Hic, Iste, Ille, or Is? | Latin Grammar

Latin hic, iste, ille, and is can all become English “this,” “that,” or “he,” but they do not present a referent from the same viewpoint. Hic places it near the speaker or in the speaker’s current focus; iste connects it with the addressee; ille places it farther away or outside the immediate sphere; is simply retrieves an already identifiable referent. The reliable choice therefore begins with discourse context, not an English gloss.

These words decline for gender, number, and case. First determine what syntactic job the form must perform; only then decide which demonstrative viewpoint fits. The broader paradigms are treated on Demonstrative is, ea, id and Demonstratives as Discourse Organizers.

The four-way contrast

Choice	Core diagnostic	Typical English rendering
hic, haec, hoc	near the speaker; present situation; speaker’s current topic	this, this person
iste, ista, istud	near or associated with the addressee	that by you, that of yours
ille, illa, illud	remote from speaker and addressee; well-known or emphatically distinct	that over there, that famous
is, ea, id	unmarked retrieval of an antecedent	he, she, it; that person

💡

Run two tests. First ask, “Am I pointing from a physical or conversational viewpoint?” If yes, choose among hic–iste–ille. If no, and the word merely resumes an antecedent, choose is. Then supply the case required by Latin syntax.

Hic: here with me, or here in the argument

Use hic for something in the speaker’s sphere: an object held by the speaker, people on the speaker’s side, the present time, or the point currently under discussion. In prose, it may also direct attention forward to what the speaker is about to state.

Hunc librum lege; illum postrēmō tibi dabō.

Read this book here; I will give you that one over there last.

Haec sententia mihi placet: amīcitia sine fide nōn manet.

This proposition pleases me: friendship does not endure without trust.

The first hunc is deictic: the speaker identifies the nearby book. The second haec is discourse-deictic: it points to the statement that follows. English uses “this” in both settings, but Latin lets the same speaker-centered relation extend from physical space to the structure of an argument.

Iste: in your sphere

Use iste when the referent belongs to, stands near, or has just been introduced by the addressee. In courtroom and polemical prose iste often acquires a dismissive force—“that fellow of yours” or “that man there”—because an opponent is being placed in the other side’s sphere. That coloring is pragmatic, not part of the pronoun’s dictionary meaning: in neutral interaction, iste can simply mean “that by you.”

Quid in istā epistulā scrīpsistī?

What did you write in that letter of yours?

Istum mihi pōculum trāde.

Pass me that cup beside you.

Iste homō omnia negat.

That fellow denies everything. (formal forensic, potentially contemptuous)

💡

Do not translate every iste with a sneer. Add contempt only when the surrounding tone—especially accusation, invective, or hostile contrast—supports it.

Ille: over there, back then, or notably distinct

Use ille for physical or conceptual distance from the immediate participants. It can point to someone absent, a former time, or a celebrated person assumed to be recognizable: ille Caesar can mean “that famous Caesar.” This recognitional use is especially at home in elevated prose and poetry (literary).

Videsne illam turrim trāns flūmen?

Do you see that tower across the river?

Illō tempore Rōma grave perīculum sustinēbat.

At that time Rome was enduring a serious danger.

Ille Dēmosthenēs summus ōrātor habēbātur.

That renowned Demosthenes was considered the greatest orator. (formal/literary)

Distance need not be measurable. Ille can remove one alternative from the speaker’s immediate focus or contrast “the former” with “the latter.” In a two-member contrast, Latin often uses hic for the nearer or latter-mentioned item and ille for the more remote or former-mentioned one; context, however, remains more important than a mechanical “former/latter” translation.

Is: retrieve, do not point

Is, ea, id is the weak, unmarked anaphoric demonstrative. It identifies a person or thing already recoverable from the preceding sentence or a relative clause. It does not normally tell the hearer where the referent stands.

Lūcia medicum arcessīvit; is statim vēnit.

Lucia summoned a doctor; he came at once.

Eum librum quaerō quem herī mihi ostendistī.

I am looking for the book that you showed me yesterday.

In the first example, is merely resumes medicum. Hic would re-present the doctor as now salient—roughly “this man”—and ille would mark distance or distinction. Latin often omits a nominative pronoun altogether when the subject remains obvious; expressed is helps prevent ambiguity or creates a clean link between clauses.

