Resumptive Pronouns in που-Clauses | Greek Grammar

This is the mechanism that makes the whole invariable-relativizer system work, and it is the piece most courses skip. που is a single unchanging syllable: it announces a relative clause and says nothing whatever about what the relativized thing is doing in there. In a great many clauses that silence costs nothing. In the rest, something else has to speak — and what speaks is a small unstressed pronoun, a clitic, sitting inside the clause in its ordinary place.

Greek learners who never internalise this produce sentences that are grammatical word by word and broken as wholes. Greek listeners who hear one know instantly that something is missing, because the clause has an argument slot standing open with nothing in it.

Why a gap works for some roles and not others

The logic is recoverability. A Greek verb comes with a frame: διάβασα announces a first-person subject and an accusative object, έδωσα announces a subject, an accusative object and a genitive recipient. When a relative clause leaves out its subject, nothing is ambiguous — the verb ending has already told you who it is, and Greek is a pro-drop language that leaves subjects out all day long. When a restrictive clause leaves out its direct object, the verb still tells you there is one, and the antecedent is the only candidate.

Beyond those two roles, the verb frame stops helping. Nothing in έδωσα το δώρο points at a recipient; nothing in μιλήσαμε points at a topic. In an ordinary sentence, case endings and prepositions supply that information — and που has neither. So the clause supplies it itself, with a pronoun.

There is also a hard structural fact behind the subject row of the table below: Greek has no nominative clitic. The weak pronoun series has accusative and genitive forms and stops there. A subject could not be resumed by a clitic even if the language wanted one there — which is a tidy piece of confirmation that resumption is about recovering case, not about filling a hole.

The rule, role by role

Role inside the που-clause	What appears in the clause	Example
Subject	nothing — no clitic exists for it	ο ταξιτζής που μας πήγε
Direct object, restrictive clause	nothing	το ποδήλατο που αγόρασα
Direct object, non-restrictive clause	accusative clitic, expected	ο Νίκος, που τον ξέρεις
Indirect object / genitive person	genitive clitic, required	η γυναίκα που της έδωσα το δώρο
Possessor ("whose")	genitive clitic on the possessed noun, required	ο συγγραφέας που διάβασα το βιβλίο του
Object of a preposition	preposition + strong pronoun, or an adverb, required	ο φίλος που πήγα μαζί του
Place or time	nothing — που covers it itself	το εστιατόριο που φάγαμε

Read the table as one rule plus two riders: a resumptive is required wherever the role is genitive or prepositional — except when the relationship is simply place or time, and with the direct object splitting on restrictive against non-restrictive.

The direct-object row is the one that splits, and it is worth pausing on. In a restrictive clause — the kind that picks one thing out of several — the object slot stays empty: το ποδήλατο που αγόρασα, never ×που το αγόρασα. In a non-restrictive clause, where the antecedent is already fully identified and the commas are doing the work, the clitic appears and its absence is what sounds wrong.

Ο Νίκος, που τον ξέρεις από το γυμνάσιο, άνοιξε δικό του μαγαζί.

o Níkos, pu ton kséris apó to yimnásio, ánikse dhikó tu maghazí

Nikos, whom you know from secondary school, has opened his own shop.

The genitive: recipients and affected people

This is the highest-frequency use and the one to drill. Every verb that takes a genitive person — λέω, δίνω, στέλνω, τηλεφωνώ, ζητάω, υπόσχομαι, εξηγώ, απαντάω — needs its genitive clitic inside the relative clause.

Η γυναίκα που της έδωσα το δώρο δεν το άνοιξε καν.

i yinéka pu tis édhosa to dhóro dhen to ánikse kan

The woman I gave the present to didn't even open it.

Ο υπάλληλος που του ζήτησα βοήθεια μου γύρισε την πλάτη.

o ipálilos pu tu zítisa voíthia mu yírise tin pláti

The clerk I asked for help turned his back on me.

Οι γείτονες που τους αφήσαμε τα κλειδιά πότισαν τα φυτά.

i yítones pu tus afísame ta klidhiá pótisan ta fitá

The neighbours we left the keys with watered the plants.

Word for word: "the woman that I-gave to-her the present". English has nothing at that spot, which is precisely why the clitic goes missing in learner Greek. Note also that the case is not yours to choose — it comes from the verb, exactly as it does in any other sentence, and the genitive-versus-accusative decision is stored with the verb.

The same applies to the genitive of the person an event simply happens to, which is one of the constructions English has no name for.

Η γειτόνισσα που της έκλεψαν το αυτοκίνητο έβαλε συναγερμό παντού.

i yitónisa pu tis éklepsan to aftokínito évale sinayermó pandú

The neighbour whose car got stolen has put alarms on everything.

