Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Chinese: zhè shì shēnsè yīfu. - These are dark-colored clothes.

Hardcore Chinese
/Doing the household laundry
/zhè shì shēnsè yīfu.

zhè shì shēnsè yīfu.

这zhè　是shì　深色shēnsè　衣服yīfu。zhè shì shēnsè yīfu.

These are dark-colored clothes.

Breakdown of zhè shì shēnsè yīfu.

衣服yīfuyīfu

深色shēnsèshēnsè

Questions & Answers about zhè shì shēnsè yīfu.

Why is 这 used by itself here instead of 这个?

Because 这 is acting as a pronoun, meaning this.

The structure is:

这 = this
是 = is
深色衣服 = dark-colored clothing / dark-colored clothes

So the sentence is literally This is dark-colored clothing.

You use 这个 when 这 directly modifies a noun and needs a measure word:

这个人 = this person
这件衣服 = this piece of clothing

But in 这是深色衣服, 这 stands alone, so no measure word is needed.

Why is there no measure word after 这?

For the same reason: 这 is not directly attached to a noun here.

Compare these two patterns:

这是衣服。 = This is clothing.
这件衣服。 = this item of clothing

In the second pattern, 这 modifies 衣服, so you need a measure word such as 件. In the sentence you gave, 这 is the whole subject by itself, so no measure word appears.

What does 是 do here? Is it exactly the same as English to be?

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Chinese grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Chinese now

是 is often like English to be, but not in every situation.

Here, 是 links 这 with a noun phrase:

这 → subject
是 → links subject and noun phrase
深色衣服 → noun phrase

So 是 works naturally here.

However, Chinese does not use 是 before adjectives the same way English does. For example, English says This shirt is dark, but Chinese more naturally says:

这件衣服是深色的。
or sometimes 这件衣服很深色 is less standard and not the usual beginner pattern

So 是 is fine before a noun phrase like 深色衣服, but with plain adjectives Chinese often uses different patterns.

Why is there no 的 between 深色 and 衣服?

Because 深色 can directly modify 衣服 as a compound-style modifier.

So:

深色衣服 = dark-colored clothing / dark clothes

This is normal Chinese.

You can also say:

深色的衣服

That version is also correct and may sound a little more explicitly descriptive. In many cases, both are possible:

深色衣服
深色的衣服

The version without 的 is compact and very common, especially in everyday labels, descriptions, and categories.

What exactly does 深色 mean?

深色 means dark in color or dark-colored.

It does not mean only black. It refers more generally to colors that are deep or dark, such as:

dark blue
dark gray
dark brown
black-like dark shades

Its common opposite is:

浅色 = light-colored

So 深色衣服 means clothes in darker colors, not necessarily black clothes.

What is the difference between 深色 and 黑色?

They are related, but not the same.

深色 = dark-colored, a broad category
黑色 = black, one specific color

So:

深色衣服 = dark-colored clothes
黑色衣服 = black clothes

If something is black, it is usually also 深色, but not all 深色 clothes are black.

Does 衣服 mean one item of clothing or clothes in general?

Usually 衣服 is a general word for clothes or clothing.

Chinese nouns usually do not change form for singular and plural the way English nouns do. So 衣服 can refer to clothing in a general sense, and context tells you more.

If you want to clearly refer to one item, Chinese often uses a measure word:

一件衣服 = one piece/item of clothing
这件衣服 = this item of clothing

So in your sentence, 衣服 sounds more general than a single clearly counted item.

Is this sentence natural in everyday Chinese?

Yes, but it depends on the situation.

这是深色衣服 is natural when you are identifying a category, type, or group, for example:

这是深色衣服，那是浅色衣服。
- This is dark-colored clothing; that is light-colored clothing.

But if you are talking about one specific garment, Chinese speakers often prefer:

这件衣服是深色的。

That sounds more like This piece of clothing is dark-colored.

So the sentence you gave is understandable and correct, but for a single item, 这件衣服是深色的 is often more natural.

Why isn’t the sentence 这件衣服是深色的 instead?

That is actually a very common alternative, and in many real-life situations it may sound more natural.

The difference is mainly structural:

这是深色衣服。
- This is dark-colored clothing.
- More like identifying what something is.
这件衣服是深色的。
- This item of clothing is dark-colored.
- More like describing the color property of a specific item.

So both are useful, but they focus on the idea a little differently.

How is 衣服 pronounced? Why is fu written without a tone mark?

In standard Mandarin, 衣服 is commonly pronounced yīfu, with the second syllable in a neutral tone.

So you will often hear:

yīfu

rather than a full second tone on 服.

This is very common in everyday Mandarin: many two-syllable words have a neutral second syllable in actual speech.

Do Chinese sentences like this need words like a or the?

No. Chinese does not use articles like English a, an, and the.

So 这是深色衣服 does not need any separate word for a or the. The exact English translation depends on context:

This is dark-colored clothing.
This is a dark-colored garment.
These are dark clothes. — if the situation makes that meaning clear

English forces you to choose articles and number more often; Chinese often leaves that to context.

How would I make this sentence into a question?

The easiest way is to add 吗:

这是深色衣服吗？
- Is this dark-colored clothing?

You can also use an A-not-A question, though that is less directly tied to this exact noun phrase pattern. For beginners, 吗 is the simplest and most common choice.

How would I make it negative?

You can negate 是 with 不:

这不是深色衣服。
- This is not dark-colored clothing.

If you are talking about one specific item and describing its color, a more natural negative might be:

这件衣服不是深色的。
- This item of clothing is not dark-colored.

So the negative pattern depends a little on whether you are identifying something or describing it.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io