-ig-: Causation

The suffix -ig- creates a causal action: the subject causes the result expressed by the base. Varmigi means to make something warm, sidigi to cause someone to sit, and manĝigi to cause someone or something to eat. Every -ig- verb is transitive: its direct object is the participant changed or brought into the resulting situation.

English often hides causation inside unrelated verbs—seat, feed, lengthen, sharpen—or uses make, have, and get. Esperanto exposes the shared logic, but the base’s category determines what kind of result -ig- creates. Valency is therefore part of the word’s meaning, not a detail added afterward.

The Result Comes Before -ig-

The material before -ig- describes the result; the subject causes that result, and the object undergoes the change.

Base resultCausativeMeaning
varma — warmvarmigicause something to become warm
sidi — sitsidigicause someone to sit
flami — burn/flameflamigicause something to flame
en domo — in a houseendomigimove someone/something indoors

La matena suno rapide varmigis la ĉambron.

The morning sun quickly warmed the room.

La ĉambro varmiĝis kiam la suno aperis.

The room became warm when the sun appeared.

This is the central -ig-/-iĝ- contrast. Varmigi introduces a causer and an affected object; varmiĝi presents the affected participant as undergoing the change. See -iĝ- for change without an external causer in the clause.

Ne varmigu la lakton tro multe; ĝi estas por la bebo.

Do not heat the milk too much; it is for the baby.

Ĉu vi jam akrigis la kuirejajn tranĉilojn?

Have you sharpened the kitchen knives yet?

💡
Read from the inside out: first identify the result before -ig-, then add “cause the object to reach that result.”

Quality Roots: Make The Object Become X

With a quality root, -ig- means “give the object that quality” or “make it become X.” Akrigi makes sharp, paligi makes pale, purigi makes clean, and longigi makes long.

La terura novaĵo paligis ŝin.

The terrible news made her turn pale.

Ni longigos la tablon per aldona sekcio.

We will lengthen the table with an extra section.

Bonvolu purigi la tablon antaŭ la vespermanĝo.

Please clean the table before dinner.

Longigi and plilongigi have a logical distinction: the first makes something long; the second makes it longer than before. In practice, the two overlap when the comparison is obvious. Conversely, speakers normally use mallongigi “shorten” rather than mechanically building heavier plimallongigi or malplilongigi.

La organizantoj plilongigis la limdaton je unu semajno.

The organizers extended the deadline by one week.

The result stem may itself contain another affix. Malvarmigi is built on malvarma “cold”: cause something to become cold. It does not inherently mean “undo a previous warming”; context may supply that history, but the morphology supplies only the cold result.

Metu la supon en la fridujon por malvarmigi ĝin.

Put the soup in the refrigerator to cool it.

Intransitive Action Roots: Cause The Subject To Act

When the base verb is intransitive, its original subject becomes the object of the -ig- verb:

  • la infano sidas → mi sidigas la infanon;
  • la gasto dormas → la kuracilo dormigas la gaston;
  • la akvo bolas → ni boligas la akvon.

La instruisto sidigis la lernantojn en du rondoj.

The teacher seated the students in two circles.

La longa prelego preskaŭ dormigis min.

The long lecture almost put me to sleep.

Boligu la akvon antaŭ ol aldoni la paston.

Bring the water to a boil before adding the pasta.

The causer need not act intentionally. A medicine can dormigi, news can paligi, and rain can prokrastigi an event. -Ig- asserts a causal relation, not coercion or conscious command.

La forta neĝo prokrastigis ĉiujn matenajn flugojn.

The heavy snow delayed all the morning flights.

Transitive Action Roots: Two Participants Compete For Object Position

With a transitive base, causation adds a new participant to an event that already has an agent and an object. Manĝi has an eater and food; manĝigi adds a causer. Esperanto normally puts one of the inner participants in the direct-object role and marks the other differently.

Mi manĝigis la bebon per legoma supo.

I fed the baby vegetable soup.

Here la bebon is the caused eater, now the object of manĝigis; per legoma supo supplies the food. A different framing makes the food the direct object and the eater an al phrase:

Mi manĝigis iom da supo al la bebo.

I fed some soup to the baby.

The same alternation appears with komprenigi. You can cause a person to understand a proposition, or make the proposition understood to that person.

Mi finfine komprenigis lin, ke la bileto ne estas repagebla.

I finally made him understand that the ticket is not refundable.

Mi ne sukcesis komprenigi la ŝercon al li.

I did not manage to make the joke understood to him.

Do not mark both inner participants as unrelated direct objects. Choose which participant the causative presents as directly affected, then express the other with al, per, a content clause, or another suitable construction. The accusative with causatives page treats these clause patterns in depth.

Noun Roots And Other Categories

With a noun-like base, -ig- can cause the object to become the named role or thing, acquire its characteristic form, or perform the associated action. Convention decides which relation is normal.

La gepatroj edzigis sian filon al amikino de la familio.

The parents married their son to a family friend.

Pintigu la krajonon antaŭ ol vi komencas desegni.

Sharpen the pencil before you start drawing.

Petro flamigis la fajron per forta blovado.

Petro made the fire flare up by blowing hard.

Edzigi reflects traditional vocabulary in which edzo is a husband; modern speakers often choose the ordinary reciprocal verb phrase geedziĝi kun when focusing on the couple rather than an outside arranger. The causative structure itself remains transparent.