The possessor: "whose", without ο οποίος

Here the clitic does not go in front of the verb. It goes on the possessed noun, exactly where an ordinary possessive would sit, and the result is the everyday spoken equivalent of του οποίου.

Ο συγγραφέας που διάβασα το πρώτο του βιβλίο πέθανε πέρσι.

o singraféas pu dhiávasa to próto tu vivlío péthane pérsi

The writer whose first book I read died last year.

Η γειτόνισσα που ο σκύλος της γαβγίζει όλη νύχτα μετακόμισε επιτέλους.

i yitónisa pu o skílos tis ghavyízi óli níchta metakómise epitélus

The neighbour whose dog barks all night has finally moved out.

Both positions the possessive clitic normally has are available — το πρώτο *του βιβλίο and το πρώτο βιβλίο του are equally correct here, on the same terms as anywhere else (possessive clitics). What is not available is leaving it out. Without the του*, the second sentence above says the neighbour whose the dog barks, and the listener waits for a possessor that never arrives.

💡

Translate "whose" by rebuilding, not by substituting. Say the clause to yourself as an independent sentence first — διάβασα το πρώτο του βιβλίο, ο σκύλος της γαβγίζει — and then bolt ο συγγραφέας που / η γειτόνισσα που onto the front. The clitic is already in place, because it was there before you built the relative clause.

Prepositional objects, in one paragraph

When the role is governed by a preposition, the resumptive is a strong pronoun after that preposition (γι' αυτόν, σ' αυτήν, μ' αυτό), a place adverb (μέσα, εκεί), or the genitive clitic that μαζί demands. That whole territory, including the formal με τον οποίο alternative and paired versions of the same sentence, belongs to relatives after prepositions — take the rule from here and the sentences from there.

Το θέμα που μιλήσαμε γι' αυτό στη σύσκεψη δεν λύθηκε ποτέ.

to théma pu milísame y' aftó sti sískepsi dhen líthike poté

The subject we talked about in the meeting never got resolved.

Place and time need nothing

The systematic exception, and the reason a blanket "obliques need a resumptive" rule would be wrong. που began life as a place word, and with a place or time antecedent it still carries that meaning by itself.

Το εστιατόριο που φάγαμε την Παρασκευή έκλεισε μέσα σε έναν μήνα.

to estiatório pu fághame tin Paraskeví éklise mésa se énan mína

The restaurant we ate at on Friday shut down within a month.

Η μέρα που ξεκίνησα τη δουλειά ήταν και η πιο κρύα του χρόνου.

i méra pu ksekínisa ti dhuliá ítan ke i pio kría tu chrónu

The day I started the job was also the coldest of the year.

Adding a pronoun to either sentence is not a mistake — το εστιατόριο που φάγαμε εκεί is perfectly sayable — but it is not required, and the bare version is what a Greek speaker produces first.

Where the resumptive stands

The resumptive is an ordinary clitic and obeys the ordinary rules with no exceptions of its own: immediately in front of the finite verb, behind δεν, θα, να and the rest, with nothing allowed in between. That machinery is on where clitics go.

Ο πελάτης που δεν του απαντήσαμε έγραψε καταγγελία στο υπουργείο.

o pelátis pu dhen tu apandísame éghrapse katangelía sto ipuryío

The customer we never replied to filed a complaint with the ministry.

Ο φίλος που θα του δανείσω το αυτοκίνητο οδηγεί δέκα χρόνια.

o fílos pu tha tu dhaníso to aftokínito odhiyí dhéka chrónia

The friend I'm going to lend the car to has been driving for ten years.

This is not clitic doubling

The two constructions look similar on the page and are doing opposite jobs, and keeping them apart is worth the paragraph.

In clitic doubling, the full noun phrase and the clitic are in the same clause — Της Μαρίας της έστειλα μήνυμα — the clitic carries the grammar, the noun phrase carries the discourse, and the doubling is a choice about information structure. In a relative clause the antecedent is outside the clause altogether; the clitic is not repeating anything that is present, it is the only marker of a role that would otherwise be unexpressed. It is grammatically required, it carries no topic or focus meaning, and you cannot drop it to make the sentence neutral.

One practical consequence: doubling is banned with question words, negatives and non-specific objects, because those cannot be topics. None of that applies to a resumptive. Δεν υπάρχει κανείς που να του άρεσε is fine, because του is not a topic marker — it is case.

Register

Resumption is not a colloquialism. Where the rule requires a clitic, the clitic appears in a newspaper as readily as in a conversation. What is register-marked is the wider choice: preferring που plus a resumptive over ο οποίος skews spoken and informal, and formal writing shifts the balance the other way — a trade-off laid out on που vs ο οποίος. The clitic itself is neutral.

