Learn Finnish: Pelattaisiinkohan täällä vuoropohjaista peliä? - I wonder if a turn-based game would be played here?

It follows the strict order of Stem + Passive + Mood + Person + Clitics. The stem is pelat- (from the verb pelata). To this, we add the passive marker -ta-, the conditional mood marker -isi-, and the passive personal ending -in, creating pelattaisiin (would be played). Finally, we attach the question clitic -ko and the softening clitic -han, giving us the complete word.

Why is the clitic order -kohan and not -hanko at the end of the verb?

Enclitic particles have their own strict internal hierarchy. The question clitic -ko or -kö always precedes softening or emphasizing clitics like -han / -hän or -pa / -pä. Therefore, you will always see -kohan (used to mean 'I wonder if...') and never -hanko.

Why is the object vuoropohjaista peliä in the partitive case here instead of the nominative?

Normally, a passive sentence puts a totally affected object into the nominative case (the endingless accusative). However, the verb pelata (to play a game or sport) is a partitive verb, meaning it strongly governs and always requires a partitive object. This inherent verb rule overrides the standard passive object case rules.

How is the adjective vuoropohjaista constructed?