Impersonal, Generic, and Agentless Sentences | Arabic (Levantine) Grammar

Lebanese often describes a rule, procedure, report, or event without naming a specific agent. It can use generic “you,” an understood third-person plural “they,” a passive-like derived verb, or an existential frame such as في شغل لازم ينعمل “there is work that has to be done.” These are several grammatical strategies, not one impersonal conjugation.

English encourages dummy subjects such as it and there and a highly productive passive with be. Urban Lebanese instead asks what should remain central: the typical participant, the institution, the affected thing, or simply the obligation.

Four ways to background an agent

Strategy	Example	What it foregrounds
generic second person	بتفوت من هون	the steps anyone follows
understood third plural	بيطلبوا الهوية	what staff/people customarily do
passive-like derived form	انفتح الباب	the affected thing or resulting event
existential obligation	في طلب لازم ينبعت	the task that exists

No strategy is an exact translation of English impersonal it. Choosing among them changes the discourse focus.

Generic second person: what anyone does

A second-person b-imperfect can describe a repeatable procedure or ordinary experience. Morphologically, the common singular frame has the same shape as masculine singular address, but context gives it a general reading.

بتفوت من هون وبتدفع عند الباب.

btifūt min hōn w-btidfaʿ ʿind el-bēb.

You go in here and pay at the door. (generic procedural ‘you’)

بهالشغل، بتحكي مع ناس كتير طول النهار.

bi-hash-shoghol, btiḥke maʿ nēs ktīr ṭūl en-nhār.

In this job, you talk to lots of people all day. (generic experience)

لما بيجي دورك، بتعطيهم الورقة الزرقا.

lamma byizhe dōrak, btiʿṭīyon el-waraʾa z-zarʾa.

When your turn comes, you give them the blue paper. (repeatable instruction; masculine-singular form with generic force)

This resembles English generic you, but person marking remains real Lebanese grammar. In direct address, context may instead identify one man. Use الواحد “a person” when an explicitly general interpretation matters; the wider system appears on the generic statements page.

💡

Generic does not mean uninflected. The verb still has a second-person form; the surrounding procedure or generalization broadens who that person can be.

Understood third-person plural: institutional “they”

A plural verb with no overt subject can mean “they / people / the staff” when the exact agents are irrelevant or easily inferred. The form retains full plural agreement.

عالباب بيطلبوا الهوية.

ʿal-bēb byiṭlobo l-huwiyye.

At the door they ask for ID. (staff understood; institutional procedure)

بيقولوا الطريق رح تفتح قبل الضهر.

byiʾūlo ṭ-ṭarīʾ raḥ tiftaḥ ʾabel eḍ-ḍoher.

They say the road will reopen before noon. (source-general hearsay)

بهالمحل ما بيقبلوا إلا كاش.

b-hal-maḥall ma byiʾbalo illa kēsh.

At this shop they only accept cash. (negative institutional practice)

Adding هني changes the packaging. It normally points to a salient group—“those people”—rather than preserving a deliberately nonspecific agent.

Build from a short procedure to an expanded one

Begin with the institutional action, then add the scene, affected person, and timing.

بيطلبوا هوية.

byiṭlobo huwiyye.

They ask for ID. (short agent-backgrounding clause)

عالباب بيطلبوا هوية.

ʿal-bēb byiṭlobo huwiyye.

At the door they ask for ID. (location framed first)

عالباب بيطلبوا هوية من كل زبون قبل ما يفوت.

ʿal-bēb byiṭlobo huwiyye min kill zabūn ʾabel ma yfūt.

At the door they ask every customer for ID before he goes in. (expanded institutional rule)

The fronted location is a frame, not a subject. The plural suffix on بيطلبوا is the only agent marking needed.

Passive-like and change-of-state verbs

Derived forms such as انفتح “opened / was opened,” انكتب “got written,” and تأجل “was postponed” foreground the affected entity or event. They do not require an expressed agent.

انفتح الباب عالتمانية.

infataḥ el-bēb ʿat-tmēnye.

The door opened / was opened at eight. (agent not profiled)

انكتب الاسم غلط عالطلب.

inkatab el-isim ghalaṭ ʿaṭ-ṭalab.

The name was written incorrectly on the application. (affected item foregrounded)

تأجل الاجتماع للأسبوع الجايي.

tʾazhzhal el-izhtimēʿ lal-osbūʿ el-zhēye.

The meeting was postponed until next week. (decision-maker backgrounded)

These forms are lexical. انكسر الكاس can mean “the glass broke” without implying that someone broke it, while انكتب الاسم strongly invites an agentive writing event. Do not assume that one derived pattern is a mechanical passive for every active verb. See passive strategies for the stem-by-stem system.

💡

A passive-like verb tells you that the agent is not syntactically central; it does not always tell you whether the event was spontaneous. The lexical meaning of the verb still matters.

Unspecified plural versus passive-like event

The two strategies can describe the same situation from different angles.

سكروا الطريق بسبب الأشغال.

sakkaro ṭ-ṭarīʾ b-sabab el-ashghāl.

