Relative Clauses of Time and Place

Persian identifies a time or place by placing که after a temporal or locative antecedent: روزی که رسیدیم “the day when we arrived,” جایی که منتظر بودیم “the place where we waited.” Unlike English, Persian has no separate relative adverbs corresponding exactly to when and where. Invariant که introduces the relative clause; the antecedent’s meaning and any resumptive expression inside the clause establish the time or place relation.

The main patterns

Antecedent typeTypical frameInternal relation
light time nounروزی/زمانی/وقتی که + clauseoften an understood time gap
light place nounجایی که + clauseoften an understood place gap
lexical time antecedentدورانی که در آن + clauseresumptive در آن realizes the oblique relation
lexical place antecedentشهری که در آن + clausepreposition + resumptive pronoun

روزی که قرارداد را امضا کردیم هوا برفی بود.

ruzi ke qarârdâd râ emzâ kardim havâ barfi bud.

The day we signed the contract, it was snowy. (neutral; understood time gap)

بالاخره جایی پیدا کردیم که بتوانیم با آرامش صحبت کنیم.

bâlâkhare jâ-yi peydâ kardim ke be-tavânim bâ ârâmesh sohbat konim.

We finally found a place where we could talk in peace. (neutral; place antecedent plus purpose/possibility)

The first که does not mean a special temporal “when”; the noun روز supplies time. In the second, جا supplies place. This is the same invariant relative marker introduced on Basic Relative Clauses with که.

زمانی که and وقتی که

زمانی که is common in careful and formal prose. وقتی که is neutral across writing and speech; وقتی without که is also frequent in conversation. These expressions may identify a particular time or function more generally as “when” clauses.

زمانی که این تصمیم گرفته شد، اطلاعات کامل در دسترس نبود.

zamâni ke in tasmim gerefte shod, ettelâ'ât-e kâmel dar dastres na-bud.

At the time when this decision was made, complete information was not available. (formal-neutral; time frame)

وقتی که به ایستگاه رسیدیم، قطار رفته بود.

vaqti ke be istgâh residim, qatâr rafte bud.

When we reached the station, the train had left. (neutral narrative; temporal clause)

The boundary between a headed relative and a temporal conjunction is genuinely gradual. آن زمانی که... clearly points to an antecedent “that time”; bare وقتی که... often functions simply as a clause linker. This page focuses on how the nominal meaning supports identification and resumption, not on retelling the whole tense system for time clauses.

Demonstratives sharpen reference: همان روزی که “the very day when,” آن لحظه‌ای که “that moment when.”

همان لحظه‌ای که در را باز کردم تلفن زنگ خورد.

hamân lahze-i ke dar râ bâz kardam telefon zang khord.

At the very moment I opened the door, the phone rang. (neutral; sharply identified time)

💡
If English when can be paraphrased as “at the time that,” Persian can often use زمانی که/وقتی که. If a specific noun such as “day,” “year,” or “moment” matters, retain that noun before که.

جایی که and place identification

جایی که can mean “a/the place where” or serve as a general locative frame. همان جایی که identifies a previously established location; هر جایی که produces free choice and belongs to the free-relative system.

همان جایی که دیروز منتظر بودیم کیفم را پیدا کردم.

hamân jâ-yi ke diruz montazer budim keyf-am râ peydâ kardam.

I found my bag in the same place where we waited yesterday. (neutral; identified place)

این میز را جایی بگذار که نور کافی داشته باشد.

in miz râ jâ-yi be-gozâr ke nur-e kâfi dâshte bâshad.

Put this desk somewhere that has enough light. (neutral; nonspecific place selected by a property)

In the first, the relative clause contains an understood locative relation: “we waited there.” In the second, جایی is itself the subject of نور کافی داشته باشد: “a place that has enough light.” Antecedent semantics does not always mean that an internal locative gap is present; analyze the role the head would have inside the clause.

When در آن is needed

When a lexical antecedent such as شهر، ساختمان، دوره، سال has a prepositional role inside the relative clause, standard Persian normally realizes that oblique relation with a resumptive such as در آن “in it.” This requirement comes from the predicate’s relation—living in a city or working during a period—not from the noun’s meaning alone. Persian does not strand در at the end as English can strand in.

شیراز شهری است که سال‌های دانشجویی‌ام را در آن گذراندم.

Shirâz shahri ast ke sâl-hâ-ye dâneshju-yi-am râ dar ân gozarândam.

Shiraz is a city in which I spent my university years. (formal-neutral; locative resumptive در آن)

دورانی که در آن کار از راه دور رایج شد، بسیاری از عادت‌ها تغییر کرد.

dowrâni ke dar ân kâr az râh-e dur râyej shod, besyâri az âdat-hâ taghyir kard.

