Passive Indirect Statement | Latin Grammar

A passive indirect statement reports a proposition such as “the gate is being opened” without asserting who opens it. Classical Latin normally puts the reported subject in the accusative and expresses the reported predicate with a passive infinitive: dīcit portam aperīrī, “he says that the gate is being opened.” The construction is common in conversation, narrative, historiography, and (formal) prose.

English supplies the conjunction “that” and a finite passive verb. Latin supplies neither. To parse accurately, first find the governing verb of saying, thinking, knowing, hearing, or perceiving; then identify an accusative that can serve as the infinitive’s subject; only afterward translate the whole proposition.

The Three Passive Infinitives

Passive infinitives preserve the same relative-time system as active infinitives. “Present,” “perfect,” and “future” mean simultaneous with, anterior to, and posterior to the governing verb.

Time relation	Form	Model with porta	Typical English
simultaneous	present passive infinitive	portam aperīrī	that the gate is/was being opened
anterior	perfect passive participle + esse	portam apertam esse	that the gate has/had been opened
posterior	supine in -um + īrī	portam apertum īrī	that the gate will/would be opened

Custōs dīcit portam aperīrī.

The guard says that the gate is being opened.

Custōs dīxit portam aperīrī.

The guard said that the gate was being opened.

The visible form aperīrī is unchanged. Past dīxit moves the point of reference into the past, so English naturally uses “was being opened.” See Tense Relations in Infinitives for the complete timeline system.

💡

A passive infinitive has no accusative direct object. If an accusative beside it names what undergoes the action, test that noun as the infinitive’s subject: portam aperīrī means “the gate to be opened,” not “to open the gate.”

Present Passive: An Event in Progress or a General Fact

The present passive infinitive is a single word: amārī, monērī, regī, capī, audīrī. In indirect statement it places the passive situation at the same time as the governing verb. Context decides whether English prefers a progressive passive (“is being repaired”) or a stative or habitual expression (“is respected,” “is regularly read”).

Vīcīnī audiunt pontem reficī.

The neighbors hear that the bridge is being repaired.

Omnēs sciunt hunc medicum magnī aestimārī.

Everyone knows that this doctor is highly regarded.

In the first sentence, ongoing work favors “is being repaired.” In the second, aestimārī describes an enduring reputation. The morphology itself does not encode English progressive aspect.

An agent, when expressed, keeps the case required inside the passive proposition. A personal agent normally takes ā/ab plus the ablative; an instrument takes the bare ablative.

Nūntius rettulit urbem ā mīlitibus dēfendī.

The messenger reported that the city was being defended by the soldiers.

Here urbem is accusative because it is the subject of dēfendī, while ā mīlitibus remains an ablative of personal agent. Free word order can place either phrase first, but their endings preserve their roles.

Perfect Passive: Agreement Reveals the Subject

The perfect passive infinitive is composed of a perfect passive participle and esse: laudātum esse, monitum esse, captum esse, audītum esse. Unlike an English participle after “have,” the Latin participle agrees with its accusative subject in gender and number.

Mārcus putat epistulam iam missam esse.

Marcus thinks that the letter has already been sent.

Mārcus putābat epistulās iam missās esse.

Marcus thought that the letters had already been sent.

Feminine singular missam points to epistulam; feminine plural missās points to epistulās. The pair therefore functions as a structural signal even when other words intervene. In concise (formal) and (literary) prose, esse can be omitted when the compound form remains unmistakable: epistulās missās putat can mean “he thinks the letters have been sent.” Learners should keep esse in their own early composition because epistulās missās by itself can also look like a noun phrase, “the sent letters.”

Mercātor negāvit pecūniam sibi trāditam esse.

The merchant denied that the money had been handed over to him.

The dative sibi belongs within the reported proposition. It is the recipient of trāditam esse, not an argument of negāvit. This is why parsing heads and dependencies must come before copying English order.

💡

With a compound passive infinitive, circle the participle and find the accusative noun with matching gender and number. That agreement often reveals the clause skeleton faster than word order does.

Future Passive: The Invariant Supine

The regular future passive infinitive is formed from the accusative supine in -um plus impersonal īrī, the present passive infinitive of eō: captum īrī, monitum īrī, apertum īrī. It is chiefly (formal) and comparatively rare. Most importantly, its supine is invariant: it does not agree with the accusative subject.

