Archaic Passive Infinitive in -ier

Early and poetic Latin can use a present passive infinitive in -ier where standard Classical prose normally has -ī: amārier beside amārī “to be loved,” monērier beside monērī “to be warned,” and dīcier beside dīcī “to be said.” The longer form is (archaic) and (literary), especially common in early drama and Lucretius and occasionally revived by later poets.

The ending changes neither tense nor voice. It is not a future, a perfect, or a personal form. For active verbs it remains a present passive infinitive; for deponents, whose passive morphology carries an active lexical meaning, the same archaic ending can appear with active translation.

How the form is built

The second principal part reveals the present stem and conjugation. A practical recognition rule is to compare the ordinary present passive infinitive and replace its final -ī with -ier:

ConjugationPrincipal partsStandard infinitiveArchaic/poetic form
firstamō, amāre, amāvī, amātumamārīamārier
secondmoneō, monēre, monuī, monitummonērīmonērier
thirddīcō, dīcere, dīxī, dictumdīcīdīcier
third -iōcapiō, capere, cēpī, captumcapīcapier
fourthaudiō, audīre, audīvī, audītumaudīrīaudīrier

This is a present-system formation. The perfect stem dīx- and supine stem dict- do not participate. Forms such as dīxier or dictier therefore cannot be built merely because English says “to be said.”

Nēmō vult sine causā accūsārier.

No one wants to be accused without cause. (archaic/poetic)

Poēta carmina sua ā multīs audīrier cupit.

The poet wants his poems to be heard by many. (deliberately archaizing)

In active production, use standard accūsārī and audīrī unless you are imitating an early or poetic register. Recognition is far more important than creative use.

💡
The extra syllable is not decorative spelling. In verse, amārier and amārī offer different metrical shapes, which helps explain the older form's survival in poetry.

No person or number, but real tense and voice

An infinitive is non-finite: it has no first, second, or third person and no singular/plural personal ending. Its understood or expressed subject comes from syntax. In accusative-and-infinitive indirect statement, that subject is accusative.

Dīcunt urbem ā cīvibus servārier.

They say that the city is being saved by its citizens. (archaic/poetic)

Dīxērunt urbem ā cīvibus servārier.

They said that the city was being saved by its citizens. (archaic/poetic)

Both use present infinitive servārier. “Present” here means simultaneous with the governing verb: it is being saved when they speak in the first sentence and was being saved when they spoke in the second. English tense changes because the reporting verb changes; the Latin infinitive does not become imperfect.

The passive subject is the patient, while an expressed personal agent normally takes ā/ab plus ablative. This is the same syntax as standard servārī.

Spērāmus pācem sine novō bellō comparārier posse.

We hope that peace can be secured without a new war. (archaic/poetic)

Here pācem is the accusative subject of passive comparārier and also the understood subject of posse. The sequence of infinitives may feel unlike English, but changing the archaic ending does not change the construction.

Deponents keep their active lexical meaning

Deponent verbs have passive-looking forms but normally active meanings. Their standard present infinitive hortārī “to encourage” can appear as archaic hortārier; sequī “to follow” can appear as sequier. The ending does not make a deponent semantically passive.

Dux mīlitēs hortārier coepit.

The commander began to encourage the soldiers. (archaic/poetic)

Nauta ducem per tenebrās sequier nōluit.

The sailor refused to follow the leader through the darkness. (archaic/poetic)

This is a place where an English-first analysis fails badly. English “to be encouraged” would require a passive analysis, but Latin starts from the lexical fact that hortor is deponent. Consult what deponent verbs are when the apparent voice and translation diverge.

Authentic examples and their register

Plautus uses the ending naturally in comic dialogue and social observation:

et qui ipsi sat habent quod in se possit vere dicier

and those who themselves have plenty that can truthfully be said against them — Plautus, Curculio 479

The quotation is reproduced in source spelling. Dīcier is the present passive infinitive of dīcō, governed by possit: “can be said.” Its appearance is consistent with early Latin, not an error for Classical-prose dīcī.

Catullus deliberately uses the longer infinitive in elegiac verse:

atqui nec divis homines componier aequum est

and yet it is not right for human beings to be compared with gods — Catullus 68.141

Here hominēs is the accusative subject of passive componier. The form is from compōnō, compōnere, composuī, compositum, but the relevant stem is present compōn-, not perfect composu- or supine composit-.

💡
Authentic quotations are left unmacronized because ancient and critical texts do not normally print pedagogical quantity marks. The macronized headword compōnier records analysis, not a claim about Catullus' manuscript spelling.

A parsing decision routine

When a word ends in -ier:

  1. Test whether replacing -ier with -ī produces an attested present passive or deponent infinitive.
  2. Recover the present stem from the first two principal parts.
  3. Identify the governing verb or impersonal expression.
  4. Find any accusative subject and passive agent.
  5. Translate the infinitive as simultaneous with its governing verb.
  6. Mark its register (archaic/literary) rather than treating it as neutral prose.

This procedure is more reliable than starting from an English “to be” phrase, which supplies neither the Latin stem nor the historical ending.

Common Mistakes

1. Treating -ier as a future marker

❌ Crās urbs servārier.

Incorrect as a complete sentence meaning ‘tomorrow the city will be saved’—servārier is a non-finite present passive infinitive.

✅ Spērant urbem crās servārier posse.

They hope that the city can be saved tomorrow. (archaic/poetic)

2. Building from the perfect or supine stem

❌ Hoc dictier potest.

Incorrect—the present passive infinitive comes from present stem dīc-, not supine stem dict-.

✅ Hoc dīcier potest.

This can be said. (archaic/poetic)

3. Giving an indirect-statement subject nominative case

❌ Dīcit urbs servārier.

Incorrect for ‘he says that the city is being saved’—the infinitive's expressed subject must be accusative.

✅ Dīcit urbem servārier.

He says that the city is being saved. (archaic/poetic)

4. Translating a deponent infinitive as passive

⚠️ Dux coepit hortārier.

Valid Latin, but wrongly translated ‘the commander began to be encouraged’—hortor is deponent.

✅ Dux suōs hortārier coepit.

The commander began to encourage his men. (archaic/poetic)

Key Takeaways

The ending -ier marks an archaic and poetic present passive infinitive, or the corresponding deponent infinitive. It has no person or number and expresses time relative to its governing verb. Recover the present stem, preserve passive or deponent syntax, and recognize the register; in ordinary Classical prose composition, use the standard infinitive in -ī.

Now practice Latin

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Latin →

Related Topics