المرشح هيقبل عقد العمل.

It has two parts:

• هـ = the Egyptian future marker, like will
• يقبل = he accepts

So هيقبل means he will accept.

A common source of confusion is that the word starts with هيـ, but here that is not the separate word هي meaning she. It is just هـ attached to a verb that already begins with ي.

No.

In this sentence, هيقبل is one verb form, not هي plus another word.

You can tell because:

• يقبل is the he form
• if the subject were she, the verb would be تقبل
• with the future marker, that would become هتقبل

So:

• هيقبل = he will accept
• هتقبل = she will accept

Because Egyptian Arabic uses different markers for present and future.

• بيقبل = present or habitual, depending on context
• هيقبل = future

So the contrast is roughly:

• المرشح بيقبل عقد العمل = the candidate accepts / is accepting the employment contract
• المرشح هيقبل عقد العمل = the candidate will accept the employment contract

In Egyptian, بـ and the future marker هـ normally do not go together here.

A good approximation is:

el-morashshaḥ hayeʔbal ʿaʔd el-ʿamal

A few useful notes:

• ق is often pronounced as a glottal stop ʔ in Egyptian
• ع does not have a direct English equivalent
• الـ in المرشح is pronounced fully because م is not a sun letter

You may also hear slight vowel variation in هيقبل, such as hayiʔbal or hayeʔbal.

Because the subject المرشح is masculine singular.

Egyptian verbs agree with the subject in person and gender. Here the subject is the male candidate, so the verb uses the masculine singular form.

If the subject were feminine, you would say:

المرشحة هتقبل عقد العمل

So the change would be:

• masculine: هيقبل
• feminine: هتقبل

Because it is definite: the candidate.

So:

• مرشح = a candidate
• المرشح = the candidate

English often uses the where Arabic uses الـ, so this is very normal.

Because this is an iḍāfa construction, often called a construct phrase.

In عقد العمل:

• عقد = contract
• العمل = the work

Together, the phrase means the work contract or the employment contract.

In an iḍāfa:

• the first noun usually does not take الـ
• the second noun determines whether the whole phrase is definite

So:

• عقد عمل = a work contract
• عقد العمل = the work contract / the employment contract

العقد العمل would not be the normal structure here.

Yes. This sentence uses:

• subject + verb + object

That is very common in Egyptian Arabic, especially in straightforward spoken statements.

So:

• المرشح = subject
• هيقبل = verb
• عقد العمل = object

This sounds natural and neutral.

It is Egyptian, but somewhat formal in vocabulary.

Why:

• هيقبل is clearly Egyptian colloquial
• المرشح and عقد العمل are words that also fit formal or business-style Arabic

So the sentence is natural, especially in a professional context, but it is not super casual everyday street speech.

In more casual Egyptian, someone might say عقد الشغل instead of عقد العمل.

You would normally say:

المرشح مش هيقبل عقد العمل

Here مش negates the future verb phrase.

So:

• هيقبل = will accept
• مش هيقبل = will not accept

That is the most natural everyday Egyptian way to negate this sentence.

In MSA, you would typically say:

المرشح سيقبل عقد العمل
or
المرشح سوف يقبل عقد العمل

The main difference is the future marker:

• Egyptian: هـ as in هيقبل
• MSA: سـ or سوف

So this sentence is a good example of how Egyptian and MSA often share vocabulary, while the verb marking shows you which variety you are looking at.