Tuy...Nhưng Concession | Vietnamese Grammar

Tuy P nhưng Q presents P as an acknowledged fact and then gives Q, a fact or conclusion that runs against the expectation raised by P. Tuy căn hộ nhỏ nhưng rất sáng means “Although the apartment is small, it is very bright.” The speaker accepts both descriptions; the construction organizes them as a balanced concession.

Vietnamese can signal a logical relation on both sides of a sentence. Tuy opens the conceded side and nhưng marks the counterweight. In concise writing, one member of the connective pair may be absent when vẫn, cũng, or context keeps the relation clear; in careful exposition, the full pair prevents ambiguity. This page focuses on tuy...nhưng. Stronger mặc dù and formal sentence connectors such as tuy nhiên and song are covered separately on Mặc Dù and Formal Concession.

Form and communicative value

The basic frame is:

(subject) + tuy + predicate/clause + nhưng + predicate/clause

The subject may precede tuy and be understood in both halves, or each half may have its own subject.

Căn nhà này tuy cũ nhưng rất chắc chắn.

Although this house is old, it is very solid.

Tuy tôi đã nhắn trước nhưng anh ấy vẫn không để cửa cho tôi.

Although I sent a message beforehand, he still did not leave the door unlocked for me.

In the first sentence, căn nhà này is the topic shared by cũ and chắc chắn. No copula meaning is appears before either adjective. In the second, two subjects are explicit because the people differ. Vẫn adds “still/nevertheless”; it does not replace nhưng, though Tuy tôi đã nhắn trước, anh ấy vẫn... is also complete.

Shape	Best use	Register
tuy P nhưng Q	balanced, explicit factual concession	neutral; common in careful speech and writing
P tuy X nhưng Y	one topic contrasted along two predicates	neutral
tuy P, Q vẫn...	focus on the persistence of Q	neutral
P, nhưng Q	plain contrast without packaging P as subordinate	very common in speech
Q, tuy P	result first, with the concession added as a qualification	compact or edited prose

💡

Choose tuy...nhưng when you want the reader to weigh two accepted facts together. Choose plain nhưng when you merely add a contrasting assertion. The truth conditions can be similar, but the information structure differs.

Tuy compared with dù

Tuy most readily concedes something treated as actual or established. Dù is broader and especially natural with hypothetical extremes or “no matter” readings.

Tuy trời mưa nhưng trận đấu vẫn diễn ra.

Although it was raining, the match still took place.

Dù mai trời mưa, trận đấu vẫn sẽ diễn ra.

Even if it rains tomorrow, the match will still take place.

The first sentence reports rain as part of the actual scene. The second ranges over a possible future. Everyday usage overlaps: speakers can use dù for an actual fact, and context can give tuy a projected reading. Treat actual versus hypothetical as a strong tendency, not an inflexible law.

Do not combine tuy and dù as a single opening; choose the one that fits the intended reading:

Tuy kế hoạch đơn giản nhưng khâu thực hiện lại khá phức tạp.

Although the plan is simple, the implementation is rather complicated.

The particle lại highlights a counter-expectation: implementation turns out to have the opposite property. In such descriptive balancing, tuy...nhưng...lại is highly natural.

Position, omission, and clause chains

The normal order is conceded fact first, counterweight second. A result-first sentence followed by tuy P is also grammatical, especially in compact or edited prose, though neutral conversation often prefers dù, mặc dù, or a separate connector. A trailing tuy P is a qualification and therefore does not take a later nhưng: Cô ấy vẫn đi làm, tuy đang bị ốm “She still went to work, although she was ill.” Within a shared-topic sentence, tuy naturally follows the topic:

Bộ phim tuy dài nhưng không hề chậm; xem xong tôi vẫn muốn xem lại.

Although the film is long, it is not slow at all; after finishing it, I still wanted to watch it again.

The semicolon begins a new discourse step. Xem xong is a compact temporal clause, not another half of tuy...nhưng. In long clause chains, the reader expects nhưng to close the concession before a new causal, temporal, or conditional relation begins.

Tuy trước khi họp tôi đã gửi tài liệu để mọi người đọc nhưng vì nhiều người bận nên cuộc thảo luận vẫn kéo dài.

Although I sent the materials before the meeting for everyone to read, because many people were busy, the discussion still ran long.

Here trước khi establishes time, để purpose, tuy...nhưng...vẫn the outer concession, and vì...nên the actual cause of the long discussion. The sentence is dense but recoverable because every linker has a partner and a clear scope.

Complements, relatives, and reported speech

The following minimal set shows why connectors cannot be translated word for word:

Model	Function
Tôi biết rằng anh ấy đến.	rằng introduces the content known
người mà tôi gặp	mà introduces a postnominal modifier
nếu trời mưa thì ở nhà	nếu...thì makes one event conditional on another
vì bận nên tôi về sớm	vì...nên links an asserted cause and result
tuy bận nhưng tôi vẫn đến	tuy...nhưng/vẫn concedes the obstacle and preserves the result

Tôi biết rằng người mà tôi gặp hôm qua tuy ít nói nhưng rất đáng tin.

