Collocations with Havi | Esperanto Grammar

Havi expresses a broad relation in which something belongs to, is available to, characterizes, or is connected with the subject. That core supports everyday collocations such as havi tempon, havi ideon, havi problemon, and havi la impreson, ke…. The noun in the variable slot is normally a direct object.

English uses have in many additional roles, including perfect tenses and expressions such as “have breakfast.” Those uses do not automatically transfer. Esperanto uses havi only when its broad belonging or availability meaning is genuinely present.

The core pattern: iu havas ion

What the subject has takes accusative -n. The relation may be legal ownership, temporary possession, a body part, a family relation, or a characteristic.

Mi havas rezervan ŝlosilon, se vi ne trovas la vian.

I have a spare key if you cannot find yours.

La apartamento havas du dormoĉambrojn kaj malgrandan balkonon.

The apartment has two bedrooms and a small balcony.

Ŝi havas du fratojn, kiuj loĝas en malsamaj landoj.

She has two brothers who live in different countries.

The subject does not have to own the object. Mi havas la dokumentojn may simply mean that the documents are with me or available to me now. Use posedi when legal or lasting ownership is the point, porti for something worn or carried, and teni for something held.

Ĉu vi havas mian plumon? — Jes, mi redonos ĝin post minuto.

Do you have my pen? — Yes, I will return it in a minute.

💡

Havi is broader than “own.” It presents an object, resource, relation, or property as connected with the subject; context specifies the exact connection.

Time, opportunity, reason, and right

Many common havi collocations describe a resource that makes an action possible. The action often follows por + infinitive or a bare infinitive after a noun such as kialo or rajto.

Frame	Meaning	Typical continuation
havi tempon	have time available	por fari ion
havi okazon	have an opportunity/occasion	fari ion
havi eblecon	have the possibility	fari ion
havi kialon	have a reason	fari ion / por io
havi rajton	have the right	fari ion / je io

Mi ne havas tempon por kuiri hodiaŭ, do ni manĝu en la kafejo.

I do not have time to cook today, so let's eat at the café.

Dum la konferenco ni havos okazon renkonti la aŭtoron.

During the conference, we will have an opportunity to meet the author.

Vi havas rajton peti klarigon antaŭ ol vi subskribos.

You have the right to ask for an explanation before you sign.

Mi havas nenian kialon dubi ŝian rakonton.

I have no reason to doubt her story.

Por + infinitive often presents intended use of a resource: tempo por legi. After kialo, the bare infinitive names the action motivated by that reason. Both structures are meaningful; do not add a preposition by translating English word for word.

Questions, problems, and topics

A second productive group names a thought or issue and then specifies its topic with a preposition.

havi demandon pri io — have a question about something;
havi problemon kun io/iu — have a problem involving something or someone;
havi ideon pri io — have an idea about something;
havi opinion pri io — have an opinion about something;
havi intereson pri io — have an interest in something.

Mi havas demandon pri la repaga politiko de la hotelo.

I have a question about the hotel's refund policy.

Ni havas problemon kun la hejta sistemo; ĝi ĉesas funkcii ĉiun nokton.

We have a problem with the heating system; it stops working every night.

Ĉu vi jam havas opinion pri la du proponoj?

Do you already have an opinion about the two proposals?

The preposition belongs to the relation expressed by the noun: a question is pri a topic, while a practical problem may be kun a device or person. Havi itself still takes the entire noun phrase as its object.

A simple verb can be more direct: Mi demandas…, Mi opinias, ke…, Mi interesiĝas pri…. The noun collocation is useful when you want to count, describe, or introduce the thought: Mi havas du mallongajn demandojn.

Clause frames: impressions, hopes, and goals

Some abstract nouns naturally introduce content clauses. The fixed core remains havi + object, while the ke-clause fills the content slot.

Mi havas la impreson, ke ni jam renkontiĝis ie.

I have the impression that we have met somewhere before.

Ni ankoraŭ havas esperon, ke la vetero pliboniĝos antaŭ la ekskurso.

We still hope that the weather will improve before the excursion.

La grupo havas la celon kolekti sufiĉan monon por nova ambulanco.

The group has the goal of raising enough money for a new ambulance.

With impreso and espero, ke presents the proposition perceived or hoped for. With celo, a same-agent infinitive is compact and natural. The equivalent simple verbs—ŝajnas al mi, mi esperas, la grupo celas—are often smoother when the noun itself needs no modifier.

