Officialese and Bureaucratic Style

Virkakieli — the dense, impersonal Finnish of laws, forms, official letters and administrative decisions — is a register built to background who is doing what. Its critics call it kapulakieli, roughly "gobbledygook" (literally "stick-language"), and Finland runs an official campaign against its excesses. For a learner, virkakieli is worth studying not to imitate but to decode: you will meet it the moment you receive a tax letter, a residence-permit decision or a tenancy contract, and its compression is systematic enough that a few markers unlock most of it. This page names those markers, shows a bureaucratic sentence beside a plain rewrite, and warns against the very common error of letting this style creep into ordinary email.

Underlying all of it is a legal irony: the Finnish Administrative Procedure Act (hallintolaki) actually requires clear language of authorities. Yet the style persists, which tells you it is a genuine register with its own pull, not merely bad writing.

Viranomaisen on käytettävä asiallista, selkeää ja ymmärrettävää kieltä.

An authority must use appropriate, clear and comprehensible language. (Administrative Procedure Act §9 — itself in the necessive 'on käytettävä' it fails to escape)

Marker 1: nominalization — verbs turned into nouns

The engine of virkakieli is nominalization: turning verbs into nouns, chiefly with -minen (the "-ing" verbal noun) and with derivational suffixes like -us / -os. Hakea "to apply" becomes hakeminen "applying" or hakemus "an application"; päättää "to decide" becomes päätös "a decision"; toimittaa "to deliver" becomes toimittaminen. Once actions are frozen into nouns, whole sentences can be built with almost no live verbs — which is precisely the effect the register wants.

Lomakkeen täyttäminen ja palauttaminen on hakijan vastuulla.

Filling in and returning the form is the applicant's responsibility. (two -minen nominalizations; a verb-first rewrite: Hakija täyttää ja palauttaa lomakkeen itse.)

Päätöksestä valittaminen edellyttää kirjallista muutoksenhakua.

Appealing the decision requires a written appeal. (nominalized valittaminen + the -us noun muutoksenhaku; plainly: Jos haluat valittaa, tee se kirjallisesti.)

The mechanics of these verbal nouns are covered under nominalization; here the point is stylistic. Every -minen is a place where a plain verb — and often its subject — has been dissolved.

Marker 2: the agentless passive

Finnish officialese leans hard on the passive, which in Finnish is inherently agentless — it states that something is done without naming the doer. This is the register's second way of hiding the actor: not "the office will process your application" but "the application will be processed".

Hakemus käsitellään saapumisjärjestyksessä, ja päätöksestä ilmoitetaan kirjeitse.

The application is processed in order of arrival, and the decision is notified by letter. (two agentless passives — no one is named as doing either)

Päätökseen voidaan hakea muutosta valittamalla hallinto-oikeuteen.

A change to the decision may be sought by appealing to the administrative court. (passive voidaan + nominalized 'appeal by appealing')

The passive's role in formal writing has its own treatment at the passive in writing. In virkakieli it combines with nominalization to produce prose in which, sometimes, no human being appears at all.

Marker 3: participle postpositions — koskien, liittyen, johtuen

A distinctive tic of the register is a set of participle forms used as postpositions or connectives: koskien "concerning", liittyen "relating to", johtuen "due to", koskeva "concerning" (as a modifier). These are the instructive of the second infinitive (see the second infinitive instructive), and they let the writer bolt a heavy adverbial onto a sentence without a subordinate clause.

Hakuaikaan liittyen ilmoitamme, että määräaikaa on jatkettu 31.5. saakka.

Relating to the application period, we announce that the deadline has been extended until 31 May. (liittyen as a postposition; plainly: Ilmoitamme, että hakuaikaa on jatkettu…)

Järjestelmähäiriöstä johtuen sähköinen asiointi ei ole tällä hetkellä käytettävissä.

Due to a system fault, electronic transactions are not currently available. (johtuen; plainly: Palvelu ei toimi, koska järjestelmässä on häiriö.)

These are grammatical and even useful in moderation, but piled up they are a reliable fingerprint of officialese, and the plain-language movement targets them for replacement by ordinary koska "because" and -sta/-stä case forms.

Marker 4: the necessive — on toimitettava, tulee tehdä

Obligation in virkakieli is expressed impersonally through necessive structures, above all the -ttava / -ttävä participle ("must be X-ed") and the modal tulee + infinitive "shall/must". On toimitettava "must be delivered", on esitettävä "must be presented", tulee hakea "must apply". Like the passive, these background the actor: they say a thing must be done without saying by whom.

Hakemus on toimitettava viraston kirjaamoon viimeistään 30.4. ennen klo 16.15.

The application must be submitted to the agency registry by 30 April at the latest, before 4:15 pm. (on toimitettava — obligation with no named agent)

Vaaditut asiakirjat on esitettävä pyydettäessä alkuperäisinä.

The required documents must be presented in the original on request. (on esitettävä + the temporal passive pyydettäessä 'when requested')

The full paradigm of -ttava obligation lives at the necessive participle. Note the two forms in the examples: back-vowel toimitettava with -ttava, front-vowel esitettävä with -ttävä — the harmony split matters (see the mistakes below).