I know that the person I met yesterday is quiet but very trustworthy.

The complement of biết contains a relative noun phrase and a shared-topic tuy...nhưng contrast. In informal speech, Tôi biết người tôi gặp hôm qua tuy ít nói nhưng rất đáng tin is natural: rằng and relative mà can both be absent when boundaries remain clear.

Mai kể rằng tuy lúc đầu cô ấy định từ chối nhưng sau khi nghe giải thích, cô ấy đã đồng ý.

Mai said that although she had initially intended to refuse, after hearing the explanation she agreed.

Vietnamese reported speech has no obligatory tense backshift. Lúc đầu, sau khi, and đã organize the timeline. The pronoun cô ấy reflects the reporter's viewpoint; direct speech would use tôi: Mai nói: “Tuy lúc đầu tôi định từ chối nhưng...”.

Conditions and purposes inside a concession

A condition can occupy either side provided the scopes are clear:

Tuy nếu đi tàu thì rẻ hơn nhưng chúng ta sẽ mất gần cả ngày.

Although taking the train would be cheaper, we would lose nearly the whole day.

The embedded nếu...thì evaluates one option; the outer tuy...nhưng weighs its benefit against a cost. In speech, a lighter version is often better: Đi tàu thì rẻ hơn, nhưng mất gần cả ngày. Full pairing suits deliberate comparison.

Purpose does not compete with concession:

Tuy anh ấy đến để xin lỗi nhưng cách nói của anh ấy lại khiến mọi người khó chịu hơn.

Although he came to apologize, the way he spoke made everyone even more uncomfortable.

Để xin lỗi explains the intended purpose; tuy...nhưng...lại contrasts that intention with the actual effect.

Short dialogue: assertion versus concession

A: Quán đó đắt, chắc không đáng thử đâu. B: Tuy hơi đắt nhưng đồ ăn ngon và phục vụ rất chu đáo. A: Vậy cuối tuần mình đặt bàn nhé.

A: That restaurant is expensive; it probably isn't worth trying. B: Although it's a little expensive, the food is good and the service is very attentive. A: Then let's book a table this weekend.

B does not deny A's claim. Tuy explicitly accepts the price as a drawback, while nhưng changes which conclusion follows from it. A plain Quán đắt nhưng ngon reports two contrasting traits; tuy...nhưng sounds more argumentative because it grants a point before rebutting the expected judgment.

Common Mistakes

1. Adding a copula before Vietnamese adjectives

❌ Căn hộ tuy là nhỏ nhưng là sáng.

Incorrect: ordinary predicative adjectives do not need a copula equivalent to English ‘is.’

✅ Căn hộ tuy nhỏ nhưng sáng.

Although the apartment is small, it is bright.

Là is possible in identificational or marked focus structures, but it is not the routine support verb English requires.

2. Mismatching concession and cause

❌ Tuy tôi đã đặt bàn nên chúng tôi vẫn phải chờ.

Incorrect: tuy opens a concession, while nên incorrectly closes a cause-result pair.

✅ Tuy tôi đã đặt bàn nhưng chúng tôi vẫn phải chờ.

Although I had booked a table, we still had to wait.

If the reservation caused a result, use vì...nên. Here waiting violates the expectation created by booking, so nhưng/vẫn is required.

3. Copying English relative-pronoun order

❌ Người ai tôi gặp tuy trẻ nhưng rất giàu kinh nghiệm.

Incorrect: ai cannot be inserted as an English-style relative ‘who/whom.’

✅ Người mà tôi gặp tuy trẻ nhưng rất giàu kinh nghiệm.

The person I met is young but very experienced.

The object gap after gặp corresponds to English whom; mà is an optional linker, while ai is not a relative pronoun that can fill the gap.

4. Overloading casual reports with rằng

Tớ nghĩ rằng tuy chỗ đó xa nhưng vẫn đáng đi.

I think that although that place is far away, it is still worth visiting. (correct but formal-sounding in casual conversation)

✅ Tớ thấy chỗ đó tuy xa nhưng vẫn đáng đi.

I think that place is far away but still worth visiting. (natural, informal)

Do not mechanically translate English that. Keep rằng when a formal report or a difficult boundary benefits from it.

5. Pairing tuy with a purely hypothetical “no matter” reading

❌ Tuy ai nói gì, tôi cũng không đổi ý.

Awkward for the intended ‘no matter what anyone says’ free-choice reading.

✅ Dù ai nói gì, tôi cũng không đổi ý.

No matter what anyone says, I will not change my mind.

Dù...cũng ranges over possibilities. Reserve tuy for a conceded proposition treated as the relevant fact or premise.

Key Takeaways

Tuy P nhưng Q acknowledges P and balances it against an unexpected Q.
A shared topic can precede the pair: N tuy X nhưng Y; ordinary adjective predicates need no copula.
Tuy tends toward factual concession, while dù readily covers hypothetical and free-choice meanings.
Full pairing helps with long sentences, but natural Vietnamese also uses tuy P, Q vẫn... and plain P nhưng Q.

Now practice Vietnamese

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Vietnamese →