A bare Indonesian root can be a complete predicate, but “bare” does not name one uniform construction. Makan, minum, tidur, and pergi are ordinary unaffixed predicates; baca and tulis also appear bare in commands, object voice, ellipsis, and casual actor-oriented speech. The grammar and register of the surrounding clause determine which use is licensed.
This page treats the advanced edge: relative clauses, extraction, agent interpretation, lexical restrictions, and realistic register distribution. The bare-root overview, argument guide, choice page, and aspect page cover the preceding layers. A bare root is not an English infinitive, and an Indonesian structure is not “incorrect” merely because English passive syntax organizes the same event differently.
Four sources of a bare predicate
The surface absence of an affix can arise for distinct reasons:
| Environment | Typical shape | Status |
|---|---|---|
| lexically bare predicate | makan, minum, tidur, pergi | neutral across registers |
| direct command | Baca pesannya! Tulis namamu! | neutral; politeness comes from the whole request |
| object voice | buku yang saya baca | standard, including formal prose |
| actor-oriented reduction | aku baca berita | informal and variety-sensitive |
Kami makan lebih awal karena kereta berangkat pukul tujuh.
We eat early because the train leaves at seven.
Anak-anak sudah minum sebelum tidur.
The children have already had a drink before going to sleep.
Baca petunjuknya sampai selesai sebelum menulis jawaban.
Read the instructions to the end before writing your answer.
Laporan yang saya tulis kemarin sudah diperiksa editor.
The report I wrote yesterday has already been checked by the editor.
Aku baca pesannya nanti saja, ya.
I'll just read the message later, okay? (informal)
These examples contain the same lack of visible prefix but not the same syntax. In particular, saya tulis is standard object voice, whereas casual aku baca pesannya is an actor-oriented reduction whose acceptability depends on register and variety.
Relative clauses expose the voice contrast
Indonesian relative clauses use yang, but the voice of the embedded verb reveals the role of the head noun. When the head noun is the actor, actor voice is natural with a transitive meN- family:
Orang yang membaca buku itu adalah dosen baru kami.
The person reading that book is our new lecturer.
Wartawan yang menulis artikel itu tinggal di Makassar.
The journalist who wrote that article lives in Makassar.
Lexically bare predicates remain bare when they head their ordinary clause type:
Anak yang makan di teras itu keponakan saya.
The child eating on the terrace is my niece or nephew.
Tamu yang pergi paling akhir membantu kami menutup pintu.
The guest who left last helped us close the door.
When the head noun is the patient of baca or tulis, Indonesian switches the embedded clause to an object-oriented voice. With a preverbal pronominal actor, the root is bare:
Buku yang saya baca di kereta ternyata milik Dina.
The book I read on the train turned out to be Dina's.
Surat yang mereka tulis tidak pernah dikirim.
The letter they wrote was never sent.
With an omitted or third-person actor, a di- relative is often the careful alternative:
Buku yang dibaca Rina membahas sejarah kota itu.
The book Rina read discusses the history of that city.
Surat yang ditulis tadi pagi masih ada di meja.
The letter written this morning is still on the desk.
English keeps read and write morphologically unchanged in both subject and object relatives. Indonesian instead coordinates relativization with voice: orang yang membaca buku but buku yang saya baca.
Extraction is sensitive to grammatical role
The same contrast appears in apa and siapa questions. An actor question can retain actor voice because the questioned participant is the actor.
Siapa yang membaca surat itu tadi pagi?
Who read that letter this morning?
An extracted patient favors object voice:
Apa yang sedang kamu baca?
What are you reading?
Surat mana yang akan Anda tulis lebih dahulu?
Which letter will you write first? (formal)
Keeping meN- after the preverbal actor would misalign the voice with the extracted patient: apa yang kamu membaca is not the neutral standard construction.
Not every related participant is a direct object. An instrument, location, or recipient cannot simply be treated like the patient of baca or tulis.
Inilah pena yang saya pakai untuk menulis surat itu.
This is the pen I used to write that letter.
Itulah kedai tempat kami minum kopi sebelum pergi.
