المالك سمح بالنقلة.

A common Levantine-style pronunciation would be:

el-mālek samaḥ bin-naʔle

A few notes:

• المالك → el-mālek
• سمح → samaḥ
• بالنقلة → bin-naʔle

Also:

• In many urban Levantine dialects, ق is pronounced like a glottal stop ʔ, so نقلة sounds like naʔle.
• In some dialects, speakers keep q and say naqle instead.

المالك literally means the owner.

Depending on context, it can also mean:

• the landlord in a housing context
• the proprietor in a business context

So if this sentence is about an apartment or house, المالك may very naturally mean the landlord.

سمح is the past tense, 3rd person singular masculine form of the verb to allow / permit.

So here it means:

• he allowed
• he permitted

Because the subject is المالك, the full sense is the owner allowed / permitted.

If the owner were female, you would say:

• المالكة سمحت بالنقلة

Because the verb سمح commonly takes the preposition بـ when you mean to permit / allow something.

So:

• سمح بالنقلة = he allowed the move / transfer

Saying سمح النقلة would sound wrong or at least unnatural in this pattern.

You may also see related patterns like:

• سمح له = he allowed him
• سمح له بالنقلة = he allowed him to make the move / transfer

Because بالنقلة is made of:

• بـ = with / in / by here functioning with the verb
• ال = the
• نقلة = move / transfer

So literally it is ب + ال + نقلة.

The letter ن is a sun letter, so the ل of ال assimilates to it in pronunciation. That is why:

• بالنقلة is pronounced bin-naʔle

In writing, the spelling stays the same, but in speech the sound changes.

النقلة comes from the idea of moving or transferring.

Depending on context, it can mean:

• the move
• the transfer
• the relocation
• sometimes the switch/change

So the exact English translation depends on the situation. If the meaning was already given to you, that context tells you which of these is intended.

The ة is the taa marbuuTa, which usually marks a noun as grammatically feminine.

So نقلة is a feminine noun.

In Levantine pronunciation, when you pause on the word, it is usually pronounced like:

• naʔle

But when the word is connected in certain grammatical constructions, that ending may sound more like -t.

So learners often hear:

• naʔle in isolation
• but something closer to naʔlit... when another word follows in a tight phrase

Because Levantine Arabic very often uses subject-first word order in everyday speech.

So:

• المالك سمح بالنقلة = The owner allowed the move

This is very natural in spoken Levantine.

A more formal or more Standard-Arabic-like version could start with the verb:

• سمح المالك بالنقلة

Both are understandable, but subject + verb is especially common in spoken Levantine.

It is understandable in Levantine, but it does sound a bit formal or written-like.

Why?

• المالك is fine and common enough, but a speaker might also say صاحب البيت if they specifically mean the landlord / owner of the house
• سمح بالنقلة sounds somewhat administrative or formal

In more casual speech, people might say things like:

• المالك وافق عالنقلة
• صاحب البيت وافق عالنقلة

Those mean something like the owner/landlord agreed to the move.

So your sentence is good, but it leans a little more formal than very casual street speech.

Not in normal Levantine pronunciation.

In Standard Arabic, the fully inflected version would have case endings, but in Levantine those endings are dropped in speech.

So a Levantine speaker would say:

• el-mālek samaḥ bin-naʔle

not a fully case-ended Standard Arabic pronunciation.

This is one reason written Arabic may look more formal than how people actually say it.

A few natural alternatives are:

• المالك وافق عالنقلة
• صاحب البيت وافق عالنقلة
• المالك سمحلنا بالنقلة if you want to say the owner allowed us to move
• المالك سمح إلنا ننقل in a more conversational style

These are not all identical in nuance, but they are common ways to express a similar idea in spoken Levantine.