The opening of Branko Radičević's elegy commonly titled „Кад млидијах умрети“ makes an autumn landscape carry a speaker's awareness of mortality. Four short lines combine nineteenth-century poetic vocabulary, a contracted infinitive, unusual object marking, delayed negation, and interlocking rhyme. This page uses a public-domain text reproduced in a University of Belgrade Faculty of Philology examination booklet.
What Kind of Edition Is This?
The four lines below reproduce that booklet's reading text, including лисје, веће, зеленога, and видет. They are not claimed to be a diplomatic transcription of Radičević's manuscript. Other editions print an apostrophe in видет’, vary punctuation, or give the title as „Кад млидија умрети“. Those differences belong to editions; a quotation must name its witness instead of silently combining them.
Complete Stanza and Idiomatic Translation
Лисје жути веће по дрвећу,
The leaves are already yellowing on the trees,
Лисје жуто доле веће пада,
the yellow leaves are already falling down,
Зеленога више ја никада / Видет нећу.
Never again will I see it green.
The English translation joins lines 3–4 because Serbian postpones the negative predicate видет нећу until the end. A word-for-word sequence—“of-green more I never / see will-not”—would preserve order while obscuring syntax and emotional force.
Line 1: Лисје жути
Лисје is a poetic/older collective corresponding to contemporary neutral лишће “foliage, leaves.” Жути is not the adjective yellow here. It is the third-person singular present of imperfective жутети, “to become yellow.” The collective subject is grammatically singular:
Лишће већ жути по дрвећу.
The leaves are already yellowing on the trees. (contemporary neutral prose)
English treats leaves as plural. Serbian collective лишће is neuter singular, so a finite predicate is singular: лишће жути, not лишће жуте.
The locative по дрвећу distributes the leaves across the trees. Дрвеће is another collective neuter singular. A literal along the trees misses the distributed visual scene; idiomatic English uses on the trees.
Line 2: From Process to State
The near repetition contains a precise shift:
- лисје жути — the foliage is turning yellow; жути is a verb;
- лисје жуто — yellow foliage; жуто is an agreeing adjective.
Лишће жути, а жуто лишће већ пада на стазу.
The leaves are turning yellow, and the yellow leaves are already falling onto the path.
The poem turns an ongoing change into a visible state and then into downward motion. Пада is imperfective present, but the poetic present makes the scene unfold before the reader rather than reporting one completed fall.
Веће is the older/poetic form corresponding to modern већ “already.” It occurs in both opening lines and fills out the rhythm. Learners should recognize it in historical literature, not replace modern већ with веће in neutral conversation.
У савременом разговору кажемо: „Лишће већ пада.“
In contemporary conversation we say: ‘The leaves are already falling.’
Lines 3–4: Ellipsis and Delayed Negation
The hardest phrase is зеленога ... видет нећу. Зеленога is a substantivized long adjective form: the understood leaf-mass noun is omitted. Its form is compatible with the older genitive under negation, a pattern much more visible in historical and poetic Serbian than in ordinary contemporary speech. The basic sense is “I will not see green foliage again.”
A modern prose paraphrase can avoid the historical syntax:
Више никада нећу видети зелено лишће.
I will never see green foliage again.
That close modern paraphrase restores the understood noun and replaces the historical genitive object with the accusative. A more interpretive version can make the seasonal implication explicit:
Нећу дочекати да лишће поново озелени.
I will not live to see the leaves turn green again.
Neither sentence replaces the poem. The first stays close to its grammar, while the second adds the inference that the speaker will not survive until the next renewal. The original зеленога foregrounds the lost greenness before revealing the speaker's ја and final negative predicate.
Видет is a contracted infinitive of видети, marked (poetic/colloquial in limited contexts) rather than neutral written prose. Some editors print видет’ to show truncation explicitly. The selected witness prints видет without an apostrophe, so that is what the quotation preserves.
У необележеној савременој прози пишемо: „Нећу то више видети.“
In unmarked contemporary prose we write: ‘I won't see that again.’
Poetic Word Order and Information Structure
Neutral future negation is нећу видети. The poem reverses it to видет нећу, pushes the predicate to the last line, and separates it from its object-like adjective зеленога. This is not random freedom:
- зеленога introduces what will be lost;
- више ја никада expands the loss into permanence and personal fate;
- видет нећу releases the delayed negative conclusion.