Six contrasts that expose the choice

These pairs keep case and referent constant while changing viewpoint.

Hic servus mēcum venit.
This slave here is coming with me. (speaker’s sphere)
Iste servus tēcum venit.
That slave with you is coming. (addressee’s sphere)
Hanc tabulam teneō.
I am holding this tablet.
Illam tabulam in pariete videō.
I see that tablet over there on the wall.
Mārcus aderat; is tamen tacēbat.
Marcus was present; he nevertheless remained silent. (simple anaphora)
Mārcus aderat; hic tamen causam dēfendit.
Marcus was present; this man, however, defended the case. (renewed focus)
Quid dē hōc cōnsiliō putās?
What do you think about this plan I am presenting?
Quid dē istō cōnsiliō putās?
What do you think about that plan of yours?
Ea verba audīvī et discessī.
I heard those words already mentioned and left.
Haec verba nunc audī: nōn revertar.
Hear these words now: I shall not return.
Is poēta carmen recitāvit.
That poet already mentioned recited a poem.
Ille poēta carmen recitāvit.
That distinguished or distant poet recited a poem.

Notice that no English-only rule could choose correctly: “that plan” may be istud cōnsilium if associated with “you,” illud cōnsilium if remote or rejected, or id cōnsilium if merely resumed.

Parsing visible forms before translating

Several forms are distinctive: hunc is masculine accusative singular, huic dative singular of any gender, and hīs dative or ablative plural. Yet forms such as haec or illa are ambiguous until agreement and syntax settle the parse. In haec fēmina venit, haec is feminine nominative singular; in haec dona portat, it is neuter accusative plural.

Haec fēmina haec dōna portat.

This woman carries these gifts.

Do not decide that the first and second haec have the same number. Check agreement with fēmina and dōna, then identify subject and object, and only then translate.

Short decision drill

Choose the bold headword, inflecting it as required.

“Give me the key beside you.” → iste: Istam clāvem mihi dā. The key is in the addressee’s sphere; clāvem requires feminine accusative singular.
“Publius bought a farm; he lives there.” → is: Pūblius fundum ēmit; is ibi habitat. The pronoun simply resumes Publius.
“Look at that mountain in the distance.” → ille: Illum montem aspice. Physical remoteness controls the choice.
“This is my answer: I refuse.” → hic: Haec est respōnsiō mea: recūsō. The speaker points forward to the present answer.
“I reject that accusation of yours.” → iste: Istam accūsātiōnem tuam repellō. Addressee-association matters more than English “that.”

Common Mistakes

1. Using ille for every English “that”

❌ Illum librum mihi trāde.

Incorrect for ‘Pass me the book beside you’: ille marks remoteness, not the addressee’s sphere.

✅ Istum librum mihi trāde.

Pass me that book beside you.

2. Using a strong demonstrative for plain anaphora

❌ Lūcia medicum vocāvit; ille statim vēnit.

Misleading if no distance or contrast is intended: ille makes the doctor remote or marked.

✅ Lūcia medicum vocāvit; is statim vēnit.

Lucia called a doctor; he came at once.

3. Treating iste as automatically insulting

❌ Illum gladium quem tenēs mihi trāde.

Wrong demonstrative for the intended addressee-centered viewpoint: avoiding iste because it seems insulting loses the useful contrast.

✅ Istum gladium quem tenēs mihi trāde.

Pass me that sword you are holding; iste neutrally places it in the addressee’s sphere.

4. Choosing the right stem but the wrong case

❌ Huic librum legō.

Incorrect for ‘I read this book’: huic is dative, but the direct object must be accusative.

✅ Hunc librum legō.

I read this book.

The production order is therefore: establish the referent’s discourse relation (hic/iste/ille/is), establish gender and number, establish syntactic case, and only then select the visible form.

Key Takeaways

Hic is speaker-centered, iste addressee-centered, ille distal or recognitional, and is unmarked anaphora.
Viewpoint selects the stem; agreement and syntax select the visible case form.
An English “this” or “that” is evidence only after Latin discourse context has been tested.

Now practice Latin

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Latin →