Everyday Cairene uses ده da for a masculine singular referent, دي di for a feminine singular referent, and دول dōl for people or things understood as plural individuals. These words can stand alone—“this one,” “that one,” “these,” or “those”—or follow a noun phrase: الكتاب ده “this/that book.” English puts this before a noun and obligatorily contrasts this with that; ordinary Cairo Egyptian organizes both points differently.
This page teaches the mainstream urban Cairo forms (informal). The written variant دا is also widespread in informal Egyptian texts, but this guide consistently writes ده. Formal هذا، هذه، هؤلاء belong to MSA or deliberate formal code-switching (formal), not to the everyday paradigm below.
The core gender-and-number choice
| Referent | Form | Typical reading |
|---|---|---|
| masculine singular | ده | da |
| feminine singular | دي | di |
| plural individuals | دول | dōl |
The singular choice follows grammatical gender, not the object's shape or the English pronoun it. كتاب is masculine, so it selects ده; شنطة is feminine, so it selects دي.
ده مفتاح المكتب.
da miftāḥ il-maktab.
This is the office key.
دي شنطة سلمى.
di shanṭit Salma.
This is Salma's bag.
دول زمايلي من الشغل.
dōl zamāyli min ish-shoghl.
These are my coworkers.
The demonstratives are independent pronouns in these examples. Egyptian has no present-tense word corresponding to English is/are: literally, the structures are “this—office key,” “this—Salma's bag,” and “these—my coworkers.”
After a noun: the ordinary attributive pattern
When ده، دي، دول means “this/that noun” or “these/those nouns,” it normally follows a definite noun phrase. A simple common noun therefore takes الـ.
المفتاح ده بيفتح الباب الخلفي.
il-miftāḥ da biyiftaḥ il-bāb il-khalfi.
This key opens the back door.
الشنطة دي تقيلة قوي.
ish-shanṭa di tiʾīla ʾawi.
This bag is really heavy.
الناس دول مستنيين بره.
in-nās dōl mistannyīn barra.
These people are waiting outside.
English says this key, without the. Cairene says what is structurally “the key—this one.” The demonstrative asks the listener to locate an identifiable referent, so the noun phrase is definite. The demonstrative order page develops this difference with adjectives and possessors.
Plurals: دول for individuals, دي for many nonhuman sets
Human plurals normally take دول. Many nonhuman plurals are construed as a set and take feminine singular دي, matching the broader Egyptian tendency toward feminine singular agreement with nonhuman plurals. دول is also possible with animals or objects when the speaker presents them as salient individuals.
المهندسين دول شغالين على المشروع الجديد.
il-mohandisīn dōl shaghghālīn ʿala l-mashrūʿ il-gidīd.
These engineers are working on the new project.
الكتب دي وصلت امبارح.
il-kotob di wiṣlit imbāriḥ.
These books arrived yesterday.
الكلاب دول عارفيني وبيجروا ناحيتي.
il-kilāb dōl ʿārfīni wi-biyigru nāḥyiti.
These dogs know me and are running toward me.
The last sentence individuates particular dogs, which makes plural دول natural. In a general description of a nonhuman group, دي with feminine singular agreement is often preferred. This is a discourse choice as well as a dictionary property; it cannot be reduced to “animals always behave like people.”
Near and far: context usually does the work
Neutral Cairene ده، دي، دول do not force a near-versus-far contrast. Gesture, gaze, هنا “here,” هناك “over there,” and the ongoing conversation locate the referent.
الكرسي ده هنا محجوز.
il-korsi da hina maḥgūz.
This chair here is reserved.
الكرسي ده هناك مكسور.
il-korsi da hunāk maksūr.
That chair over there is broken.
English requires this in the first sentence and normally that in the second. Egyptian can use ده in both. Forms such as داك، ديك، دولاك exist (regional/socially marked), but they are not required for ordinary Cairo distance contrasts; see distant forms. Formal ذلك، تلك، أولئك are MSA (formal).
Demonstratives also point in discourse, not only in physical space:
الفكرة دي محتاجة وقت أكتر.
il-fikra di miḥtāga waʾt ʾaktar.
This idea needs more time.
No one has to be pointing at an object. دي retrieves an idea that has just been mentioned or is currently under discussion.
Adding اللي: one invariant linker, different gap types
A definite noun followed by a relative description normally uses اللي illi. Unlike MSA الذي، التي، الذين, everyday Egyptian اللي is largely invariant: it does not change for masculine, feminine, or plural antecedents. Gender and number are visible in the noun phrase and elsewhere in the clause.
With a subject gap, nothing replaces the antecedent inside the relative clause:
الولد ده اللي ساكن فوق بيدرس طب.
il-walad da lli sākin fōʾ biyidros ṭibb.
This boy, who lives upstairs, studies medicine.