Ја то више никада нећу видети.
I will never see that again. (neutral order)
The modern sentence is grammatical and emotionally clear, but it has none of the stanza's suspension. See poetic word order for how verse exploits delayed dependents without abandoning case and agreement.
Rhyme and Sound Structure
The end words interlock: дрвећу—нећу and пада—никада. The four lines therefore create an enclosing ABBA rhyme rather than four isolated statements. Repetition supplies another layer:
- лисје begins both landscape lines;
- веће returns in the same late position;
- жути—жуто changes category with one vowel;
- више—никада—нећу accumulates negation.
Ordinary Serbian spelling does not mark pitch accent or vowel length, and the poem here is printed without specialist marks. Metrical stress should not be confused with dictionary pitch accent. A reader may emphasize никада, but should not insert an invented accent sign into the quotation.
Emotional and Historical Register
This is (literary, nineteenth-century) Serbian. Autumn is not merely scenery: the leaves will become green again, but the speaker believes he will not live to see them. The first two lines remain impersonal; ја arrives only when natural recurrence is contrasted with personal finality.
Природа ће се обновити, али лирски субјект страхује да тај повратак неће дочекати.
Nature will renew itself, but the lyric speaker fears that he will not live to see that return.
That sentence is an interpretive paraphrase, not a quotation. It makes the temporal contrast explicit but removes the poem's image, rhyme, and delayed disclosure.
The forms лисје, веће, зеленога, видет should not be copied wholesale into neutral conversation. A contemporary poet may use them deliberately; a learner using them unmarked in an email would sound archaizing or theatrical.
Common Mistakes
Reading жути as a plural adjective
❌ У првом стиху „жути“ је придев који се слаже са множином „лисје“.
Incorrect—жути is a singular present-tense verb, and лисје is a collective singular.
✅ У првом стиху лисје постаје жуто: оно жути.
In the first line the foliage is becoming yellow: it is yellowing.
Modernizing inside an attributed quotation
❌ Радичевић у овом издању пише: „Лишће већ жути по дрвећу.“
Incorrect citation practice—the sentence is a modernization, not the wording of the selected witness.
✅ У модернизованом читању: „Лишће већ жути по дрвећу.“
In a modernized reading: ‘The leaves are already yellowing on the trees.’
Treating the line break as a full stop
❌ „Зеленога више ја никада“ тумачимо као самосталну реченицу.
Incorrect—the phrase depends on the following видет нећу.
✅ Трећи и четврти стих заједно граде одричну реченицу.
The third and fourth lines together form a negative sentence.
Using the poetic contraction as neutral formal prose
❌ У службеном допису ћу написати: „Одговор видет нећу.“
Register error—contracted видет and reversed order are poetic or marked, not neutral administrative prose.
✅ У службеном допису пишем: „Одговор нећу видети пре понедељка.“
In an official message I write: ‘I will not see the reply before Monday.’
Key Takeaways
- In лисје жути, жути is a verb; in лисје жуто, жуто is an adjective.
- Older веће corresponds to modern већ, while лисје corresponds to neutral лишће.
- Зеленога ... видет нећу combines ellipsis, older negative object marking, contraction, and delayed negation.
- The text is a named reading witness, not a diplomatic manuscript transcription.
- Modernization and interpretive paraphrase must be labeled outside quotation.
Reuse Exercises
- Turn all four lines into two sentences of neutral contemporary prose. Preserve the shift from yellowing process to yellow state.
- Restore the understood noun after зеленога, then explain why a modern editor might choose a different construction rather than merely changing the ending.
- Keep the original vocabulary but reorder lines 3–4 into neutral syntax. Read both versions aloud and describe how postponing нећу changes the emotional release.
Now practice Serbian
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Serbian →Related Topics
- Word Order in Headlines, Proverbs, and VerseC1 — A focused guide to word order in headlines, proverbs, and verse in Serbian.
- Literary SerbianC1 — A focused guide to literary serbian in Serbian.
- Ellipsis and GappingC1 — Omitting recoverable verbs, subjects, and clitics.
- Genitive of NegationB1 — Why negated existence and some negated objects take the genitive.
- Church Slavonic and Vernacular DoubletsC2 — Advanced coverage of church slavonic and vernacular doublets in Serbian.