Dux spērāt urbem sine morā captum īrī.

The commander hopes that the city will be captured without delay.

Legātī crēdēbant obsidēs posterō diē līberātum īrī.

The envoys believed that the hostages would be released the next day.

Although urbem is feminine singular and obsidēs plural, captum and līberātum remain neuter-looking singular forms in -um. They are supines, not agreeing participles. Because many verbs lack a convenient or current supine and because -um īrī can feel heavy, Classical prose also uses fore ut followed by a subjunctive; Fore and Futurum Esse Ut explains that alternative.

A Reliable Parsing and Production Test

For reading, use this sequence:

Find the speech-or-thought verb: dīcit, putat, audīvit, negāvit.
Identify the infinitive and its voice: claudī, clausam esse, or clausum īrī.
Find the accusative subject by meaning and, with a perfect form, by participial agreement.
Attach local dependents—agent, instrument, recipient, adverb—to the infinitive.
Determine relative time; only then choose an idiomatic English tense.

For production, begin with the direct proposition and convert its nominative subject to the accusative:

Direct: Portae clausae sunt. Indirect: Scīmus portās clausās esse.

Direct: The gates have been closed. Indirect: We know that the gates have been closed.

This minimal contrast shows why English order is a poor guide. English begins “we know that the gates,” but Latin may write portās scīmus clausās esse to foreground the gates. Accusative portās and agreeing clausās still identify the embedded proposition.

Ambiguity, Context, and Information Structure

Some endings permit more than one initial parse. Puellae laudātae can be nominative plural, genitive singular, or dative singular in isolation. Inside dīcit puellās laudātās esse, however, accusative plural puellās and laudātās fix the perfect passive indirect statement. Where morphology remains genuinely ambiguous, discourse supplies the intended subject and focus.

Latin also moves a salient embedded subject or complement toward the beginning without changing its dependency. In (literary) narrative, urbem captam esse hostēs nūntiāvērunt foregrounds urbem: “As for the city, the enemy announced that it had been captured.” It does not make urbem the object of nūntiāvērunt.

Passive reporting verbs can create a related but different pattern, the nominative-and-infinitive: mīlitēs venīre dīcuntur, “the soldiers are said to be coming.” There mīlitēs is nominative because it is the subject of passive dīcuntur. Do not silently mix that construction with an active governing verb followed by accusative-and-infinitive.

Common Mistakes

Treating the embedded subject as a direct object

❌ Dīcit portam aperīrī = ‘He says to open the gate.’

Incorrect — portam is the subject of passive aperīrī.

✅ Dīcit portam aperīrī.

He says that the gate is being opened.

Copying English constituent order instead of reading endings

❌ Putat ā fabrīs domum reficere.

Incorrect for ‘he thinks the house is being repaired by the craftsmen’; reficere is active and leaves domum as its object.

✅ Putat domum ā fabrīs reficī.

He thinks that the house is being repaired by the craftsmen.

Leaving the perfect participle uninflected

❌ Scīmus portās clausum esse.

Incorrect — the perfect participle must agree with feminine plural portās.

✅ Scīmus portās clausās esse.

We know that the gates have been closed.

Making the future passive supine agree

❌ Spērant portās clausās īrī.

Incorrect — future passive clausum īrī contains an invariant supine.

✅ Spērant portās clausum īrī.

They hope that the gates will be closed.

Using nominative after an active reporting verb

❌ Nūntiat urbs captam esse.

Incorrect — active nūntiat requires an accusative subject in this indirect statement.

✅ Nūntiat urbem captam esse.

He reports that the city has been captured.

Key Takeaways

An active reporting verb normally introduces an accusative subject plus passive infinitive.
Present, perfect, and future passive infinitives mark simultaneous, anterior, and posterior events.
The perfect passive participle agrees with its subject, but the future passive supine in -um īrī is invariant.
Case, agreement, and context identify dependencies even when Latin fronting disrupts English-like order.

The durable principle is structural: an active reporting verb licenses an accusative-and-infinitive proposition; passive voice determines the infinitive’s argument roles; relative tense locates its event. Word order then manages topic and emphasis, not basic case government.

Now practice Latin

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Latin →