Common Mistakes

1. Leaving out the genitive clitic. The core error, and it comes straight from English, which has no word in that slot either.

❌ Ο φίλος που είπα το μυστικό μου το κοινοποίησε σε όλη τη γειτονιά.

Incorrect — λέω takes a genitive person, and που cannot carry it: που του είπα το μυστικό μου.

✅ Ο φίλος που του είπα το μυστικό μου το κοινοποίησε σε όλη τη γειτονιά.

o fílos pu tu ípa to mistikó mu to kinopíise se óli ti yitoniá

The friend I told my secret to broadcast it round the whole neighbourhood.

2. Leaving out the possessive clitic. English whose disappears into the Greek noun phrase, so learners produce a possessed noun with no possessor.

❌ Ο σκηνοθέτης που είδαμε την τελευταία ταινία ήρθε στο φεστιβάλ.

Incorrect — nothing marks the possessor; the noun needs the clitic: την τελευταία του ταινία.

✅ Ο σκηνοθέτης που είδαμε την τελευταία του ταινία ήρθε στο φεστιβάλ.

o skinothétis pu ídhame tin teleftéa tu tenía írthe sto festivál

The director whose latest film we saw came to the festival.

3. Resuming the subject. Once the mechanism clicks, the temptation is to apply it everywhere. The subject slot takes nothing at all: no clitic exists for it, and a strong pronoun in that position is not resumption — Greek reads it as contrastive focus, so the clause stops saying what you meant.

❌ Ο άντρας που αυτός φώναζε στη στάση έφυγε τρέχοντας.

Incorrect for this meaning — που leaves the subject slot empty and the verb ending already identifies it. αυτός there is heard as 'that one, as opposed to the other', not as a resumptive.

✅ Ο άντρας που φώναζε στη στάση έφυγε τρέχοντας μόλις ήρθε το λεωφορείο.

o ándras pu fónaze sti stási éfiye tréchondas mólis írthe to leoforío

The man who was shouting at the stop ran off the moment the bus came.

4. Stacking a resumptive on top of ο οποίος. ο οποίος already carries the case; adding a clitic marks the same role twice and the clause has two fillers for one slot.

❌ Ο πελάτης στον οποίο του υποσχεθήκαμε έκπτωση περιμένει ακόμα.

Incorrect — the case is already on στον οποίο; the clitic has no role left to mark.

✅ Ο πελάτης στον οποίο υποσχεθήκαμε έκπτωση περιμένει ακόμα.

o pelátis ston opío iposchethíkame ékptosi periméni akóma

The customer we promised a discount to is still waiting.

5. Applying one direct-object rule to both kinds of clause. The commas decide. A restrictive object clause takes nothing; a non-restrictive one takes the clitic, and dropping it there is as noticeable as leaving it out of a genitive clause.

Ο καφές που παρήγγειλα δεν ήρθε ποτέ.

o kafés pu paríngila dhen írthe poté

The coffee I ordered never came. (restrictive — the clause identifies which coffee, and the object slot stays empty)

Αυτός ο καφές, που τον παρήγγειλα πριν από μισή ώρα, είναι ακόμα στην κουζίνα.

aftós o kafés, pu ton paríngila prin apó misí óra, íne akóma stin kuzína

This coffee, which I ordered half an hour ago, is still in the kitchen. (non-restrictive — the coffee is already identified, and the clitic is what a Greek speaker produces)

Key Takeaways

που carries no case, so any role it cannot leave to the verb frame has to be marked inside the clause by a clitic.
Required for the genitive — indirect objects, affected persons, and possessors — and for prepositional objects.
Absent for the subject (Greek has no nominative clitic) and for place and time, where που carries the meaning itself.
The direct object splits on the commas: nothing in a restrictive clause (το ποδήλατο που αγόρασα), a clitic in a non-restrictive one (ο Νίκος, που τον ξέρεις…).
The possessor clitic goes on the possessed noun, not in front of the verb: που διάβασα το βιβλίο του, που ο σκύλος της γαβγίζει.
The case of the clitic comes from the verb, exactly as in any other clause: genitive in που του μίλησα, accusative in η Άννα, που την είδα χθες.
It sits where every clitic sits — immediately before the finite verb, behind δεν, θα and να.
It is not clitic doubling: the antecedent is outside the clause, the clitic is obligatory, and it carries no topic or focus meaning.
Resumption itself is register-neutral; only the wider που-versus-ο οποίος choice is register-marked.

Now practice Greek

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Greek →