Breakdown of Yfirmanninum ber að rannsaka meiðslin.
Questions & Answers about Yfirmanninum ber að rannsaka meiðslin.
What does Yfirmanninum mean, and why does it end in -num?
Yfirmanninum is the dative singular definite form of yfirmaður, which means superior, manager, boss, officer in charge depending on context.
A few useful forms are:
- yfirmaður = a superior / manager
- yfirmaðurinn = the superior / the manager
- yfirmanninum = to/for the superior, or the superior in a dative construction
The ending -num is the definite dative singular ending here.
Why is yfirmanninum in the dative instead of the nominative?
Because the expression bera einhverjum að + infinitive uses a dative noun phrase for the person who has the duty or obligation.
So in this sentence, Icelandic does not structure it like plain English the manager investigates... Instead, it is more like:
- it falls to the manager to investigate...
- the manager is obliged to investigate...
- it is incumbent on the manager to investigate...
That is why you get yfirmanninum rather than nominative yfirmaðurinn.
What does ber mean here?
Here ber is the 3rd person singular present tense of bera in a special idiomatic use.
In this construction, bera einhverjum að gera eitthvað means:
- someone is obliged to do something
- someone has the duty to do something
- it is incumbent on someone to do something
So Yfirmanninum ber að rannsaka meiðslin means roughly:
- The superior has a duty to investigate the injuries.
Is this the same verb as bera meaning to carry?
Yes, it is the same verb historically and grammatically, but in this sentence it is part of a fixed idiomatic expression.
So although bera often means carry, bear, the phrase bera einhverjum að + infinitive should be learned as a unit with a special meaning: to be someone’s duty / obligation.
In other words, you should not try to translate ber literally as carries here.
What is the function of að rannsaka?
Að rannsaka is the infinitive of the verb rannsaka, meaning to investigate.
After ber, Icelandic uses að + infinitive:
- ber að rannsaka = is obliged to investigate
This is very similar to English to investigate after expressions like has to or is supposed to, except that Icelandic uses the particle að before the infinitive.
Why is it rannsaka, not some other form like rannsakar?
Because after að in this construction, Icelandic uses the infinitive, not a finite verb form.
So:
- rannsaka = to investigate — correct here
- rannsakar = investigates — a present tense finite verb, not correct here
The sentence has only one finite verb: ber.
What does meiðslin mean, and what form is it?
Meiðslin is the definite plural of meiðsli, meaning the injuries.
This noun is typically used in the plural in Icelandic. Its important forms are:
- meiðsli = injuries
- meiðslin = the injuries
- meiðslum = to/with injuries
- meiðslunum = the injuries, in the dative
In this sentence, meiðslin is the direct object of rannsaka.
Why is it meiðslin and not meiðslunum?
Because rannsaka normally takes the accusative object, and for this noun the definite accusative plural is meiðslin.
So:
- rannsaka meiðslin = investigate the injuries
- meiðslunum would be dative, which does not fit here
This is a good example of how Icelandic case is often determined by the verb.
Is meiðsli always plural?
Usually, yes. Meiðsli is commonly treated as a plural noun in Icelandic, much like some English nouns that are often plural in form.
So even where English might sometimes say the injury, Icelandic may still use the plural noun meiðsli / meiðslin, depending on context.
For learners, the safest approach is to remember meiðsli as a noun normally used in the plural.
Why is the word order Yfirmanninum ber að rannsaka meiðslin?
Icelandic main clauses usually follow the V2 rule, meaning the finite verb tends to come in the second position.
Here:
- first element: Yfirmanninum
- second element: ber
So the order is perfectly normal.
This sentence begins with the person who has the duty, which is natural and emphasizes who the obligation falls on. A different order may be possible in other contexts, but this one is very standard.
Does this sentence have a subject?
Not a normal nominative subject in the way English does.
Many grammars describe this kind of sentence as impersonal, or they say the dative noun phrase behaves like a quirky subject. In practical terms, the important thing for a learner is:
- the person responsible is in the dative
- the verb stays in 3rd person singular
- the obligation is expressed by ber að + infinitive
So even though yfirmanninum is not nominative, it is still the key participant in the sentence.
How strong is ber að? Is it like should, must, or is supposed to?
It usually sounds more formal and duty-based than ordinary should.
Depending on context, it can mean:
- is obliged to
- has the duty to
- must
- it is incumbent on ... to
It is especially common in formal, administrative, or legal-style language. So this sentence sounds stronger and more official than a casual suggestion.
How is this different from Yfirmaðurinn á að rannsaka meiðslin?
Both can mean something like The manager is supposed to investigate the injuries, but the tone is different.
Yfirmanninum ber að rannsaka meiðslin
More formal, duty-based, official, even legal in tone.Yfirmaðurinn á að rannsaka meiðslin
More everyday and general: the manager is supposed to investigate the injuries.
So ber að is often the more formal and institutional way to express obligation.
How would I negate this sentence?
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning IcelandicMaster Icelandic — from Yfirmanninum ber að rannsaka meiðslin to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions