البيطري انقذ القطة.

A common Levantine-style pronunciation would be roughly el-bayṭari anʔaz il-ʔiṭṭa.

A few notes:

• الـ often sounds like el- or il- in Levantine, not classical al-
• ق is often pronounced ʔ in many urban Levantine accents
• ذ in أنقذ is often pronounced more like z in everyday Levantine speech

A more formal / standard reading would be al-bayṭari anqaḏ al-qiṭṭa.

That is a normal Levantine feature. The definite article الـ is usually pronounced with a shorter front vowel, so it often sounds like el- or il-.

In this sentence:

• البيطري → el-bayṭari
• القطة → il-ʔiṭṭa in many Levantine accents

So the spelling stays the same, but the spoken form shifts.

Because ب and ق are moon letters, so the l sound is pronounced.

That means:

• البيطري keeps the l
• القطة also keeps the l

If the next letter were a sun letter, the l would assimilate. For example, الشمس is pronounced ash-shams, not al-shams.

In careful standard spelling, yes: it is usually written أنقذ.

But in everyday typing, texting, and informal writing, many people leave hamzas off, so انقذ is very common. A learner should recognize both as the same word.

Here, -ي is part of the word بيطري, not a separate suffix meaning my.

بيطري is the word for veterinary / veterinarian. In this sentence, البيطري functions as a noun meaning the veterinarian / the vet.

So:

• بيطري = veterinary / veterinarian
• البيطري = the veterinarian

Because both nouns are definite:

• البيطري = the vet
• القطة = the cat

Arabic marks definiteness directly on the noun with الـ. If you removed it, the meaning would become indefinite:

• بيطري = a vet
• قطة = a cat

Grammatically, قطة is feminine in form. Literally, it can refer to a female cat.

But in real usage, words like this are often used more generally when the sex of the animal is not important. So depending on context, it may simply be understood as cat.

If you want the masculine form in standard Arabic, that would be قط.

Both patterns are possible.

This sentence is:

• البيطري انقذ القطة = subject + verb + object

That order is very natural in Levantine. You could also say:

• أنقذ البيطري القطة

That is more verb-first, which is also common in Arabic, especially in more formal styles. In everyday Levantine, subject-first is very common.

It is understandable in Levantine, but it leans a bit formal.

Why?

• The structure is fine for Levantine
• But أنقذ sounds somewhat formal compared with more casual everyday speech
• القطة is understood, but many speakers might use another everyday word such as البسّة, depending on region

So this sentence works, but it is not the most colloquial possible version.

That final letter is taa marbuuṭa: ة.

In words like قطة, it usually sounds like:

• -a when you stop at the word

So you say something like qiṭṭa or ʔiṭṭa.

This ending is very common in feminine nouns. If you add certain endings after it, the t sound can come back.

Yes. The word is basically qiṭṭa, with a doubled ṭ.

So it is not a light single t sound. You should hold that consonant a little longer:

• qi-ṭṭa
• in many Levantine accents: ʔi-ṭṭa

That doubled consonant is an important part of the word.

You would normally change both the profession word and the verb:

• البيطرية أنقذت القطة

So:

• البيطري → البيطرية
• أنقذ → أنقذت

Arabic marks gender much more clearly than English does in sentences like this.

Not in Levantine.

In everyday Levantine speech, you do not pronounce the full case endings used in careful Modern Standard Arabic. So you simply say the words without final endings like -u or -a.

That is why a Levantine reading of the sentence is much simpler than a fully classical one.