English has one tidy way to announce that something exists: there is, there are. German's main equivalent is es gibt — literally "it gives" — and it behaves nothing like its English cousin. It always takes the accusative case, it never changes for plural, and it competes with a second construction, es ist / es sind, that English collapses into the very same words. Sorting out es gibt versus es ist/sind is a small but high-frequency win: you use one of these constructions in almost every paragraph of real German.
es gibt: the default "there is / there are"
Whenever you want to state that something exists, is available, or can be found — in the world, in a town, on a menu, in a situation — German reaches for es gibt. Crucially, es gibt keeps the verb in the third-person singular gibt no matter how many things you are talking about, and it puts whatever exists into the accusative case, because grammatically that noun is the object of geben ("to give"), not the subject.
In meiner Stadt gibt es einen großen Park.
In my town there is a big park.
Es gibt viele Probleme mit dem neuen System.
There are many problems with the new system.
Look at the second sentence carefully. English switches from there is to there are because problems is plural — the verb agrees with the plural. German does not. Es gibt stays exactly the same; only the noun goes plural. The verb gibt is locked.
Why the accusative, and why no plural
The logic is hidden in the literal meaning. Geben means to give, so es gibt einen Park is, word for word, "it gives a park" — and the giver (es) is the grammatical subject while the thing given (einen Park) is the direct object. Direct objects take the accusative. That single fact explains both quirks at once: the noun is accusative because it is an object, and the verb stays gibt because the real subject is the unchanging dummy es, not the thing that exists. English builds "there are" around the existing thing and makes the verb agree with it; German builds es gibt around an invisible giver and leaves the verb frozen.
This is why the masculine accusative ending -en shows up so often after es gibt — it is the clearest signal that the case is accusative and not nominative.
Gibt es hier einen Supermarkt in der Nähe?
Is there a supermarket nearby?
Auf der Speisekarte gibt es heute frischen Fisch und einen Salat.
On the menu today there's fresh fish and a salad.
Es gibt keinen Grund zur Sorge.
There's no reason to worry.
The negation kein also goes accusative here: keinen Grund, not kein Grund. Same rule, same reason.
es ist / es sind: existence at a specific place
The second construction is es ist (singular) and es sind (plural), and unlike es gibt, it does agree with its subject. Use it when you are pointing at the presence of someone or something at a specific, identifiable place — who or what is there, in this room, at the door, in the picture. Here the noun is the real grammatical subject, so it goes into the nominative, and the verb agrees with it.
Es ist niemand da.
There's nobody there. / Nobody's home.
Es sind drei Leute im Wartezimmer.
There are three people in the waiting room.
In es sind drei Leute, the verb is plural sind because drei Leute is the subject in the nominative — the exact mirror image of es gibt, where the verb never moves.
A useful way to feel the difference: es gibt answers does X exist at all / is X available?; es ist / es sind answers who or what is present right there? If you can point to the spot, you are usually in es-ist/sind territory; if you are making a general claim about existence or availability, you are in es-gibt territory.
In dieser Gegend gibt es kaum Restaurants.
In this area there are hardly any restaurants. (general existence → es gibt)
Schau mal, es sind noch zwei Stühle frei.
Look, there are still two chairs free. (visible, present here → es sind)
A side-by-side feel for the choice
| es gibt | es ist / es sind | |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | X exists / is available (in general) | X is present at this specific place |
| Case of the noun | accusative (it's the object) | nominative (it's the subject) |
| Number agreement | none — always gibt | yes — ist / sind |
| Example | Es gibt einen Bahnhof. | Es ist jemand an der Tür. |
es gibt with weather, time, and idioms
Es gibt also carries a set of fixed, everyday meanings beyond bare existence. It predicts weather (Es gibt Regen — it's going to rain), announces what's for a meal (Was gibt es zum Abendessen?), and appears in the famous reproach Das gibt's doch nicht! ("That's impossible! / No way!"). These are worth memorizing as chunks.
Morgen gibt es bestimmt Schnee.
Tomorrow there'll definitely be snow.
Was gibt es heute zum Mittagessen?
What's for lunch today?
The wider family: impersonal es
Es gibt is one member of a larger group of impersonal constructions, where es is a grammatical placeholder rather than a real "it." German uses impersonal es for weather (Es regnet, it's raining), physical sensations (Es ist mir kalt / Mir ist kalt, I'm cold), and as a dummy subject that fills the front slot before the real subject (Es kamen viele Gäste, many guests came). In all of these, es has no referent — it is just holding the subject position open, the same job it does in es gibt. Recognizing this shared role helps you see es gibt not as a weird idiom but as one predictable case of German's love of placeholder es.
Es klopft an der Tür — kannst du aufmachen?
Someone's knocking at the door — can you open it?
Common Mistakes
❌ Es gibt ein Park in der Stadt.
Incorrect — the object after es gibt must be accusative, not nominative.
✅ Es gibt einen Park in der Stadt.
There's a park in the town.
The thing that exists is the object of geben, so it takes the accusative: einen Park, not ein Park.
❌ Es geben viele Touristen hier.
Incorrect — es gibt never agrees with a plural.
✅ Es gibt viele Touristen hier.
There are lots of tourists here.
English there are tempts you to pluralize the verb. German keeps gibt frozen; only the noun is plural.
❌ Es ist viele Möglichkeiten.
Incorrect — using es ist for general existence, and not agreeing with the plural.
✅ Es gibt viele Möglichkeiten.
There are many possibilities.
For general existence, use es gibt. (If you did want the es ist/sind family, it would have to agree: Es sind viele Möglichkeiten — but that reads as "present right here," which usually isn't the intended sense.)
❌ Es gibt niemand zu Hause.
Incorrect — presence at a specific place calls for es ist, not es gibt.
✅ Es ist niemand zu Hause.
Nobody's home.
Pointing at a specific place ("at home, right now") is es ist/sind territory.
Key Takeaways
- es gibt = "there is/are" for general existence and availability. It always takes the accusative and never pluralizes: Es gibt einen Grund / Es gibt drei Gründe.
- The accusative and the frozen verb both follow from the literal meaning "it gives": the existing thing is an object, and the real subject is the dummy es.
- es ist / es sind = presence at a specific place; the noun is nominative and the verb agrees (Es ist niemand da / Es sind drei Leute im Raum).
- es gibt belongs to German's larger family of impersonal es constructions (weather, sensations, placeholder subjects), where es is a slot-filler with no referent.
Now practice German
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning German→Related Topics
- The Many Uses of esB1 — es is far more than 'it' — it is a neuter pronoun, an impersonal subject, a positional dummy that holds the front slot, and an anticipatory correlate for clauses.
- Expressions with geben and es gibtB1 — The invariable es gibt + accusative ('there is/are'), plus the rich family of geben idioms from Bescheid geben to das gibt's doch nicht!
- Impersonal Verbs and es-SubjectsB1 — Verbs that take the dummy subject es, and why German says 'to me it is cold' instead of 'I am cold.'
- The Accusative CaseA1 — The accusative marks the direct object — and because only masculine articles visibly change, masculine 'den/einen' is the system's single biggest stumbling block.
- Placeholder es and the VorfeldB2 — The dummy es that fills the first slot of a German clause to satisfy verb-second — and vanishes the instant any real constituent is fronted.
- The Impersonal Pronoun manA2 — man means 'one / you / they / people in general,' always takes a singular verb, borrows its oblique forms from einer, and is German's everyday substitute for the passive.