The two-marker decoding key

Here is the practical shortcut. Of all its machinery, virkakieli leans on two tools above the rest to erase the actor: the -minen verbal noun and the -ttava/-ttävä necessive participle. Train your eye to spot those two — täyttäminen, toimittaminen; toimitettava, esitettävä — and most bureaucratic sentences decode at a glance, because those two markers are precisely where a live verb and its human subject have been dissolved. Recover the verb and supply the missing "you" or "the office", and the meaning falls out.

Watch the whole transformation on one sentence, from full officialese to plain language:

Edellä mainittuun päätökseen tyytymätön asianosainen voi hakea siihen muutosta valittamalla.

A party dissatisfied with the aforementioned decision may seek a change to it by appealing. (standard appeal-rights boilerplate)

Jos et ole tyytyväinen päätökseen, voit valittaa siitä.

If you're not happy with the decision, you can appeal it. (the same content in plain language — a live verb and a real 'you')

💡
The plain rewrite does two things officialese resists: it puts back a live verb (valittaa, not valittaminen) and it names a real person (sinä, "you"). If you can restore those two, you have decoded the register.

The plain-language countercurrent: selkeä virkakieli and selkokieli

Officialese is under organised attack. The Institute for the Languages of Finland (Kotus) promotes selkeä virkakieli "clear official language" — plainer administrative writing that still counts as standard yleiskieli. Distinct from it, and more radical, is selkokieli "plain/easy language": a formally defined simplified variety, with shorter sentences and controlled vocabulary, produced for readers with reading or language difficulties. Both push against kapulakieli, but they are not the same thing — selkeä virkakieli is ordinary clear standard prose, whereas selkokieli is a deliberately simplified register with its own guidelines.

Comparison with English

English has the identical disease — "Applications must be submitted...", "with regard to...", "the aforementioned party" — and the same cure, the Plain English movement, mirrors Finland's selkeä virkakieli campaign almost point for point. So English speakers recognise the smell of officialese immediately. The transfer error is different: it is importing this register into ordinary Finnish email, where it reads cold and evasive. An English speaker who would never write "I am in receipt of your communication" to a friend can nonetheless reach for Viestiänne koskien ilmoitan... in Finnish, mistaking bureaucratic heaviness for politeness. In everyday correspondence, plainer is warmer.

Common Mistakes

❌ (friendly email) Viestiänne koskien ilmoitan, että asian käsittely on aloitettu.

Bureaucratic and cold for a friendly message — the officialese register reads as evasive between people who know each other.

✅ Kiitos viestistä! Aloitin jo asian selvittämisen.

Thanks for your message! I've already started looking into it. (warm, plain, still polite)

❌ Hakemus on toimitetava kirjaamoon.

Gemination lost — the necessive participle doubles the t: toimitettava, not toimitetava.

✅ Hakemus on toimitettava kirjaamoon.

The application must be submitted to the registry.

❌ Asiakirjat on esitettava pyydettäessä.

Harmony error — esittää is a front-vowel word, so the necessive is esitettävä with ä, not -ttava.

✅ Asiakirjat on esitettävä pyydettäessä.

The documents must be presented on request.

❌ (plain speech dressed as officialese) Kaupassa käyminen on suoritettava ennen sulkemisaikaa.

Absurdly over-nominalized for an everyday statement — just use a verb and a person.

✅ Käyn kaupassa ennen kuin se menee kiinni.

I'll go to the shop before it closes.

Key Takeaways

  • Virkakieli / kapulakieli is Finnish bureaucratic style: dense, impersonal, built to background the actor. Study it to decode, not to imitate.
  • Four markers: nominalization (-minen, -us/-os), the agentless passive, participle postpositions (koskien, liittyen, johtuen), and necessive structures (on toimitettava, tulee tehdä).
  • The decoding key is two of those markers: spot the -minen verbal noun and the -ttava/-ttävä necessive participle, restore a live verb and a real subject, and the sentence opens up.
  • Keep the double consonant and harmony in the necessive: back toimitettava, front esitettävä — never toimitetava or esitettava.
  • Finland pushes back with selkeä virkakieli (clear standard writing) and the distinct selkokieli (a defined easy-language variety). The learner's error is importing officialese into ordinary email, where plainer is warmer.

Now practice Finnish

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Finnish

Related Topics

  • Nominalization and Heavy Noun PhrasesC2Packing clauses into heavy noun phrases with the -minen infinitive, -us/-uus abstracts, and se, että — the hallmark of academic Finnish.
  • The Passive in Formal WritingC1How academic and official Finnish uses the agentless passive (Tässä artikkelissa tarkastellaan…) to hedge, generalise, and keep the doer out of view.
  • Academic FinnishC1Scholarly Finnish is precise, impersonal and nominal: heavy nominalization with -minen and -uus/-yys abstracts, the impersonal passive for objectivity, dense participial and että-clause embedding, and careful hedging — plus the harmony trap luotettavuus vs pätevyys.
  • Text: Legal and Official LanguageC2A short administrative regulation in authentic Finnish officialese (virkakieli), annotated for its necessive -ttava/-ttävä participle, agentless passive, heavy nominalization, and long genitive-chain premodifiers.