Physical states: where havi is natural

Esperanto can present a symptom as something a person has: havi kapdoloron, havi febron, havi tuson. This is an ordinary extension of the core relation.

Mi havas fortan kapdoloron, do mi iros hejmen pli frue.

I have a bad headache, so I will go home earlier.

La infano havas febron, sed li jam trinkis multe da akvo.

The child has a fever, but he has already drunk plenty of water.

Esperanto also has direct state verbs: malsati “be hungry,” soifi “be thirsty,” timi “be afraid,” pravi “be right.” English have or be offers no safe guide to which Esperanto structure is conventional.

Mi malsatas, sed mi ne soifas.

I am hungry, but I am not thirsty.

Forms such as havi malsaton are grammatically interpretable when hunger is treated as a named phenomenon, but they are marked in ordinary personal statements. The simple verbs are the pedagogically recommended neutral choice.

Havi ion por fari

In havi ion por fari, the object names what is available and the por-phrase states its intended use or the action connected with it.

Mi havas ion gravan por diri al vi post la kunveno.

I have something important to tell you after the meeting.

Ĉu vi havas ion por fari ĉi-vespere? — Ne, mi estas libera.

Do you have anything to do this evening? — No, I am free.

This frame is not a future tense. Havas por fari literally presents an available task, message, or object in relation to an action.

English “have” without Esperanto havi

Several everyday English collocations name actions, not possession or availability. Esperanto normally uses a direct verb:

English	Natural Esperanto
have breakfast	matenmanĝi
have lunch	tagmanĝi
have a shower	duŝi sin
have a rest	ripozi
have a good time	amuziĝi / agrable pasigi la tempon
have a look	rigardi / ekrigardi

Ni agrable pasigis la vesperon kaj revenis hejmen post noktomezo.

We had a good time that evening and returned home after midnight.

Mi rapide duŝos min, poste ni povas foriri.

I will have a quick shower, and then we can leave.

Most importantly, havi is not a perfect-tense auxiliary. Esperanto says Mi jam manĝis, not an imitation of English “I have eaten.” PMEG explicitly identifies this as a cross-linguistic trap; ordinary Esperanto uses the simple tense unless a compound with esti + participle is genuinely needed.

See the complete Esperanto verb system for how tense endings and compound forms divide this work.

Mi jam sendis la mesaĝon, sed ŝi ankoraŭ ne respondis.

I have already sent the message, but she has not replied yet.

💡

If English have only supports a tense or helps name an activity, remove it. Choose the Esperanto tense or the verb for the actual action.

Register and choice of wording

Havi is neutral in every register. Abstract collocations such as havi la impreson and havi la rajton are common in edited prose as well as conversation. Simple verbs can make formal writing less heavy: ni celas is often clearer than ni havas kiel celon.

The foundational pattern is subject + havi + accusative object. Accepted word-order variation can move a focused object forward because -n preserves its role: Tiun eblecon ni ne havas. The collocating noun selects later prepositions and clauses, so learn demandon pri, problemon kun, and impreson, ke as meaningful frames rather than as arbitrary strings.

Common Mistakes

Omitting accusative marking

❌ Ni havas grava problemo kun la servilo.

Incorrect — the problem is the direct object of havi.

✅ Ni havas gravan problemon kun la servilo.

We have a serious problem with the server.

Building an English-style perfect tense

❌ Mi havas finita la raporton.

Incorrect — havi is not a perfect auxiliary in Esperanto.

✅ Mi finis la raporton.

I have finished the report.

Translating “have breakfast” literally

❌ Ni havis matenmanĝon je la oka.

Unnatural if the intended meaning is simply that we ate breakfast.

✅ Ni matenmanĝis je la oka.

We had breakfast at eight.

Copying “have a good time”

❌ Ni havis bonan tempon ĉe la festo.

A literal English transfer, not the neutral Esperanto expression for enjoying oneself.

✅ Ni bone amuziĝis ĉe la festo.

We had a good time at the party.

Using havi where Esperanto has a state verb

❌ Mi havas malsata kaj soifa.

Incorrect — havi cannot combine with bare adjectives in this English-style frame.

✅ Mi malsatas kaj soifas.

I am hungry and thirsty.

Key Takeaways

Use havi + accusative object for possession, availability, relationships, resources, and abstract states. Learn the noun's continuation—tempo por, demando pri, problemo kun, impreso ke—rather than assigning every complement to havi itself. Use direct verbs for actions such as eating, showering, and resting, and never use havi merely to copy an English perfect tense.

Now practice Esperanto

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Esperanto →