When Dutch tells you how to do something — cook a dish, assemble furniture, operate a machine, follow a procedure — it shifts into a distinct, compact register built around the imperative. Recipes, IKEA manuals, washing-machine displays, and online how-tos all share a recognisable style: short command clauses, sequence words threading the steps together, and (in recipes) a clipped shorthand that even drops articles. For an English speaker the imperative itself is the main hurdle, because Dutch has three ways to give an instruction — the bare command, the je-form, and the formal u-form — and each marks a different relationship with the reader. This page covers all three and the connective machinery that holds a set of instructions together.
The bare imperative: the default
The standard instructional form is the bare imperative: the verb stem, no subject, at the front of the clause. This is the form on recipe cards, product steps and signs. It is direct but not rude — in an instructional context it is simply the neutral way to tell someone what to do.
The imperative is just the verb stem (the ik-form): mengen → meng, toevoegen → voeg toe, roeren → roer, bakken → bak. Separable verbs split, exactly as they do in a normal main clause: the prefix goes to the end.
Meng de bloem met de suiker.
Mix the flour with the sugar.
Voeg de eieren een voor een toe.
Add the eggs one at a time. (separable 'toevoegen' → 'voeg … toe')
Druk op de groene knop om te starten.
Press the green button to start. (separable 'drukken op')
The je-form: friendly how-tos
A softer, more personal instructional register uses the second-person present with je — literally "you take…, you stir…". This is the voice of friendly blog recipes, lifestyle how-tos, and explanatory cooking shows. It feels like someone talking you through it rather than barking orders, and it keeps normal main-clause word order (verb second).
Je neemt twee eieren en je klopt ze los.
You take two eggs and you beat them. (je-form — conversational how-to)
Vervolgens laat je het deeg een uur rusten.
Then you let the dough rest for an hour. (sequence marker fronted → inversion: 'laat je')
Notice that when a sequence word like vervolgens or daarna comes first, the verb still has to be second, so the subject je flips to after the verb: Vervolgens *laat je…, not *Vervolgens je laat…. This inversion trips learners up constantly in instructional text, because the steps so often begin with a time word.
The formal u-form: official manuals
Official manuals, safety instructions and corporate documentation often use the polite imperative with u — the verb stem plus u, which reads as respectful and formal: Drukt u op…, Vult u het formulier in…. This is the u-imperative, marked by the -t on the verb and the pronoun u directly after it. It is distinctly formal and slightly old-fashioned-courteous; you meet it in airline announcements, official signage and conservative manuals.
Drukt u op de rode knop in geval van nood.
Press the red button in case of emergency. (formal u-imperative — official sign)
Vult u alstublieft uw gegevens in op het formulier.
Please fill in your details on the form. (formal manual register)
Sequence markers: threading the steps
Instructions live or die by their connective skeleton. Dutch has a standard ladder of sequence adverbs that mark first, next, and last, and most of them trigger inversion when fronted:
| Dutch | English | Position |
|---|---|---|
| eerst | first | opening step |
| vervolgens / daarna | then / after that | middle steps |
| ondertussen / intussen | meanwhile | parallel step |
| ten slotte / tot slot | finally / lastly | closing step |
Eerst verwarm je de oven voor op 180 graden.
First you preheat the oven to 180 degrees. (eerst fronted → 'verwarm je')
Ondertussen snijd je de groenten in kleine stukjes.
Meanwhile you chop the vegetables into small pieces.
Ten slotte bestrooi je het geheel met kaas en bak je het af.
Finally you sprinkle it all with cheese and finish baking it.
Note the spelling: as a sequence marker ("finally, lastly"), ten slotte is two words. The one-word tenslotte exists too but means "after all / when all is said and done" — a reasoning word, not a step. And don't reach for uiteindelijk ("in the end / eventually") here: it marks an outcome, not the last step in a procedure.
'laten' for resting and letting steps
A signature of recipe and process Dutch is laten ("to let/allow") for steps where you leave something to happen on its own — resting dough, simmering a sauce, cooling a cake. The pattern is laat + object + time + infinitive (with no te).
Laat het deeg dertig minuten rusten op een warme plek.
Let the dough rest for thirty minutes in a warm spot.
Laat de saus tien minuten zachtjes pruttelen.
Let the sauce simmer gently for ten minutes.
Laat de cake helemaal afkoelen voordat je hem aansnijdt.
Let the cake cool completely before you cut it.
