν αξίζει μια δεκάρα μετά από τόσες ζημιές.

dhen aksízi mia dhekára metá apó tósses zimiés

It isn't worth a penny after so much damage.

Αξίζει να το δεις πριν φύγει από τους κινηματογράφους.

aksízi na to dhis prin fíyi apó tus kinimatoghráfus

It's worth seeing before it leaves cinemas.

Common Mistakes

❌ Μετά την επισκευή θα αξίσει περισσότερο.

Incorrect — αξίζω has no simple-future form αξίσει.

✅ Μετά την επισκευή θα αξίζει περισσότερο.

metá tin episkeví tha aksízi perisótero

After the repair it will be worth more.

Key Takeaways

  • αξίζω · άξιζα · θα αξίζω; no aorist, perfective dependent form, simple future, perfect, ordinary imperative, or mediopassive is used.
  • άξιζε can carry both continuing and completed past reference.
  • Separate direct-object αξίζω from experiencer μου αξίζει + nominative.

Now practice Greek

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Greek

Related Topics

  • πρέπει (must/have to)A2A defective-form inventory for impersonal πρέπει, kept distinct from the third-person verb πρέπω and its surviving formal active participle πρέπων.
  • αρέσω (μου αρέσει — to like)A2The complete active paradigm behind μου αρέσει, including its overlapping past forms, subject agreement, genitive experiencer, and the separate formal verb αρέσκομαι.
  • Impersonal ConstructionsB1Map Greek impersonal frames by the complement they select: bare weather predicates, modal and evaluative να-clauses, factual που-clauses, and propositional ότι/πως-clauses.
  • Impersonal πρέπει / μπορεί ναB1The two invariable modal frames — πρέπει να for obligation ('must / have to') and μπορεί να for possibility ('may / might') — where the modal never changes and the person is carried by the να-verb, plus their pasts έπρεπε να and μπορεί να + past.
  • Nominalized να-Clauses (το να...)B2Put the article το in front of a να-clause and the whole clause becomes a noun — Greek's equivalent of the English '-ing' subject or 'to'-infinitive: Το να μαθαίνεις γλώσσες ανοίγει μυαλά, Δεν μου αρέσει το να περιμένω, Με το να φωνάζεις δεν κερδίζεις τίποτα.
  • Principal Parts: Complete IndexA2A consolidated index of the principal parts of 151 frequent Modern Greek verbs, including defective and register-limited paradigms.