They closed the road because of the works. (unspecified human agents foregrounded as actors)

الطريق تسكرت بسبب الأشغال.

eṭ-ṭarīʾ tsakkarit b-sabab el-ashghāl.

The road was closed because of the works. (affected road foregrounded)

The first is useful when “what did they do?” is relevant. The second answers “what happened to the road?” Neither requires naming the authority or workers.

Existential obligations and impersonal necessity

Existential في can introduce a task, problem, or amount of work. لازم then predicates necessity of an action affecting it.

في طلب لازم ينبعت اليوم.

fī ṭalab lāzem yinbaʿat el-yōm.

There's an application that has to be sent today. (existing task plus passive-like action)

في شغلتين لازم يخلصوا قبل الجمعة.

fī shaghaltēn lāzem yikhlaṣo ʾabel el-zhomʿa.

There are two things that have to be finished before Friday. (plural task agreement)

ما في داعي تنطر برا.

ma fī dēʿe tinṭor barra.

There's no need for you to wait outside. (impersonal absence of necessity, addressed to one man)

Lebanese needs no dummy it in لازم نخلص “we need to finish” and no dummy there before existential في. The construction itself supplies the frame.

Impersonal rules as nominal sentences

A participle or adjective can state a rule without a present copula: ممنوع “forbidden,” مسموح “allowed,” ضروري “necessary.”

ممنوع التدخين هون.

mamnūʿ et-tadkhīn hōn.

Smoking is prohibited here. (agentless rule; no present copula)

مسموح التصوير بلا فلاش.

masmūḥ et-taṣwīr bla flēsh.

Photography is allowed without flash. (agentless permission)

On signs and official notices, formal passive vocabulary and syntax are common (formal). In conversation, the Lebanese nominal rule or plural institutional strategy is normally lighter.

Affirmative and negative institutional practice

Negation goes before the b-imperfect and keeps its plural agreement.

هون بيقبلوا بطاقات.

hōn byiʾbalo biṭāʾāt.

Here they accept cards. (affirmative institutional practice)

هون ما بيقبلوا بطاقات.

hōn ma byiʾbalo biṭāʾāt.

Here they don't accept cards. (negative institutional practice)

There is no English-style do support, and negation does not remove plural -وا.

Dialogue: at a service center

وين بقدم هالطلب؟

wēn bʾaddem haṭ-ṭalab?

Maya: Where do I submit this application?

بتاخد رقم من هون، وبعدين بينادوا اسمك.

btēkhod raʾam min hōn, w-baʿdēn byinēdo ismak.

Nadim: You take a number here, and then they call your name. (generic second person followed by institutional plural)

ولازم يكون الطلب معبى قبل؟

w-lāzem ykūn eṭ-ṭalab mʿabba ʾabel?

Maya: And does the application have to be filled out beforehand? (result-state obligation)

إيه، وإذا ناقص توقيع ما بيقبلوه.

ē, w-iza nāʾeṣ tawʾīʿ ma byiʾbalū.

Nadim: Yes, and if a signature is missing, they won't accept it. (agentless state plus unspecified staff)

Common Mistakes

Forcing an overt “they” into a generic procedure

❌ هني بيطلبوا الهوية عالباب.

Wrong for the intended nonspecific policy — هني points to an already identifiable group rather than backgrounding the staff.

✅ بيطلبوا الهوية عالباب.

byiṭlobo l-huwiyye ʿal-bēb.

They ask for ID at the door. (institutional ‘they’)

Adding a dummy subject before necessity

❌ هو لازم توقع هون.

Incorrect for impersonal ‘you have to sign here’ — هو means ‘he’ and creates a real masculine subject.

✅ لازم توقع هون.

lāzem twaʾʾeʿ hōn.

You have to sign here. (addressed to one man)

Treating every انـ verb as a mechanical passive

❌ انكسر الكاس يعني أكيد حدا كسره.

Incorrect inference — انكسر can describe the glass breaking without asserting a human agent.

✅ انكسر الكاس وما منعرف كيف.

inkasar el-kēs w-ma mnaʿref kīf.

The glass broke, and we don't know how.

Inserting a present copula into a nominal rule

❌ بيكون ممنوع التصوير هون.

Wrong for the intended plain current rule — بيكون adds a habitual or contextual frame.

✅ ممنوع التصوير هون.

mamnūʿ et-taṣwīr hōn.

Photography is prohibited here.

Mixing formal notice syntax into conversation

❌ هون يطلب إبراز الهوية عند الدخول.

Wrong for the requested conversational Beirut register — this imports formal notice vocabulary and syntax.

✅ هون بيطلبوا الهوية عالباب.

hōn byiṭlobo l-huwiyye ʿal-bēb.

Here they ask for ID at the door. (informal Lebanese)

Key Takeaways

Use generic second person for repeatable experience, an understood plural verb for institutional “they,” a lexical passive-like stem to foreground an affected entity, and في + task + لازم to present an obligation. These strategies retain normal Lebanese agreement while leaving a specific agent unnamed. Do not insert English dummy it/there, force an independent pronoun, or assume that every انـ verb proves the presence of a human agent.

Now practice Arabic

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Arabic →