A particle or prepositional phrase can also supply the result: forigi “remove,” transigi “transfer across,” kunigi “join,” endomigi “bring indoors,” entombigi “bury.” These formations are conventional, but their internal scope differs.

Kiam komencis pluvi, ni rapide endomigis la seĝojn.

When it began to rain, we quickly brought the chairs indoors.

La programo aŭtomate transigis la datumojn al la nova sistemo.

The program automatically transferred the data to the new system.

— Ĉu vi povas forigi ĉi tiun makulon? — Mi provos, sed ĝi jam sekiĝis.

— Can you remove this stain? — I will try, but it has already dried.

In endomigi, the whole phrase-like result “in a house/indoors” precedes -ig-. In kunordigi “coordinate,” however, kun- modifies the already established ordigi and relates its object to something else; it is not simply “cause to be with order.” Such lexicalized differences are why theoretically possible parsing must be checked against actual usage.

When The Simple Verb Is Already Causal

Esperanto roots have conventional verbal meanings. A simple verb may already express causation, so adding -ig- can add a second causer or create a different word.

Fini normally means “finish, bring to an end.” Finigi therefore means “cause someone to finish” or, in some contexts, have something finished—not merely “finish” with extra emphasis.

Mi finos la raporton hodiaŭ.

I will finish the report today.

La redaktoro igis la novan asistanton fini la raporton.

The editor had the new assistant finish the report.

The second example uses independent igi because it makes all participant roles immediately clear. A compact finigi construction is possible when context establishes who is made to finish what, but the analytical form is often easier to process.

Similarly, maski already means put a mask on or conceal with a mask; maskigi normally means cause someone else to mask. Lumi means emit light, while lumigi means make something give light or illuminate. Limi and limigi, kolori and kolorigi, and ordi/ordigi show areas of accepted overlap or lexical distinction. There is no purely logical shortcut: idiomatic speakers learn which simple roots are already causative.

Safrano koloras la rizon oranĝe.

Saffron colors the rice orange.

Ni devas limigi la elspezojn ĉi-monate.

We must limit expenses this month.

The pedagogical recommendation is to prefer the established shorter verb when it already has the intended causal meaning. Consult usage before inventing a heavier form. See lexicalization and conventionality.

Independent Igi And Nonverbal Endings

The suffix is also the independent verb igi, “make/cause.” It can take an object plus an infinitive or a result description.

La nova regulo igis nin ŝanĝi la planon.

The new rule made us change the plan.

Tiu muziko ĉiam igas min gaja.

That music always makes me cheerful.

In the second pattern, gaja is a predicative complement and does not take accusative -n. Compare the compact derivative gajigi min, “cheer me up.”

The stem can take nonverbal endings: akrigo “sharpening,” akriga “sharpening/causing sharpness,” sidigo “the act of seating.” The underlying causative roles remain.

La subita prezaltigo kolerigis multajn klientojn.

The sudden price increase angered many customers.

Common Mistakes

Adding -ig- To A Verb That Is Already Causal

❌ Mi finigos mian laboron antaŭ la sesa.

Wrong if the speaker will personally finish it — finigi adds another layer of causation.

✅ Mi finos mian laboron antaŭ la sesa.

I will finish my work before six.

Keeping The Old Subject Unmarked

❌ La instruisto sidigis la lernantoj.

Incorrect — the original sitters become the direct object of sidigi.

✅ La instruisto sidigis la lernantojn.

The teacher seated the students.

Confusing Causation With Change Of State

❌ La supo varmigis sur la forno.

Incorrect — varmigi requires a causer acting on an object.

✅ La supo varmiĝis sur la forno.

The soup became warm on the stove.

Building A Heavy Form Without Checking Convention

❌ Ŝi maskigis sin por ke neniu rekonu ŝin.

Wrong for putting on her own disguise — maskigi normally adds a separate causer.

✅ Ŝi maskis sin por ke neniu rekonu ŝin.

She disguised herself so that nobody would recognize her.

💡
A grammatical -ig- coinage can still be unidiomatic if the simple verb already carries the causal meaning. Analyze the roles, then check the conventional verb.

Key Takeaways

  • The base before -ig- expresses the result; the subject causes the object to reach it.
  • All -ig- verbs are transitive, and action bases change the mapping of participant roles.
  • Quality roots yield “make X,” intransitive verbs yield “cause to act,” and transitive verbs create a three-participant situation.
  • Simple verbs such as fini and maski may already be causal; extra -ig- changes or burdens the meaning.
  • Affix stacking, lexical convention, and clear role marking are essential for idiomatic use.

Now practice Esperanto

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Esperanto →

Related Topics

  • -iĝ-: Becoming, Spontaneous ChangeB2 — Use -iĝ- for entering a new state, action, or location and for intransitive change whose affected participant becomes the subject.
  • Valency-Changing DerivationB1 — Use -ig- and -iĝ- to add a causer, remove a causer, and build precise causative and change-of-state verbs in Esperanto.
  • Accusative with CausativesA2 — How igi and -ig- select the affected participant, and how Esperanto marks additional roles in causative constructions.
  • Affix Stacking and ScopeB2 — Interpret and build multi-affix Esperanto words by applying each layer in order and keeping the semantic head and participant roles clear.
  • -IG- or -IĜ-?C1 — Choose -ig- when a causer changes someone or something, and -iĝ- when the changing participant itself is the subject.