Questions & Answers about Seppä jäi pajaan takomaan rautaa.
Why are we using pajaan (into the workshop) and takomaan when the English translation says 'in the workshop' and 'to forge'?
The verb jäädä (to stay/remain) has a strict rule (rection) about the words that follow it. It requires the location to be in the illative case (pajaan) and any subsequent action verb to be in the third infinitive illative form (takomaan). Conceptually, Finnish treats this as staying 'into' a place 'into doing' an action.
Is it possible to use the basic dictionary form takoa instead of takomaan here?
No, using takoa would be incorrect. Although the first infinitive often translates to 'to do' in English, verbs of staying (jäädä), leaving (jättää), and forgetting (unohtaa) always force the following verb into the -maan or -mään form.
It is easy to confuse jäädä and jättää. Do they both work this way?
Yes, they share the exact same grammatical rules despite having different meanings. jäädä (to stay/remain) is intransitive, like the blacksmith staying here. jättää (to leave something) is transitive, like leaving your tools behind. Both require an illative location and a -maan verb.
Why is the object rautaa in the partitive case rather than the accusative?