That is the café where we drank coffee before leaving.
The instrument uses yang ... pakai untuk, while the location uses tempat. Bare object voice licenses extraction of the selected patient; it is not a general device for omitting any preposition.
Formal object voice is not “casual missing morphology”
The sequence patient + pronominal actor + bare root is fully standard, including in contracts, reports, and academic writing.
Data yang kami baca dari grafik tersebut menunjukkan penurunan yang konsisten.
The data we read from that graph show a consistent decline. (academic)
Kesimpulan yang kami tulis pada bagian akhir perlu diperjelas.
The conclusion we wrote in the final section needs clarification. (academic)
English has no direct morphological equivalent to this symmetrical voice pattern. Translating data yang kami baca as “data that we read” does not make the Indonesian clause active in the same structural sense: the patient is the relativized pivot, and kami is a preverbal actor inside object voice.
Third-person full nouns show more variation. Buku yang Rina baca is widespread in conversation (informal), while edited prose often prefers buku yang dibaca Rina. The difference is register and voice realization, not basic comprehensibility.
Film yang Raka tonton semalam bagus, enggak?
The film Raka watched last night was good, wasn't it? (informal)
Film yang ditonton Raka semalam meraih penghargaan internasional.
The film Raka watched last night won an international award. (formal)
Apparently agentless uses still have interpretation
Commands normally omit the addressee, but their actor is understood as “you.”
Minum obat ini setelah makan.
Take this medicine after eating.
Tulis nama lengkap Anda di sudut kanan atas.
Write your full name in the upper-right corner. (formal instruction)
Pergi sekarang dan jangan kembali sebelum saya menelepon.
Go now and do not come back before I call.
Nonfinite-looking adjuncts can also receive their actor from the main clause:
Sebelum tidur, saya selalu membaca beberapa halaman.
Before going to sleep, I always read a few pages.
In sebelum tidur, the understood sleeper is normally saya, the main-clause subject. A public prohibition may leave the intended actor generic or situationally obvious:
Dilarang makan dan minum di dalam ruang arsip.
Eating and drinking are prohibited inside the archive room. (formal notice)
Here makan dan minum complement passive dilarang. They have no overt actor, but the notice is directed at anyone subject to the rule. “No pronounced agent” is therefore not the same as “no semantic actor.”
Lexical limits: some roots are naturally bare, others are not
Makan, minum, tidur, and pergi are extremely frequent as bare predicates in speech and writing. Their existence does not license menidur or mempergi as ordinary actor verbs. Larger families express different valency: menidurkan anak means “put a child to bed.”
Setelah makan, bayi itu tidur hampir dua jam.
After eating, the baby slept for almost two hours.
Ayah menidurkan bayi itu sebelum tamu datang.
Dad put the baby to bed before the guests arrived.
Memakan and meminum do exist, but they are not obligatory replacements for ordinary makan and minum. Memakan is common with explicit affected objects and figurative consumption; meminum can sound careful or formal with medicine and measured substances.
Perbaikan jembatan itu memakan waktu enam bulan.
Repairing that bridge took six months.
Pasien diminta meminum obat sesuai dosis yang ditentukan.
The patient is asked to take the medicine according to the prescribed dose. (formal)
By contrast, full actor-oriented membaca and menulis dominate careful prose. Bare baca/tulis remain frequent in object voice and imperatives across registers, and as actor predicates in informal conversation.
An annotated formal paragraph
Setelah peserta makan dan minum, mereka pergi ke ruang baca. Mereka membaca dua artikel dan menulis ringkasan. Artikel yang mereka baca membahas kualitas tidur, sedangkan ringkasan yang mereka tulis dikumpulkan sebelum mereka pergi.
After the participants ate and drank, they went to the reading room. They read two articles and wrote summaries. The articles they read discussed sleep quality, while the summaries they wrote were collected before they left. (formal)
- Makan, minum, and pergi are ordinary bare predicates.
- Membaca and menulis mark actor-oriented transitive clauses whose continuing topic is mereka.
- Yang mereka baca/tulis switches to bare roots because the relative heads artikel/ringkasan are patients in object voice.