'zorg dat' and dropped articles
Two more recipe-and-manual habits round out the register. Zorg dat / zorg ervoor dat ("make sure that") states a condition you must guarantee:
Zorg dat de pan goed heet is voordat je het vlees erin legt.
Make sure the pan is properly hot before you put the meat in.
Zorg ervoor dat alle onderdelen droog zijn.
Make sure all the parts are dry. (manual register)
And recipe shorthand — especially in ingredient lists and terse instructions — drops articles and even verbs the way English recipes do ("add salt to taste"): Bloem zeven, boter smelten, eieren toevoegen. The infinitive can stand in for the imperative in this clipped list style.
Boter smelten, bloem erdoor roeren, melk toevoegen.
Melt butter, stir in flour, add milk. (clipped recipe shorthand — infinitives, dropped articles)
Common Mistakes
❌ Toevoeg de eieren en aanzet de mixer.
Wrong — separable verbs must split in the imperative: 'Voeg … toe', 'Zet … aan'. The stem leads, the prefix goes to the end.
✅ Voeg de eieren toe en zet de mixer aan.
Add the eggs and switch on the mixer.
❌ Vervolgens je voegt de suiker toe.
Wrong word order — after a fronted sequence word the verb must be second, so the subject flips: 'Vervolgens voeg je …'.
✅ Vervolgens voeg je de suiker toe.
Then you add the sugar.
❌ Meng de bloem. Je neemt dan de eieren. Voegt u de melk toe.
Wrong — three different instructional registers (bare imperative, je-form, formal u) mixed in one recipe; pick one and keep it.
✅ Meng de bloem. Neem dan de eieren. Voeg de melk toe.
Mix the flour. Then take the eggs. Add the milk. (consistent bare imperative)
❌ Laat het deeg dertig minuten te rusten.
Wrong — 'laten' takes a bare infinitive, no 'te': 'laat … rusten', not 'laat … te rusten'.
✅ Laat het deeg dertig minuten rusten.
Let the dough rest for thirty minutes.
❌ Zorg dat de oven is heet.
Wrong — 'zorg dat' introduces a subordinate clause, so the verb goes to the end: 'Zorg dat de oven heet is'.
✅ Zorg dat de oven heet is.
Make sure the oven is hot.
Key Takeaways
- Instructional Dutch defaults to the bare imperative (verb stem first): Meng, Voeg toe, Druk op — and separable verbs split (Voeg … toe, Zet … aan).
- Two alternatives carry different formality: the friendly je-form (Je neemt…, blog how-tos) and the formal u-form (Drukt u op…, official manuals). Keep one register through a whole set of steps.
- Sequence markers (eerst, vervolgens, ondertussen, ten slotte) thread the steps and trigger inversion when fronted (Vervolgens voeg je…).
- laten
- bare infinitive handles resting/letting steps (laat … rusten); zorg dat
- clause states conditions (verb to the end); recipe shorthand drops articles and uses infinitives in clipped lists.
- bare infinitive handles resting/letting steps (laat … rusten); zorg dat
Now practice Dutch
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Dutch→Related Topics
- Register and Style: OverviewB1 — An orientation to register in Dutch — why formality is a coordinated bundle (pronoun u/jij, vocabulary, sentence complexity, nominal vs verbal style, particles) that you switch all at once, and how spoken and written channels each call for their own register.
- Spoken vs Written DutchB1 — The wide gap between Dutch as it is spoken and Dutch as it is written. Speech runs on reduced forms ('t, 'm, 'r, ie, 'k), ellipsis, modal particles and dislocation; writing runs on full forms, explicit connectives, nominal style and complex subordination. How to recognise each register and why writing as you speak — or speaking as you write — both go wrong.
- Giving and Following InstructionsA2 — How Dutch tells you what to do: the imperative for steps ('Druk op de knop', 'Voeg toe'), the 'je moet'/'u'-instruction softeners, the sequence markers 'eerst … vervolgens … ten slotte', and 'zorg dat / zorg ervoor dat' — with the word-order and separable-verb traps recipes and manuals always spring.
- U vs Jij: The Register ChoiceA2 — The most consequential pronoun choice in Dutch — 'u' (formal, distant, respectful) vs 'jij/je' (familiar, equal, warm). How each one changes the verb, how 'jullie' fits in, why the choice signals the whole relationship, and the modern tutoyeren drift toward 'je'. When in doubt with an adult stranger, start with 'u'.