During the period in which remote work became common, many habits changed. (formal; temporal resumptive در آن)

ساختمونی که توش کار می‌کنم نزدیک متروئه.

sâkhtemuni ke tu-sh kâr mi-konam nazdik-e metro-e.

The building I work in is near the metro. (informal, regional: Tehran; resumptive توش)

Colloquial توش is the spoken counterpart of a locative resumptive, not appropriate in formal writing. Full در آن is clear and register-neutral in careful prose. With semantically light جایی که, omitting an overt resumptive is often natural and avoids heavy جایی که در آن unless formality or complexity motivates it.

💡
Use در آن when a lexical place or period fills a در-phrase required inside the relative clause. With light linker-like جایی که/زمانی که, the locative or temporal relation is often recoverable without an overt resumptive.

Restrictive versus parenthetical punctuation

A restrictive clause identifies which time or place is meant and is not separated from its head by a comma: روزی که رسیدیم. A parenthetical clause adds information about an already identified referent and is set off by commas or pauses.

یزد، شهری که چند سال در آن زندگی کردم، تابستان‌های بسیار گرمی دارد.

Yazd, shahri ke chand sâl dar ân zendegi kardam, tâbestân-hâ-ye besyâr garmi dârad.

Yazd, a city where I lived for several years, has very hot summers. (formal written; parenthetical apposition)

Do not insert a comma merely because English places one before where. Decide whether the Persian clause identifies the antecedent or comments on an already identified one.

— کدوم کافه رو می‌گی؟ — همون جایی که اولین بار همدیگه رو دیدیم.

— kodum kâfe ro mi-gi? — hamun jâ-yi ke avvalin bâr hamdige ro didim.

— Which café do you mean? — The same place where we first met. (informal, regional: Tehran)

Common Mistakes

1. Copying English preposition stranding

❌ شهری که سال‌ها زندگی کردم در بسیار شلوغ بود.

Incorrect — Persian does not leave در stranded after the relative predicate.

✅ شهری که سال‌ها در آن زندگی کردم بسیار شلوغ بود.

shahri ke sâl-hâ dar ân zendegi kardam besyâr sholugh bud.

The city in which I lived for years was very crowded.

2. Adding interrogative کجا inside a relative

❌ هتلی که کجا ماندیم نزدیک بازار بود.

Incorrect — کجا asks a question; a place relative uses که with a gap or resumptive در آن.

✅ هتلی که در آن ماندیم نزدیک بازار بود.

hoteli ke dar ân mândim nazdik-e bâzâr bud.

The hotel where we stayed was near the bazaar.

3. Doubling the temporal linker

⚠️ روزی وقتی که نتیجه آمد همه خوشحال شدند.

ruzi vaqti ke natije âmad hame khoshhâl shodand.

Recoverable only as two separate temporal frames (‘one day, when ...’), normally with pauses; it is not the single headed ‘the day when’ construction intended here.

✅ روزی که نتیجه اعلام شد همه خوشحال شدند.

ruzi ke natije e'lâm shod hame khoshhâl shodand.

Everyone was happy on the day the result was announced.

4. Separating a restrictive head from که with a comma

❌ اتاقی، که جلسه در آن برگزار شد کوچک بود.

Incorrect restrictive punctuation — the clause identifies the room and stays attached to its head.

✅ اتاقی که جلسه در آن برگزار شد کوچک بود.

otâqi ke jalase dar ân bargozâr shod kuchek bud.

The room where the meeting was held was small.

Key Takeaways

  • Persian uses invariant که after time and place antecedents; it has no separate obligatory words for relative “when” and “where.”
  • زمانی که/وقتی که and جایی که readily encode an understood temporal or locative relation.
  • Lexical antecedents in an oblique در relation normally use resumptive در آن; colloquial speech may use توش.
  • Restrictive clauses stay next to the head without commas; parenthetical information is set off.
  • Track the head’s role inside the relative instead of translating English relative adverbs word for word.

Now practice Farsi

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Farsi

Related Topics

  • Basic Relative Clauses with کهA2Build basic Persian subject and object relative clauses after a noun with که, antecedent ـی, gaps, and invariant linking.
  • Time Clauses with وقتی کهA2Connect simultaneous, sequential, habitual, and future events with وقتی که while choosing tense from the intended timeline.
  • Relative-Clause AttachmentB1Attach Persian که clauses to their antecedents and track gaps, resumptive forms, and را across simple and structurally heavy noun phrases.
  • Preposition Stranding and Resumption in RelativesC1Form Persian prepositional relatives with full pronouns or resumptive clitics, distinguish colloquial afterthought placement, and avoid English-style bare stranding.