The understood subject of ساكن is الولد ده. With an object gap, ordinary Egyptian uses a resumptive object suffix:
الكتاب ده اللي اشتريته طلع مفيد.
il-kitāb da lli ishtarēto ṭiliʿ mofīd.
This book that I bought turned out to be useful.
The ـه in اشتريته resumes الكتاب: structurally, “the book that I bought it.” English deletes the object pronoun, so English speakers often omit this suffix.
After a preposition, Egyptian keeps the preposition with a matching suffix rather than stranding it at the end as English can:
الموضوع ده اللي اتكلمنا عنه مهم.
il-mawḍūʿ da lli itkallimna ʿanno mohim.
This topic that we talked about is important.
Here عنه is literally “about it.” The invariant linker does not carry the missing preposition or object agreement; the resumptive clitic does that work. See resumptive pronouns for the complete system.
Definite antecedents use اللي; many indefinite ones use zero
A demonstrative makes an antecedent definite and identifiable, so اللي normally introduces its relative description. A genuinely indefinite noun commonly takes a relative clause directly, without اللي.
عايز كتاب يشرح القاعدة ببساطة.
ʿāyiz kitāb yishraḥ il-ʾāʿda bibasāṭa.
I want a book that explains the rule simply.
عايز الكتاب ده اللي بيشرح القاعدة برسومات.
ʿāyiz il-kitāb da lli biyishraḥ il-ʾāʿda birusūmāt.
I want this book, the one that explains the rule with illustrations.
The first speaker is looking for any suitable book; the second identifies a particular one. The presence or absence of اللي follows that definiteness contrast, not an English decision about whether that is optional.
A pointing and identification dialogue
أنهي شنطة تقصدي، دي ولا دي؟
ʾanhi shanṭa tiʾṣodi, di walla di?
Which bag do you mean, this one or this one?
الشنطة دي، اللي جنب الشباك.
ish-shanṭa di, illi gamb ish-shubbāk.
This bag—the one beside the window.
The first speaker combines the feminine head شنطة with standalone دي twice while pointing. The answer uses postnominal دي, then an identifying اللي clause with a subject-location gap.
Common Mistakes
1. Choosing the form from English “this,” not from Egyptian gender.
❌ الشنطة ده غالية.
Incorrect — feminine شنطة requires دي.
✅ الشنطة دي سعرها عالي.
ish-shanṭa di siʿraha ʿāli.
This bag is expensive.
2. Putting an attributive demonstrative first by copying English order.
❌ ده الكتاب الجديد غالي.
Incorrect for ‘this new book is expensive’ — initial ده means ‘this is the new book.’
✅ الكتاب الجديد ده غالي قوي.
il-kitāb il-gidīd da ghāli ʾawi.
This new book is very expensive.
3. Importing the MSA relative paradigm into casual speech.
❌ الولد الذي واقف هناك أخويا.
Register mismatch — الذي is formal MSA, not the neutral everyday Cairo linker.
✅ الولد اللي واقف هناك أخويا.
il-walad illi wāʾif hunāk ʾakhūya.
The boy standing over there is my brother.
4. Stranding a preposition as English does.
❌ الموضوع ده اللي اتكلمنا عن مهم.
Incorrect — عن needs a resumptive suffix referring back to الموضوع.
✅ الموضوع ده اللي اتناقشنا فيه مهم.
il-mawḍūʿ da lli itnāʾashna fīh mohim.
This topic that we discussed is important.
Key Takeaways
- Use ده with masculine singulars, دي with feminine singulars, and دول with plural individuals.
- A demonstrative after a definite noun means “this/that noun”; an initial demonstrative is an independent pronoun.
- Ordinary Cairo uses the same neutral forms for near and far reference, with context supplying distance.
- Definite demonstrative phrases take invariant اللي; object and prepositional relatives express the missing role with a resumptive clitic.
- Indefinite antecedents commonly take a relative clause without اللي.
Now practice Arabic
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Arabic →Related Topics
- Demonstratives and Noun-Phrase OrderA1 — Build Cairene demonstrative phrases by placing ده، دي، or دول after the complete definite noun phrase, including adjectives and possessors.
- Standalone or Adnominal DemonstrativesA1 — Distinguish independent ده، دي، دول from the same forms used after a complete definite noun phrase.
- داك، ديك، and دولاكA1 — Recognize marked Egyptian distant demonstratives and choose neutral Cairene alternatives when distance must be explicit.
- اللي: The Core Relative MarkerB1 — Use invariant اللي after definite human and nonhuman antecedents, then mark the antecedent's role with a gap or resumptive clitic.
- Demonstratives with Definite NounsB1 — How Egyptian ده، دي، and دول combine with definite nouns, adjectives, and discourse context.
- Resumptive PronounsB2 — Understand how Egyptian Arabic uses bound pronouns inside relative clauses and after fronted topics to point back to an accessible noun.