- Tidur occurs in the noun phrase kualitas tidur, illustrating the root's category flexibility.
A colloquial exchange
A: Udah makan dan minum belum? B: Udah. Aku mau pergi ke perpustakaan. Buku ini belum selesai aku baca, terus aku harus tulis rangkumannya sebelum tidur.
A: Have you eaten and had something to drink yet? B: Yes. I'm going to the library. I haven't finished reading this book, and then I have to write its summary before bed. (informal)
The exchange combines standard bare makan, minum, pergi, and tidur with colloquial udah and actor-oriented aku harus tulis. Buku ini ... aku baca is also object voice, licensed independently of casual reduction. In careful prose, the final actor-oriented clause would normally use saya harus menulis rangkumannya.
Common Mistakes
1. Keeping meN- in a patient relative with a preverbal actor
❌ Novel yang saya membaca di pesawat sangat menarik.
Incorrect—the head noun is the patient, so the relative clause requires object voice.
✅ Novel yang saya baca di pesawat sangat menarik.
The novel I read on the plane was very interesting.
2. Treating an instrument like the extracted direct object
❌ Pena yang saya tulis surat itu sudah hilang.
Incorrect—the pen is an instrument, not the thing written.
✅ Pena yang saya pakai untuk menulis surat itu sudah hilang.
The pen I used to write that letter is missing.
3. Adding meN- mechanically to a lexical bare predicate
❌ Adik sudah menidur, lalu orang tua saya mempergi ke pasar.
Incorrect—tidur and pergi are ordinary bare predicates in these meanings.
✅ Adik sudah tidur, lalu orang tua saya pergi ke pasar.
My younger sibling has gone to sleep, and then my parents went to the market.
4. Using casual actor-oriented reduction in a formal report
❌ Peneliti baca data lalu tulis kesimpulan dalam laporan resmi.
Register mismatch—bare actor-oriented baca/tulis are too conversational for this formal report.
✅ Peneliti membaca data lalu menulis kesimpulan dalam laporan resmi.
The researchers read the data and then write the conclusion in the official report. (formal)
5. Calling standard object voice an erroneous passive
❌ Laporan itu sudah saya membaca kemarin.
Incorrect repair—adding meN- destroys the standard object-voice pattern.
✅ Laporan itu sudah saya baca kemarin.
I already read that report yesterday.
Key Takeaways
- Bare roots occur as lexical predicates, commands, object-voice verbs, elliptical forms, and informal actor predicates; these environments must not be conflated.
- Relative clauses and extraction align with voice: orang yang membaca buku but buku yang saya baca.
- Object voice with a bare root is fully standard and forms part of Indonesian's symmetrical voice ecology.
- Omitted actors in commands, adjuncts, and public notices are normally understood from control or context.
- Corpus-realistic distribution is lexical and register-sensitive: makan/minum/tidur/pergi are broadly bare, while actor-oriented baca/tulis favor meN- in careful prose.
Now practice Indonesian
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Indonesian →Related Topics
- Bare Verbal Roots: Overview and FormationA1 — Recognize Indonesian verbal roots as complete predicates in unaffixed, imperative, conversational, serial, and object-oriented constructions.
- Bare Verbal Roots: Subjects, Objects, and Argument OrderA2 — Identify subjects, objects, agents, and omitted arguments around bare Indonesian verbs by combining order, voice, and discourse evidence.
- Bare Verbal Roots: Choosing This ConstructionA2 — Choose bare roots by matching lexical verb type, voice, topicality, definiteness, and register to the discourse context.
- Bare Verbal Roots: Aspect, Modality, and NegationC1 — Build temporal, modal, negative, and prohibitive meanings by placing separate particles before an unchanged Indonesian verbal root.
- Object Voice with a Bare Verb: Overview and FormationA2 — Recognize the patient-first Indonesian construction in which a pronominal actor stands directly before an unprefixed verb.
- Object Relatives and Voice SwitchingB2 — Relativize a transitive patient by switching to object voice or a di-passive instead of retaining actor-voice meN-.